Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predicting potentially plant-available lead in contaminated residential sites

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lead (Pb)-based paints pose a serious health problem to people living in residential settings constructed prior to 1978. Children are at a greater risk to Pb exposure resulting from hand-to-mouth activity in Pb-contaminated residential soils. For soil Pb, the most environmentally friendly, potentially cheap, and visually unobtrusive in situ technology is phytoremediation. However, the limiting factor in a successful phytoremediation strategy is the availability of Pb for plant uptake. The purpose of this study was to establish a relationship between soil properties and the plant-available/exchangeable Pb fraction in the selected Pb-based paint-contaminated residential sites. We selected 20 such sites from two different locations (San Antonio, Texas and Baltimore, Maryland) with varying soil properties and total soil Pb concentrations ranging between 256 and 4,182 mg kg−1. Despite higher Pb levels in these soils that exceeds US EPA permissible limit of 400 mg kg − 1, it is known that the plant-available Pb pools are significantly lower because of their sorption to soil components such as organic matter, Fe–Mn oxides, and clays, and their precipitation in the form of carbonates, hydroxides, and phosphates. Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering showed that the potentially plant-available Pb fraction is controlled by soil pH in the case of acidic Baltimore soils, while soil organic matter plays a major role in alkaline San Antonio soils. Statistical models developed suggest that Pb is likely to be more available for plant uptake in Baltimore soils and a chelant-assisted phytoextraction strategy will be potentially necessary for San Antonio soils in mobilizing Pb from complexed pool to the plant-available pool. A thorough knowledge of site-specific factors is therefore essential in developing a suitable and successful phytoremediation model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdu, N. (2006). Soil-phosphorus extraction methodologies: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 1, 159–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. H., & Basta, N. T. (2009). Application of ridge regression to quantify marginal effects of collinear soil properties on phytoaccumulation of arsenic, cadmium, lead and zinc. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 28, 619–628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andra, S. S., Sarkar, D., Datta, R., & Saminathan, S. (2006). Lead in soils in paint contaminated residential sites at San Antonio, Texas, and Baltimore, Maryland. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 77, 643–650.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andra, S. S., Datta, R., Sarkar, D., Saminathan, S. K. M., Mullens, C. P., & Bach, S. B. H. (2009). Analysis of phytochelatin complexes in the lead tolerant vetiver grass [Vetiveria zizanioides (L.)] using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Environmental Pollution, 157, 2173–2183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Ma, L. Q., Chen, M., Hardison, D. W., & Harris, W. G. (2003). Weathering of lead bullets and their environmental effects at outdoor shooting ranges. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 526–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Ma, L. Q., Chen, M., Singh, S. P., & Harris, W. G. (2002). Impacts of phosphate amendments on lead biogeochemistry at a contaminated site. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 5296–5304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charlatchka, R., & Cambier, P. (2000). Influence of reducing conditions on solubility of trace metals in contaminated soils. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 118, 143–167.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, R., & Sarkar, D. (2004). Effective integration of soil chemistry and plant molecular biology in phytoremediation of metals: An overview. Environmental Geosciences, 11(2), 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. E. (1997). Heavy metal contaminated soils in an old industrial area of Wales, Great Britain: Source identification through statistical data interpretation. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 94, 85–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, E. A., Basta, N. T., Payton, M. E., Bradham, K. D., Schroder, J. L., & Lanno, R. P. (2006). Evaluating the contribution of soil properties to modifying lead phytoavailability and phytotoxicity. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25, 719–725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. W., & Cunningham, S. D. (1996). Lead phytoextraction: Species variation in lead uptake and translocation. New Phytologist, 134, 75–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. W., Chen, J. J., Berti, W. R., & Cunningham, S. D. (1997). Phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils: Role of synthetic chelates in lead phytoextraction. Environmental Science and Technology, 31, 800–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Impellitteri, C. A., Lu, Y. F., Saxe, J. K., Allen, H. E., & Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M. (2002). Correlation of the partitioning of dissolved organic matter fractions with the desorption of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn from 18 Dutch soils. Environment International, 28, 401–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. E., Clickner, R. P., Zhou, J. Y., Viet, S. M., Marker, D. A., Rogers, J. W., et al. (2002). The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in U.S. housing. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, A599–A606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, C. W., Zheng, S. J., He, Y. F., DiZhou, G., & Zhou, Z. X. (2005). Lead contamination in tea garden soils and factors affecting its bioavailability. Chemosphere, 59(8), 1151–1159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ji-tao, S., Bao-guo, T., Hong-tao, W., Basta, N., Schroder, J., & Casillas, M. (2006). Assessing availability, phytotoxicity and bioaccumulation of lead to rye grass and millet based on 0.1 mol/L Ca(NO3)2 extraction. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18, 958–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. X., Yang, X. E., He, Z. L., Jilani, G., Sun, C. Y., & Chen, S. M. (2007). Fractionation of lead in paddy soils and its bioavailability to rice plants. Geoderma, 141, 174–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, C. E., & Motto, H. L. (2000). Solubility of lead, zinc and copper added to mineral soils. Environmental Pollution, 107, 153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich-3 soil test extractant—a modification of Mehlich-2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 15, 1409–1416.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, S. Y., DeLaune, R. D., & Jugsujinda, A. (2006). Influence of sediment redox conditions on release/solubility of metals and nutrients in a Louisiana Mississippi River deltaic plain freshwater lake. Science of the Total Environment, 371, 334–343.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obrador, A., Alvarez, J. M., Lopez-Valdivia, L. M., Gonzalez, D., & Rico, N. M. I. (2007). Relationships of soil properties with Mn and Zn distribution in acidic soils and their uptake by a barley crop. Geoderma, 137, 432–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. 939. Washington: USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plassard, F., Winiarski, T., & Petit-Ramel, M. (2000). Retention and distribution of three heavy metals in a carbonated soil: Comparison between batch and unsaturated column studies. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 42, 99–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rico, M. I., Alvarez, J. M., Lopez-Valdivia, L. M., Novillo, J., & Obrador, A. (2009). Manganese and zinc in acidic agricultural soils from central Spain: Distribution and phytoavailability prediction with chemical extraction tests. Soil Science, 174, 94–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rioux, P. (2001). Baltimore lead paint abatement study faulted by court. International Real Estate Digest. Retrieved September 10, 2001 from http://www.IRED.com.

  • Sarkar, D., Andra, S. S., Saminathan, S. K. M., & Datta, R. (2008). Chelant-aided enhancement of lead mobilization in residential soils. Environmental Pollution, 156, 1139–1148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvé, S., McBride, M., & Hendershot, W. (1998). Soil solution speciation of lead(II): Effects of organic matter and pH. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62(3), 618–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D. (1996). Method of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical methods. Madison: SSSA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census (2000). United States Census 2000: Census 2000 data for the State of Texas. Retrieved January 10, 2005 from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html, last updated 15 April 2010.

  • USEPA (1996). Test methods for evaluating solid waste, SW 846 (3rd ed.). Washington: Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2001). U.S. EPA, Lead: Identification of dangerous levels of lead; Final rule. 40CFR745. Federal Register, 66, 6763–6765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, F. S., & Olsen, S. R. (1965). Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Proceedings—Soil Science Society of America, 29, 677–678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Q. W., Shu, W. S., Qiu, J. W., Wang, H. B., & Lan, C. Y. (2004). Lead in paddy soils and rice plants and its potential health risk around Lechang lead/zinc mine, Guangdong, China. Environment International, 30, 883–889.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Geochemistry Laboratory, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Syam S. Andra & Sumathi K. M. Saminathan

  2. Department of Earth and Environmental Studies, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, USA

    Dibyendu Sarkar

  3. Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA

    Rupali Datta

Authors
  1. Syam S. Andra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dibyendu Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sumathi K. M. Saminathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rupali Datta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syam S. Andra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andra, S.S., Sarkar, D., Saminathan, S.K.M. et al. Predicting potentially plant-available lead in contaminated residential sites. Environ Monit Assess 175, 661–676 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1559-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1559-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation