Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental Monitoring of Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes in a Mediterranean Region of Turkey

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unprecedented rates of human-induced changes in land use and land cover (LULC) at local and regional scales lead to alterations of global biogeochemical cycles. Driving forces behind LULC changes mainly include rapid growth rates of population and consumption, lack of valuation of ecological services, poverty, ignorance of biophysical limitations, and use of ecologically incompatible technologies. One of the major ecological tragedies of the commons in a Mediterranean region of Turkey is the loss of Lake Amik at the expense of increasing the area of croplands, which used to provide vital ecosystem goods and services for the region. In this study, we aimed at quantifying the effects of past land-use transitions on soil organic carbon (SOC) pools (0–20 cm) in a Mediterranean region of 3930 km2, between 1972 and 2000. LULC changes were quantified from a time series of satellite images of Landsat-MSS in 1972, Landsat-5 TM in 1987, and Landsat-7 ETM+ in 2000 using geographic information systems. The study showed that the increase in croplands between 1972 and 1987 took place at the expense of the irreversible losses of Lake Amik and its related wetlands of over 53 km2. In the period of 1972 to 2000, croplands, settlements, and evergreen forests increased by 174%, 106%, and 14%, respectively. The increase in settlements occurred mostly to the detriment of croplands. Given the average rates of all the land-use transitions, and associated changes in SOC density for the study region of 3930 km2, total SOC pool was estimated to decrease by 14.1% from 130.1 Mt in 1972 to 111.7 Mt in 2000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amezaga, J. M., Santamaria, L. and Green, A. J.: 2002, ‘Biotic wetland connectivity-supporting a new approach for wetland policy,’ Acta Oecologica 23, 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberoglu, S., Lloyd, C. D., Atkinson, P. M. and Curran, P. J.: 2000, ‘The integration of spectral and textural information using neural networks for land cover mapping in the Mediterranean,’ Comp. Geosci. 26, 385–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberoglu, S.: 2003, ‘Sustainable management for the Eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey,’ Environ. Manage. 31, 0442–0451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberoglu, S., Yilmaz, K. T. and Ozkan, C.: 2004, ‘Mapping and monitoring of coastal wetlands of Çukurova Delta in the Eastern Mediterranean region,’ Biodiv. Conserv. 13, 615–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, O. K., Minckley, T., Moutoux, T., Jull, T. and Kalin, B.: 2002, ‘The transformation of Sonoran Desert wetlands following the historic decrease of burning,’ J. Arid Environ. 50, 393–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, A. M.: 2004, ‘Wetlands of Central America,’ Wetlands Ecol. Manage. 12, 3–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evrendilek, F. and Doygun, H.: 2000, ‘Assessing major ecosystem types and the challenge of sustainability in Turkey,’ Environ. Manage. 26, 479–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evrendilek, F. and Ertekin, C.: 2002, ‘Agricultural sustainability in Turkey: Integrating food, environmental and energy securities,’ Land Degradation Develop. 13, 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evrendilek, F.: 2004, ‘An inventory-based carbon budget for forest and woodland ecosystems of Turkey,’ J. Environ. Monit. 6, 24–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evrendilek, F. and Wali, M. K.: 2004, ‘Changing global climate: Historical carbon and nitrogen budgets and projected responses of Ohio's cropland ecosystems,’ Ecosystems 7, 381–392.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GDSW (General Directory of Soil-Water): 1972, ‘Inventory Report of Soils in the Province of Hatay,’ Ministry of Rural Affairs, Office of Soil Surveys and Mapping, Ankara (in Turkish).

  • Gibbs, J. P.: 2000, ‘Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation,’ Conserv. Biology 14, 314–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R. A.: 2003, ‘Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000,’ Tellus 55B, 378–390.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IEC (International Engineering Company): 1966, ‘Technical and Feasibility Report of Amik Development: Projects of Lake Amik and Tahtaköprü Dam,’ Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, General Directory of State Hydroulic Works, Ankara.

  • Jensen, J. R.: 1996, Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 2nd edition. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay, E. and Cai, M.: 2003, ‘Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate,’ Nature 423, 528–531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilic, S.: 1999, ‘Soil Survey and Land Use Planning of Antakya by Using Remote Sensing/GIS Techniques,’ Ph.D. dissertation, Çukurova University. Adana-Turkey.

  • Kilic, S., Senol, S. and Evrendilek, F.: 2003, ‘Evaluation of land use potential and suitability of ecosystems in Antakya for reforestation, recreation, arable farming and Residence,’ Turkish J. Agriculture Forestry 27, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilic, S., Evrendilek, F., Senol, S. and Celik, I.: 2004, ‘Developing a suitability index for land uses and agricultural land covers: A case study in Turkey,’ Environ. Monit. Assess. 102, 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumerloeve, H.: 1988, ‘Amik Gölü, the lake of Antioch: Proposal for its revival as wildlife national park in South Eastern Turkey,’ Istanbul Univ. Fac. Natural Sci. Biol. J. 53, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R.: 2004, ‘Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security,’ Science 304, 1623–1627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly, A. D., Kingsford, R. T. and Thompson, J. R.: 2000, ‘Irrigated agriculture and wildlife conservation: Conflict on a global scale,’ Environ. Manage. 25, 0485–0512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MicroImage, Inc.: 2001, TNTmips V6.6. Lincoln NE, USA. Available at http://www.microimages.com/.

  • RARAFI (Research Association of Rural Areas and Forestry Issues): 2000, ‘Wildlife Protection Areas of Turkey’ Dönmez Ofset. Ankara.

  • STRCT (Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey): 2003, ‘Vision and Projection Report of Environment and Sustainable Development Thematic Panel,’ Vision 2023: Science and Technology Strategies, Technology Projection Project. Ankara.

  • Townshend, J. R. G. and Justice, C. O.: 2002, ‘Towards operational monitoring of terrestrial systems by moderate-resolution remote sensing,’ Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wali, M. K., Evrendilek, F., West, T., Watts, S., Pant, D., Gibbs, H. and McClead, B.: 1999, ‘Assessing terrestrial ecosystem sustainability: Usefulness of regional carbon and nitrogen models,’ Nature Resources 35, 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wali, M. K., Safaya, N. M. and Evrendilek, F.: 2002, Ecological Rehabilitation and Restoration in the Americas with Special Reference to the United States of America’. In: M. R. Perrow and A. J. Davy (eds.), Handbook of Restoration Ecology, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–31.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kilic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilic, S., Evrendilek, F., Berberoglu, S. et al. Environmental Monitoring of Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes in a Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 114, 157–168 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-2525-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-2525-z

Keywords

Navigation