Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender differences in shoppers’ behavioural reactions to ultra-low price tags at online merchants

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mistakenly-tagged low prices are harmful to online merchants but difficult to avoid completely, thus it is meaningful to track shoppers’ abnormal response to them and develop resolutions accordingly. In light of relevant issues received rare attention from both practitioners and researchers, this work aimed to identify shoppers’ typical behavioural reactions to ultra-low prices at Internet merchants, and further investigate gender differences in particular behavioural aspects. A consensus-based positional voting system, the modified Borda count and the Pareto analysis were applied to profile general shoppers’ behavioural responses. A survey was conducted to measure the intensity of subjects’ intention toward the identified behavioural aspects. Analysis using independent samples t-tests were performed to investigate gender differences in these reactions. Besides providing an insight into shoppers’ behavioural reactions to ultra-low prices at Internet storefronts, this work provides practitioners a basis for developing resolutions that are adaptive to customer populations with different proportions of male to female.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allexperts (2010). MLB most valuable player award. http://www.associatepublisher.com/e/m/ml/mlb_most_valuable_player_award.htm. Accessed 10 August 2010.

  2. Amanda, C., & Brigitte, B. (2003). Gender differences in cognitive and affective impulse buying. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7(3), 282–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apesteguia, J., Ballester, M., & Ferrer, R. (2006). On the justice of voting systems. Economics Working Papers, 1–34.

  4. Bae, S., & Lee, T. (2011). Gender differences in consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 201–214. doi:10.1007/s10660-010-9072-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellman, S., Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bettman, J. R. (1973). Perceived risk and its components: a model and empirical test. Journal of Marketing Research, X(May), 184–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biswas, A., Pullig, C., Yagci, M. I., & Dean, D. H. (2002). Consumer evaluation of low price guarantees: the moderating role of reference price and store image. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brogan, J. (2010). Expand your PARETO principle. Industrial Engineer, 42(11), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, M., Pope, N., & Voges, K. (2003). Buying or browsing?: an exploration of shopping orientations and online purchase intention. European Journal of Marketing, 37(11/12), 1666–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dasgupta, P., Moser, L., & Melliar-Smith, P. (2005). Dynamic pricing for time-limited goods in a supplier-driven electronic marketplace. Electronic Commerce Research, 5(2), 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Emerson, P. (2007). Collective decision-making: the modified Borda count (MBC). In P. Emerson (Ed.), Designing an all-inclusive democracy: consensual voting procedures for use in parliaments, councils, and committees (Vol. 1, pp. 15–38). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Emerson, P. (2010). Consensus voting and party funding: A Web-based experiment. European Political Science, 9(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Furnham, A., & Okamura, R. (1999). Your money or your life: behavioral and emotional predictors of money pathology. Human Relations, 52(9), 1157–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Girard, T., Korgaonkar, P., & Silverblatt, R. (2003). Relationship of type of product, shopping orientations, and demographics with preference for shopping on the Internet. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grosfeld-Nir, A., Ronen, B., & Kozlovsky, N. (2007). The Pareto managerial principle: when does it apply? International Journal of Production Research, 45, 2317–2325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Han, S., Gupta, S., & Lehmann, D. R. (2001). Consumer price sensitivity and price thresholds. Journal of Retailing, 77, 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasan, B. (2010). Exploring gender differences in online shopping attitude. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hernández-Ortega, B., Jiménez-Martínez, J., & Martín-DeHoyos, M. J. (2008). Differences between potential, new and experienced e-customers: analysis of e-purchasing behaviour. Internet Research, 18(3), 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho, T.-H., Tang, C. S., & Bell, D. R. (1998). Rational shopping behavior and the option value of variable pricing. Management Science, 44, S145–S160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Humphries, M. (2009). Dell mistake prices monitor at $15, Taiwan government wants 140,000 sales honored. http://www.geek.com/articles/chips/dell-mistake-prices-monitor-at-15-taiwan-government-wants-140000-sales-honored-2009072/. Accessed 16 August 2009.

  21. Index finds continued e-commerce growth (2011). http://www.retailtechnology.co.uk/news/index-finds-continued-e-commerce-growth. Accessed 8 August 2011.

  22. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kotler, P., & Kelle, K. L. (2006). Buying decision process. In Marketing management (12th ed., pp. 191–199). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kwom, K.-N., & Schumann, D. W. (2001). The influence of consumers’ price expectations on value perception and purchase intention. Advances in Consumer Research, 28(1), 316–322.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li, N., & Zhang, P. (2002). Consumer online shopping attitudes and behavior: an assessment of research. Paper presented at the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, Texas.

  26. Lii, Y.-s., & Sy, E. (2009). Internet differential pricing: effects on consumer price perception, emotions, and behavioral responses. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 770–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lokken, S. L., Cross, G. W., Halbert, L. K., Lindsey, G., Derby, C., & Stanford, C. (2003). Comparing online and non-online shoppers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(2), 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Macrumors (2010). Apple facing possible fine over Taiwanese Mac mini pricing errors. http://forums.macrumors.com/archive/index.php/t-977024.html. Accessed 10 September 2010.

  29. Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N. K., & Rigdon, E. (2002). The effect of dynamic retail experiences on experiential perceptions of value: an Internet and catalog comparison. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nathan, R. J., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2011). Crucial web usability factors of 36 industries for students: a large-scale empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 151–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Neslin, S. A., Henderson, C., & Quelch, J. (1985). Consumer promotions and the acceleration of product purchases. Marketing Science, 4(2), 147–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. NorthCutt, N., & McCoy, D. (2004). Interactive qualitative analysis—a system method for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nystedt, D. (2009). Dell’s online price error troubles worsen in Taiwan. PC World, 6 July 2009.

  35. Associated Press. (2009). Oops! Venice for a penny: Hotel offers 1-cent romantic weekend by mistake. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/world/ap/53251117.html. Accessed 30 August 2010.

  36. Ramanathan, R. (2010). E-commerce success criteria: determining which criteria count most. Electronic Commerce Research, 10(2), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rao, L. (2011). J.P. Morgan: global e-commerce revenue to grow by 19 percent in 2011 to $680B. http://techcrunch.com/2011/01/03/j-p-morgan-global-e-commerce-revenue-to-grow-by-19-percent-in-2011-to-680b/. Accessed 8 August 2011.

  38. Rodgers, S., & Harris, M. A. (2003). Gender and e-commerce: an exploratory study. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, 322–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saari, D. G. (1990). Susceptibility to manipulation. Public Choice, 64(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboke: Wiley-InterScience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Sebastianelli, R., Tamimi, N., & Rajan, M. (2008). Perceived quality of online shopping: does gender make a difference? Journal of Internet Commerce, 7(4), 445–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Slyke, C. V., Comunale, C. L., & Belanger, F. (2002). Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping. Communications of the ACM, 45(8), 82–86. doi:10.1145/545151.545155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Teng, L. (2009). A comparison of two types of price discounts in shifting consumers’ attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ulbrich, F., Christensen, T., & Stankus, L. (2011). Gender-specific on-line shopping preferences. Electronic Commerce Research, 11(2), 181–199. doi:10.1007/s10660-010-9073-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vainikainen, N., Kangas, A., & Kangas, J. (2008). Empirical study on voting power in participatory forest planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(1), 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Walmart (2010). E-Commerce a pillar of growth. MMR, 27(19), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wonseok, O., & Lucas, H. C. Jr (2006). Information technology and pricing decisions: price adjustments in online computer markets. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(3), 755–775.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yang, B., & Lester, D. (2005). Gender differences in e-commerce. Applied Economics, 37(18), 2077–2089. doi:10.1080/00036840500293292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou, L., Dai, L., & Zhang, D. (2007). Online shopping acceptance model—a critical survey of consumer factors in online shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was partially funded by the grant from the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC, under Grant No. NSC 100-2221-E-126-012. We deeply appreciate their financial support and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, ChungChou University of Science and Technology, Yuanlin Township, Changhua County, 510, Taiwan, ROC

    I-Ching Chen

  2. Department of Computer Science & Communication Engineering, Providence University, No. 200, Chung-Chi Road, Shalu, Taichung, 43301, Taiwan, ROC

    Shueh-Cheng Hu

Authors
  1. I-Ching Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shueh-Cheng Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shueh-Cheng Hu.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10660_2012_9102_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

A sample questionnaire for identifying the most representative behavioural aspects responding to online ultra-low prices (PDF 147 kB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, IC., Hu, SC. Gender differences in shoppers’ behavioural reactions to ultra-low price tags at online merchants. Electron Commer Res 12, 485–504 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9102-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-012-9102-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation