Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The relationship between website quality, trust and price premiums at online auctions

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study measures the value of website quality in terms of its impact on trust, intention to transact and price premiums. Prior research on online auctions has focused on the use of reputation systems for building trust in online auction vendors and subsequently to generate price premiums. This study examines the extent to which trust can be induced by improving the quality of online auction listings. A survey of 701 eBay users is conducted which compares the price premiums of two nearly identical online auction businesses, one that has online auction listings with a perceived high quality and the other that has substantially lower perceived quality. Results of this study indicate that website quality can explain 49% of the variation in the trust for eBay sellers. In fact, it shows that sellers with good website quality are all perceived to be equally trustworthy regardless of their eBay reputation; whereas sellers with poor website quality are not perceived to be trustworthy even if they have a high eBay reputation score. The results also show that the trust resulting from increased website quality increases intention to transact and results in price premiums of 12% (on average) for sellers with higher quality listings. Theories from marketing, economics, and social psychology are used to explain why website quality induces trust in unknown vendors without providing any concrete evidence regarding the vendor’s past history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Downes, P. K. (2007). Creating a practice website. British Dental Journal, 202(10), 597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, Z., Im, I., & Lee, S. J. (2000). The effect of negative consumer feedback on prices in Internet auction markets. In Proc. of the twenty-first international conference on information systems (pp. 286–287).

  4. Ottoway, T. A., Bruneau, C. L., & Evans, G. E. (2003). The impact of auction item image and consumer/vendor feedback ratings on electronic auctions. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(3), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Standifird, S. S. (2001). Reputation and e-commerce: eBay auctions and the asymmetrical impact of positive and negative ratings. Journal of Management, 27(3), 279–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Standifird, S. S. (2002). Online auctions and the importance of reputation type. Electronic Markets, 12(1), 58–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilkeson, J. H., & Reynolds, K. R. (2003). Determinants of Internet auction success and closing price: an exploratory study. Psychology and Marketing, 20(6), 537–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kauffman, R. J., & Wood, C. A. (2000). Running up the bid: modeling supplier opportunism in Internet auctions. In: M. Chung (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth Americas conference in information systems, (pp. 929–936).

  9. Read, W. H. (1962). Upward communication in industrial hierarchies. Human Relations, 15(3), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2001b). An evaluation of cyber-bookshops: the WebQual method. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, H., Xu, Y., & Koh, J. A. (2004). Comparison of online trust building factors between potential customers and repeat customers. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(10), 392–420.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, S., & Stoel, L. (2004). Dimensional hierarchy of retail website quality. Information Management, 41(5), 619–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shchiglik, C., & Barnes, S. (2004). Evaluating website quality in the airline industry. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44(3), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). The impact of initial consumer trust on Intentions to transact with a Web: a trust building model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3/4), 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ranganathan, C., & Ganapathy, S. (2002). Key dimensions of business-to-consumer Web sites. Information Management, 39(6), 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregg, D. G., & Walczak, S. (2008). Dressing your online auction business for success: an experiment comparing two e-Bay businesses. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bichler, M., Kalagnanam, J., Katircioglu, K., King, A. J., Lawrence, R. D., Lee, H. S., Lin, G. Y., & Lu, Y. (2002). Application of flexible pricing in business-to-business electronic commerce. IBM Systems Journal, 41(2), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Datamonitor (2007). eBay, Inc. SWOT Analysis; New York, NY: Datamonitor, (April 27, 2007), 1–8. http://www.datamonitor.com (accessed on June 25, 2007).

  19. U.S. Census Bureau (2006). Quarterly retail e-commerce sales 4th quarter 2006. http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/data/html/06Q4.html (accessed on September 27, 2007).

  20. Bapna, R., Goes, P., & Gupta, A. (2003). Analysis and design of business-to-consumer online auctions. Management Science, 49(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bapna, R., Goes, P., & Gupta, A. (2001). Insights and analysis of online auctions. Communications of the ACM, 44(11), 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Klemperer, P. (2002). What really matters in auction design. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gregg, D. G., & Scott, J. E. (2006). The role of reputation systems in reducing online auction fraud. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(4), 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Resnick, P., & Zeckhauser, R. (2002). Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. In M. R. Baye (Ed.) Advances in applied microeconomics : Vol. 11. The economics of the Internet and e-commerce (pp. 127–157). Amsterdam: JAI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/jarvenpaa.html (accessed June 24, 2007).

  26. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for ‘lemons’: quality under uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mishra, D. P., Heide, J. B., & Cort, S. G. (1998). Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(3), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fung, R., & Lee, M. (1999). E-commerce trust: exploring the antecedent factors. In Proceedings of the fifth Americas conference on information systems (pp. 517–519).

  30. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Managing user trust in B2C e-services. e-Service Journal, 2(2), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Tractinsky, N. (1999). Consumer trust in an Internet store: a cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue2/jarvenpaa.html (accessed June 24, 2007).

  32. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(12), 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koehn, D. (2003). The nature of and conditions for online trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Suh, B., & Han, I. (2003). The impact of consumer trust and perception of security control on the acceptance of electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 135–161.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. (2001). What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(6), 903–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kardes, F. R., Posavac, S. S., & Cronley, M. L. (2004). Consumer inference: a review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 230–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shapiro, C. (1982). Consumer information, product quality and seller reputation. Bell Journal of Economics, 13(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rao, A. R., & Monroe, M. (1996). Causes and consequences of price premiums. Journal of Business, 69(4), 511–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033–1049.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vishwanath, A., & Barnett, G. A. (2005). An empirical investigation into the structure of bidding in online auctions. Electronic Markets, 15(3), 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Koufaris, M., & Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004). The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Information Management, 41(3), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(4), 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mellinger, G. D. (1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 304–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lewicki, R. J., Mcallister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Howe, D. C. (2000). Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Ratnasingham, P. (1998). The importance of trust in electronic commerce. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 8(4), 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tan, Y. H., & Thoen, W. (2000/2001). Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(2), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  53. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 472–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure 1840-1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 53–112.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Aladwani, A. M., & Palvia, P. C. (2002). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived website quality. Information & Management, 39(6), 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2001a). Assessing the quality of auction websites. In Proc. of the Hawaii international conference on systems sciences (pp. 1–10).

  59. Chen, Q., & Wells, W. D. (1999). Attitude toward the site. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Iwaarden, J. V., Wiele, T. V. D., Ball, L., & Millen, R. (2004). Perceptions about the quality of web sites: a survey amongst students at Northeastern University and Erasmus University. Information & Management, 14(8), 947–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lin, J. C. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a Web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Liu, C., & Arnett, K. P. (2000). Exploring the factors associated with Web success in the context of electronic commerce. Information & Management, 38(1), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Loiacono, E. T., Watson, R. T., & Goodhue, D. L. (2007). WebQual: an instrument for consumer evaluation of web sites. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(3), 51–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhang, P., & von Dran, G. M. (2001/2002). User expectations and rankings of quality factors in different Web site domains. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhang, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2005). The role of anticipated emotions in the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 316–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Belanger, F., Hiller, J. S., & Smith, W. J. (2002). Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3/4), 245–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim, J., & Moon, J. Y. (1998). Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces - trustworthiness of cyber-banking interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 10(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. McKnight, D. H., Kacmar, C. J., & Choudhury, V. (2004). Shifting factors and the ineffectiveness of third party assurance seals: a two-stage model of initial trust in a web business. Electronic Markets, 14(3), 252–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Roy, M. C., Dewit, O., & Aubert, B. A. (2001). The impact of interface usability on trust in Web retailers. Internet Research Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(5), 388–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Designing trust into online experiences. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 57–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ippolito, P. M. (1990). Bonding and nonbonding signals of product quality. Journal of Business, 63(1), 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Farrell, J., & Gibbons, R. (1989). Cheap talk can matter in bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory, 48(1), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Crawford, V. P., & Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Rao, A. R., Qu, L., & Ruekert, R. W. (1999). Signaling unobservable product quality through brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Klein, B., & Leffler, K. (1981). The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Park, C. S., & Srinivasan, V. (1994). A survey-based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2001). Trust in Internet shopping: instrument development and validation through classical and modern approaches. Journal of Global Information Management, 9(3), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  82. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Straub, D., Boudreau, M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the AIS, 13(24), 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Butterfield, E. (May 2005). The spam filters learning curve. PC World, 86.

  85. Keelty, M. B. (2005). Bigfoot interactive consumer survey: less spam, more relevance in the inbox today than one year ago. Bigfoot Interactive (March 8, 2005). http://www.bigfootinteractive.com/site/pressroom/press_releases/pr2005/pr-03-08-05.htm (accessed September 17, 2005).

  86. Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Introduction understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Carmines, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt, & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: current issues (pp. 65–110). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Segars, A., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the AIS, 4(7), 1–79.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Hox, J. J., & Beechger, T. M. (1998). An introduction to structural equation modeling. Family Science Review, 4(11), 334–373.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron: The University of Akron Press.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Fornell, C. (1982). A second generation of multivariate analysis methods (Vol. 1). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Segars, A. H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25(1), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35(8), 942–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Palmer, J. W., Bailey, J. P., & Faraj, S. (2000). The role of intermediaries in the development of trust on the WWW: the use and prominence of trusted third parties and privacy statements. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(3). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue3/palmer.html (accessed October 25, 2006).

  98. Lee, H. G. (1998). Do electronic marketplaces lower the price of goods? Communications of the ACM, 41(1), 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Clemons, E. K. (2007). An empirical investigation of third-party seller rating systems in e-commerce: the case of buySAFE. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 43–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado Denver, P.O. Box 173364, Campus Box 165, Denver, CO, 80217-3364, USA

    Dawn G. Gregg & Steven Walczak

Authors
  1. Dawn G. Gregg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven Walczak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn G. Gregg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gregg, D.G., Walczak, S. The relationship between website quality, trust and price premiums at online auctions. Electron Commer Res 10, 1–25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9044-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-010-9044-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation