Skip to main content
Log in

Tsunami generation by submarine landslides: comparison of physical and numerical models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An idealised two-dimensional laboratory model of tsunamis generated by submarine landslides is described. The experimental configuration corresponds to the benchmark configuration suggested by other researchers in the international tsunami community. It comprises a semi-elliptical rigid landslide with a height to length ratio of 0.052 sliding down a 15° slope. The initial landslide submergence and specific gravity are varied, the second of which primarily determines the initial landslide acceleration. In these experiments the landslide motion is generally well approximated as consisting of two periods of constant acceleration. The first phase of positive acceleration finishes as the landslide reaches the base of the slope, while the second period of a slower deceleration continues until the landslide comes to rest along the horizontal base of the tank. A novel experimental technique, which utilises laser-induced fluorescence (LIF), is employed to measure the free surface displacement over the entire space and time domains. This enables the wave potential energy field to be computed directly and provides a vivid picture of the wave generation and development process. Particle tracking velocimetry provides detailed information on the landslide motion and also some data on the sub-surface velocity field. Experimental runs require multiple repeats (typically 35–50) of the same setup in order to capture the entire wave field with the desired resolution. Thus high level experimental repeatability is required, and this is demonstrated. A range of parameters relevant to hazard management are presented and discussed. Maximum crest and trough amplitudes of the offshore propagating waves are shown to be approximately proportional to the initial landslide acceleration and somewhat less strongly dependent on the initial landslide submergence. The maximum wave run-up experienced at the shoreline is shown to depend almost linearly on the magnitude of a high deceleration that occurs for a short period when the landslide nears the toe of the slope. The initial submergence and initial acceleration do not directly determine the maximum wave run-up, although for these experiments they impact indirectly on the magnitude of the deceleration. The efficiency of the energy transfer from the landslide potential energy to the wave field potential energy reaches values of up to 6% and is found to be strongly dependent on the initial submergence. However because of the link between the landslide mass and its acceleration, this efficiency is almost completely independent of the initial acceleration. The results from a numerical model based on linear, inviscid and irrotational wave theory, and solved with the boundary element method, are compared with the data from the experimental program. The numerical model accurately produces the generated sequence of wave crests and troughs, but slightly overpredicts their phase speed by between 2 and 4%. For all other parameters the numerical model predictions are within 25% of the experimental values, although this includes both under- and overprediction for the range of independent parameters covered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynett PJ, Borrero JC, Liu PLF, Synolakis CE (2003) Field survey and numerical simulations: a review of the 1998 papua new guinea tsunami. Pure Appl Geophys 160(10–11): 2119–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Horikawa K, Shuto N (1981) Tsunami disasters and protection measures in Japan. In: Iida L, Iwasaki T (eds) Tsunamis: their science and engineering. Proceedings of the international tsunami symposium, May 1981, Sendai-Ofunato-Kamaishi, Japan. Terra Scientific Publishing Company, pp 9–22

  3. Day SJ, Watts P, Grilli ST, Kirby JT (2005) Mechanical models of the 1975 kalapana, Hawaii earthquake and tsunami. Marine Geol 215(1–2 SPEC ISS): 59–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fine IV, Rabinovich AB, Bornhold BD, Thomson RE, Kulikov EA (2005) The grand banks landslide-generated tsunami of November 18, 1929: preliminary analysis and numerical modeling. Marine Geol 215(1–2 SPEC ISS): 45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fritz HM, Hager WH, Minor H-E (2004) Near field characteristics of landslide generated impulse waves. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 130(6): 287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Imamura F, Hashi K (2003) Re-examination of the source mechanism of the 1998 Papua New Guinea earthquake and tsunami. Pure Appl Geophys 160(10–11): 2071–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tinti S, Armigliato A, Manucci A, Pagnoni G, Zaniboni F, Yalciner AC, Altinok Y (2006) The generating mechanisms of the August 17, 1999 Izmit Bay (Turkey) tsunami: regional (tectonic) and local (mass instabilities) causes. Marine Geol 225(1–4): 311–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Synolakis CE, Bardet J-P, Davies HL, Okal EA, Silver EA, Sweet S, Tappin DR (2002) The slump origin of the 1998 Papua New Guinea tsunami. Proc R Soc Lond A 458: 763–

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiegel RL (1955) Laboratory studies of gravity waves generated by movement of submerged body. Am Geophys Union Trans 36(5): 759–774

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rzadkiewicz SA, Mariotti C, Heinrich P (1997) Numerical simulation of submarine landslides and their hydraulic effects. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 123(4): 149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Watts P (2000) Tsunami features of solid block underwater landslides. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 126(3): 144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Watts P (1998) Wavemaker curves for tsunamis generated by underwater landslides. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 124(3): 127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Watts P (1997) Water waves generated by underwater landslides. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA

  14. Watts P, Grilli ST (2003) Underwater landslide shape, motion, deformation, and tsunami generation. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference, 25 May 2003–30 May 2003, Honolulu, HI. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, pp 1709–1716

  15. Fritz HM, Hager WH, Minor HE (2003) Landslide generated impulse waves. 1. Instantaneous flow fields. Exp Fluids 35(6): 505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fritz HM, Hager WH, Minor HE (2003) Landslide generated impulse waves. 2. Hydrodynamic impact craters. Exp Fluids 35(6): 520–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fritz HM, Mohammed F, Yoo J (2009) Lituya Bay landslide impact generated mega-tsunami 50th anniversary. Pure and Applied Geophysics 166: 153–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang L, Leblond PH (1992) The coupling of a submarine slide and the surface-waves which it generates. J Geophys Res 97(C8): 12731–12744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suleimani E, Hansen R, Haeussler PJ (2009) Numerical study of tsunami generated by multiple submarine slope failures in Resurrection Bay, Alaska, during the m w 9.2 1964 earthquake. Pure Appl Geophys 166: 131–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heinrich P (1992) Nonlinear water-waves generated by submarine and aerial landslides. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 118(3): 249–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mariotti C, Heinrich P (1999) Modelling of submarine landslides of rock and soil. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 23(4): 335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tinti S, Bortolucci E (2000) Analytical investigation on tsunamis generated by submarine slides. Annali Di Geofisica 43(3): 519–536

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu PL-F, Lynett P, Synolakis CE (2003) Analytical solutions for forced long waves on a sloping beach. J Fluid Mech 478: 101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sammarco P, Renzi E (2008) Lanslide tsunamis propagating along a plane beach. J Fluid Mech 598: 107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Enet F, Grilli ST, Watts P (2003) Laboratory experiments for tsunamis generated by underwater landslides: comparison with numerical modeling. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference, 25 May 2003–30 May 2003, Honolulu, HI. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, pp 1717–1724

  26. Liu PLF, Wu TR, Raichlen F, Synolakis CE, Borrero JC (2005) Runup and rundown generated by three-dimensional sliding masses. J Fluid Mech 536: 107–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grilli ST, Watts P (2005) Tsunami generation by submarine mass failure. I: modeling, experimental validation and sensitivity analyses. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 131(6): 283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grilli ST, Kirby JT, Liu PLF, Brandes H, Fryer GJ (2003) Workshop on model validation and benchmarking for tsunami generation by submarine mass failure—proposal submitted to nsf. Honolulu, HI

  29. Watts P, Imamura F, Bengston A, Grilli ST (2001) Benchmark cases for tsunamis generated by underwater landslides. In: Proceedings of the fourth international symposium waves 2001, 2–6 Sep 2001, San Francisco, CA. Proceedings of the international symposium on ocean wave measurement and analysis. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp 1505–1514

  30. Imamura F, Imteaz MMA (1995) Long waves in two layers: governing equations and numerical model. Sci Tsunami Hazards 13(1): 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grilli ST, Subramanya R (1996) Numerical modeling of wave breaking induced by fixed or moving boundaries. Comput Mech 17(6): 374–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Walters R (2003) Tsunami runup: model development and testing. In: Briggs M, Koutitas C (eds) Long waves symposium, AUTh, Thessaloniki, Greece, 25–27 Aug 2003. pp 289–296

  33. Brebbia CA, Dominguez J (1992) Boundary elements—an introductory course. Computational Mechanics Publications and McGraw-Hill, Southhampton

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sue LP (2007) Modelling of tsunami generated by submarine landslides. PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

  35. Churchill Controls Ltd (1977) Wave monitor. Technical manual, Workingham, UK

  36. Nokes RI (2005) Imagestream v5.01: system theory and design. 5.01. Christchurch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nokes RI (2005) Fluidstream v6.01: system theory and design. 6.01. Christchurch, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. I. Nokes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sue, L.P., Nokes, R.I. & Davidson, M.J. Tsunami generation by submarine landslides: comparison of physical and numerical models. Environ Fluid Mech 11, 133–165 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9205-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-010-9205-9

Keywords

Navigation