Skip to main content
Log in

Photovoice: understanding high school females’ conceptions of mathematics and learning mathematics

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Photovoice is a participatory action research tool that is grounded in the literature for critical consciousness (Wang & Burris, 1997). Four creative high school girls who reported struggles with mathematics were given cameras and asked to take photographs to answer the following questions: (1) What is mathematics? (2) What is your ideal learning environment? (3) What things impede your learning of mathematics? Within-case and cross-case analyses of the photographs and interview responses were conducted. Each individual case was analyzed using the work of Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, and Tarule (Women’s Ways of Knowing, 1986) who investigated women’s epistemological perspectives. The girls were either silenced (disconnected from the mathematical knowledge of the teacher), received (lacked confidence to do mathematics independently), or “fragily” subjective (viewed mathematical knowledge as personal rather than imparted by the teacher) knowers of mathematics. The use of photovoice has the power to facilitate the nurturing of silence as it moves toward the “roar which is on the other side of silence” (Belenky et al., 1986, p. 4).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. R. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 163–174). Bristol, PA: Fulmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biklen, S. K., & Pollard, D. (2001). Feminist perspectives on gender in classrooms. In. V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 723–747). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

  • Bishop, W. (1993). Students’ stories and the variable gaze of composition research. In S. I. Fontaine & S. Hunter (Eds.), Writing ourselves into the story (pp. 197–214). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (1993). The role of contexts in the mathematics classroom: Do they make mathematics more “real”? For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., & Booth, W. (2003). In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 18, 431–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borasi, R. (1986). On the educational uses of error: Beyond diagnosis and remediation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

  • Borasi, R. (1991). Learning mathematics through inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borasi, R., & Siegel, M. (1989). Reading to learn mathematics: A new synthesis of the traditional basics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Burton, L. (2001). Mathematics? No thanks—Choosing and then rejecting mathematics. 5th Symposium conducted at the meeting on Gender Research, October, Kiel, Germany.

  • Burton, L. (2008). Moving towards a feminist epistemology of mathematics. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(4), 519–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1994). Telling teaching stories. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Kloosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 389–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, L. H., Tobin, D., & Brody, L. (1979). Sex-role socialization and achievement in mathematics. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Sex-related difference in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues (pp. 303–332). New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 210–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychology theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, M., & Haw, K. (2001). ‘Voice’, young people and action research. Educational Action Research, 9(3), 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, S. S. (2009). Social constructivism and the ‘Believing Game’: A mathematics teacher’s practice and its implications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, S. S., Lane, C., Mau, S. T., & Brass, A. (2009–2010). The ‘Believing Game’ in mathematics: Stories in a discipline of doubt. The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning, 15, 37–49 (Winter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A. H. (2004a). ‘Slaughtering this beautiful math’: Graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics. Gender and Equity, 16(3), 379–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A. H. (2004b). Becoming mathematicians: Women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 171–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman, P., Tassell, J. H., Ponniah, A. G., & Essex, N. K. (2001). Mathematics as a gendered domain in the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Seattle, WA.

  • Kohlberg, L. T. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. New York, NY: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeger, S., Burton, C., Comarata, A., Combs, C., Hamm, C., Hopkins, R., et al. (2004). Student voice and critical reflection: Helping students at risk. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 597–622). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, E. D. S., Eng, E., Randall-David, E., & Robinson, N. (2005). Quality-of-life concerns of African American breast cancer survivors within rural North Carolina: Blending the techniques of photovoice and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, A., & Peterat, L. (1988). Feminist pedagogies: From pedagogic romanticism to the success of authenticity. In P. Tancred-Sheriff (Ed.), Feminist research: Prospect and retrospect (pp. 80–95). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendick, H. (2002). ‘Why are we doing this?’ A case study of motivational practices in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the 26 th Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference, Norwich, CT, 3, 329–336.

  • Meyer, H., & Kroeger, S. (2005). Photovoice as an educational action research tool. Qualitative Research Journal, 5, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, V. R., & Moyer, P. S. (1999). Using metaphor of voice to investigate the mathematical experiences of African American students. In S. Berenson, K. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood, & L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2 (pp. 575–580). Columbus, OH.

  • NCES. (1997). Digest of education statistics, 1997 (NCES Publication No. 98-015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

  • NSF (National Science Foundation). (2000). Science and engineering indicators—2000. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povey, H., Angier, C., & Clarke, M. (2006). Storying Joanne, an undergraduate mathematician. Gender and Education, 18(5), 459–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, S. D., Hergenrather, K. C., Wilkin, A. M., & Jolly, C. (2008). Visions and voices: Indigent persons living with HIV in the Southern United States use photovoice to create knowledge, develop partnerships, and take action. Health Promotion Practice, 9, 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2010). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95, 458–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. F. (1994). Helping preservice teachers confront their conceptions about mathematics and mathematics teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

  • Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. A. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education & Behavior, 21, 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. C., & Redwood-Jones, Y. A. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint photovoice. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 560–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, D., & Meyer, H. (2005). Learning from our students: Photovoice and classroom action research. Science Education Review, 4, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, A. (2010). Revenge of the nerds: Computer engineers hijack the Barbie vote. The Wall Street Journal, April 20.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelly Sheats Harkness.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harkness, S.S., Stallworth, J. Photovoice: understanding high school females’ conceptions of mathematics and learning mathematics. Educ Stud Math 84, 329–347 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9485-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9485-3

Keywords

Navigation