Abstract
Photovoice is a participatory action research tool that is grounded in the literature for critical consciousness (Wang & Burris, 1997). Four creative high school girls who reported struggles with mathematics were given cameras and asked to take photographs to answer the following questions: (1) What is mathematics? (2) What is your ideal learning environment? (3) What things impede your learning of mathematics? Within-case and cross-case analyses of the photographs and interview responses were conducted. Each individual case was analyzed using the work of Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, and Tarule (Women’s Ways of Knowing, 1986) who investigated women’s epistemological perspectives. The girls were either silenced (disconnected from the mathematical knowledge of the teacher), received (lacked confidence to do mathematics independently), or “fragily” subjective (viewed mathematical knowledge as personal rather than imparted by the teacher) knowers of mathematics. The use of photovoice has the power to facilitate the nurturing of silence as it moves toward the “roar which is on the other side of silence” (Belenky et al., 1986, p. 4).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
Becker, J. R. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 163–174). Bristol, PA: Fulmer Press.
Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Biklen, S. K., & Pollard, D. (2001). Feminist perspectives on gender in classrooms. In. V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 723–747). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Bishop, W. (1993). Students’ stories and the variable gaze of composition research. In S. I. Fontaine & S. Hunter (Eds.), Writing ourselves into the story (pp. 197–214). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Boaler, J. (1993). The role of contexts in the mathematics classroom: Do they make mathematics more “real”? For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 12–17.
Booth, T., & Booth, W. (2003). In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disability and Society, 18, 431–442.
Borasi, R. (1986). On the educational uses of error: Beyond diagnosis and remediation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
Borasi, R. (1991). Learning mathematics through inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
Borasi, R., & Siegel, M. (1989). Reading to learn mathematics: A new synthesis of the traditional basics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Burton, L. (2001). Mathematics? No thanks—Choosing and then rejecting mathematics. 5th Symposium conducted at the meeting on Gender Research, October, Kiel, Germany.
Burton, L. (2008). Moving towards a feminist epistemology of mathematics. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(4), 519–528.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1994). Telling teaching stories. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21, 145–158.
Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Kloosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 389–420.
Fox, L. H., Tobin, D., & Brody, L. (1979). Sex-role socialization and achievement in mathematics. In M. A. Wittig & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Sex-related difference in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues (pp. 303–332). New York, NY: Academic.
Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 210–240.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychology theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hadfield, M., & Haw, K. (2001). ‘Voice’, young people and action research. Educational Action Research, 9(3), 485–502.
Harkness, S. S. (2009). Social constructivism and the ‘Believing Game’: A mathematics teacher’s practice and its implications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 243–258.
Harkness, S. S., Lane, C., Mau, S. T., & Brass, A. (2009–2010). The ‘Believing Game’ in mathematics: Stories in a discipline of doubt. The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning, 15, 37–49 (Winter).
Herzig, A. H. (2004a). ‘Slaughtering this beautiful math’: Graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics. Gender and Equity, 16(3), 379–395.
Herzig, A. H. (2004b). Becoming mathematicians: Women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 171–214.
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
Kloosterman, P., Tassell, J. H., Ponniah, A. G., & Essex, N. K. (2001). Mathematics as a gendered domain in the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Seattle, WA.
Kohlberg, L. T. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. New York, NY: Academic.
Kroeger, S., Burton, C., Comarata, A., Combs, C., Hamm, C., Hopkins, R., et al. (2004). Student voice and critical reflection: Helping students at risk. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 50–57.
Leder, G. C. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 597–622). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Lopez, E. D. S., Eng, E., Randall-David, E., & Robinson, N. (2005). Quality-of-life concerns of African American breast cancer survivors within rural North Carolina: Blending the techniques of photovoice and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 99–115.
Martel, A., & Peterat, L. (1988). Feminist pedagogies: From pedagogic romanticism to the success of authenticity. In P. Tancred-Sheriff (Ed.), Feminist research: Prospect and retrospect (pp. 80–95). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Mendick, H. (2002). ‘Why are we doing this?’ A case study of motivational practices in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the 26 th Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference, Norwich, CT, 3, 329–336.
Meyer, H., & Kroeger, S. (2005). Photovoice as an educational action research tool. Qualitative Research Journal, 5, 185–194.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moody, V. R., & Moyer, P. S. (1999). Using metaphor of voice to investigate the mathematical experiences of African American students. In S. Berenson, K. Dawkins, M. Blanton, W. Coulombe, J. Kolb, K. Norwood, & L. Stiff (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2 (pp. 575–580). Columbus, OH.
NCES. (1997). Digest of education statistics, 1997 (NCES Publication No. 98-015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
NSF (National Science Foundation). (2000). Science and engineering indicators—2000. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Povey, H., Angier, C., & Clarke, M. (2006). Storying Joanne, an undergraduate mathematician. Gender and Education, 18(5), 459–471.
Rhodes, S. D., Hergenrather, K. C., Wilkin, A. M., & Jolly, C. (2008). Visions and voices: Indigent persons living with HIV in the Southern United States use photovoice to create knowledge, develop partnerships, and take action. Health Promotion Practice, 9, 159–169.
Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2010). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95, 458–476.
Steele, D. F. (1994). Helping preservice teachers confront their conceptions about mathematics and mathematics teaching and learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. A. (1994). Empowerment through photo novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education & Behavior, 21, 171–186.
Wang, C. C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24, 369–387.
Wang, C. C., & Redwood-Jones, Y. A. (2001). Photovoice ethics: Perspectives from Flint photovoice. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 560–572.
Whitfield, D., & Meyer, H. (2005). Learning from our students: Photovoice and classroom action research. Science Education Review, 4, 97–105.
Zimmerman, A. (2010). Revenge of the nerds: Computer engineers hijack the Barbie vote. The Wall Street Journal, April 20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harkness, S.S., Stallworth, J. Photovoice: understanding high school females’ conceptions of mathematics and learning mathematics. Educ Stud Math 84, 329–347 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9485-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9485-3