Abstract
Curriculum documents for mathematics emphasise the importance of promoting depth of knowledge rather than shallow coverage of the curriculum. In this paper, we report on a study that explored the analysis of junior secondary mathematics textbooks to assess their potential to assist in teaching and learning aimed at building and applying deep mathematical knowledge. The method of analysis involved the establishment of a set of specific curriculum goals and associated indicators, based on research into the teaching and learning of a particular field within the mathematics curriculum, namely proportion and proportional reasoning. Topic selection was due to its pervasive nature throughout the school mathematics curriculum at this level. As a result of this study, it was found that the five textbook series examined provided limited support for the development of multiplicative structures required for proportional reasoning, and hence would not serve well the development of deep learning of mathematics. The study demonstrated a method that could be applied to the analysis of junior secondary mathematics in many parts of the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Middle grades mathematics textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. http://www.project2061.org/publications/textbook/mgmth/report/part1.htm. Accessed 14 Nov 2009.
Behr, M., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio and proportion. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296–333). New York: Macmillan.
Bell, A. (1993). Principles for the design of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 5–34.
Budiansky, S. (2001). The trouble with textbooks. ASEE Prism, 10, 24–27.
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 287–311.
Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1992). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications. In D. T. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grade mathematics (pp. 159–178). New York: Macmillan.
Department for Education and Employment (DfE). (1999). Mathematics—the new national curriculum for England. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Dole, S., & Shield, M. (2008). The capacity of two Australian eighth-grade textbooks for promoting proportional reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 19–35.
English, L., & Halford, G. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 61–75.
Fisher, L. C. (1988). Strategies used by secondary mathematics teachers to solve proportion problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 157–168.
Grant, T. J., Kline, K., & Weinhold, M. (2002). What do elementary teachers learn from reform mathematics textbooks? In: D. S. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. Y. White, H. G. Wiegel, R. L. Bryant, & K. Nooney (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3 (pp. 1505–1513). Athens, GA.
Hart, K. (1981). Ratio and proportion. In K. Hart, M. Brown, D. Kuchemann, D. Kerslake, G. Ruddock, & M. McCartney (Eds.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16 (pp. 88–101). London: John Murray.
Howson, G. (2005). “Meaning” and school mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, C. Hoyles, O. Skovsmose, & P. Valero (Eds.), Meaning in mathematics education (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Springer.
Lamon, S. (2006). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principals and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Curriculum Board. (2009). Shape of the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Maths.pdf. 20 Nov 2010.
Pehkonen, L. (2004). The magic circle of the textbook—an option or an obstacle for teacher change. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 513–520). Bergen: PME.
Queensland Studies Authority. (2004). Mathematics: years 1 to 10 syllabus. Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority.
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourth-grade teachers’ use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 331–350.
Rezat, S. (2009). The utilization of mathematics textbooks as instruments for learning. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME6, Lyon France. http://www.inrp.fr/editions/cerme6. 15 July 2011.
Schmidt, W. H. (2012). Measuring content through textbooks: the cumulative effect of middle-school tracking. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 143–160). Dordrecht: Springer.
Stacey, K. (2003). The need to increase attention to mathematical reasoning. In H. Hollingsworth, J. Lokan, & B. McCrae (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in Australia: Results from the TIMMS 1999 video study (pp. 119–122). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Straesser, R. (2009). Instruments for learning and teaching mathematics: An attempt to theorise about the role of textbooks, computers and other artefacts to teach and learn mathematics. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 67–81). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
Straesser, R. (2012). Foreword. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. v–vii). Dordrecht: Springer.
Thomson, S., & Fleming, N. (2004). Summing it up: Mathematics achievement in Australian schools in TIMSS 2002. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 181–204.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book—using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute Cd-Rom for ICME9. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
Van Dooren, W., DeBock, D., Hessels, A., Janssens, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2005). Not everything is proportional: Effects of age and problem type on propensities for overgeneralisation. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 57–86.
Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 127–174). Orlando, FL: Academic.
Vincent, J., & Stacey, K. (2008). Do mathematics textbooks cultivate shallow teaching? Applying the TIMSS video study criteria to Australian eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(1), 81–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shield, M., Dole, S. Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning. Educ Stud Math 82, 183–199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9415-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9415-9