Abstract
From preliminary analysis of teacher-nominated examples of successful technology-supported practice in secondary-school mathematics, the use of graphing software to teach about algebraic forms was identified as being an important archetype. Employing evidence from lesson observation and teacher interview, such practice was investigated in greater depth through case study of two teachers each teaching two lessons of this type. The practitioner model developed in earlier research (Ruthven & Hennessy, Educational Studies in Mathematics 49(1):47–88, 2002; Micromath 19(2):20–24, 2003) provided a framework for synthesising teacher thinking about the contribution of graphing software. Further analysis highlighted the crucial part played by teacher prestructuring and shaping of technology-and-task-mediated student activity in realising the ideals of the practitioner model. Although teachers consider graphing software very accessible, successful classroom use still depends on their inducting students into using it for mathematical purposes, providing suitably prestructured lesson tasks, prompting strategic use of the software by students and supporting mathematical interpretation of the results. Accordingly, this study has illustrated how, in the course of appropriating the technology, teachers adapt their classroom practice and develop their craft knowledge: particularly by establishing a coherent resource system that effectively incorporates the software; by adapting activity formats to exploit new interactive possibilities; by extending curriculum scripts to provide for proactive structuring and responsive shaping of activity; and by reworking lesson agendas to take advantage of the new time economy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amarel, M. (1983). Classrooms and computers as instructional settings. Theory into Practice, 22, 260–266.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245–274. doi:10.1023/A:1022103903080.
Assude, T. (2005). Time management in the work economy of a class. A case study: integration of Cabri in primary school mathematics teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 59(1–3), 183–203. doi:10.1007/s10649-005-5888-0.
Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Burns, R. B., & Anderson, L. W. (1987). The activity structure of lesson segments. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 31–53. doi:10.2307/1179376.
Burns, R. B., & Lash, A. A. (1986). A comparison of activity structures during basic skills and problem-solving instruction in seventh-grade mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 393–414.
Caliskan-Dedeoglu, N. (2006). Usages de la géométrie dynamique par des enseignants de collège. Des potentialités à la mise en oeuvre: quelles motivations, quelles pratiques. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Paris 7.
Department for Education and Employment [DfEE] (2001). Key stage 3 national strategy: framework for teaching mathematics. London: DfEE.
Department for Education and Skills [DfES] (2003). Integrating ICT into mathematics at key stage 3. London: DfES.
Doerr, H., & Zangor, R. (2000). Creating meaning for and with the graphing calculator. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 143–163. doi:10.1023/A:1003905929557.
Farrell, A. M. (1996). Roles and behaviors in technology-integrated precalculus classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(1), 33–53. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90038-3.
Fey, J. (1989). Technology and mathematics education: a survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 237–272. doi:10.1007/BF00310873.
Godwin, S., & Sutherland, R. (2004). Whole-class technology for learning mathematics: the case of functions and graphs. Education Communication and Information, 4(1), 131–152. doi:10.1080/1463631042000210953.
Guin, D., Ruthven, K., & Trouche, L. (Eds.) (2005). The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. New York: Springer.
Jenson, J., & Rose, C. B. (2006). Finding space for technology: pedagogical observations on the organization of computers in school environments. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(1). Accessed at http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol32.1/jenson.html
Lagrange, J.-B., & Caliskan-Dedeoglu, N. (2009). Usages de la technologie dans des conditions ordinaires: le cas de la géométrie dynamique au collège: Potentialités, attentes, pratiques. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, in press.
Leinhardt, G. (1988). Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (pp. 146–168). London: Falmer.
Leinhardt, G., Putnam, T., Stein, M. K., & Baxter, J. (1991). Where subject knowledge matters. Advances in Research in Teaching, 2, 87–113.
Leinhardt, G., Weidman, C., & Hammond, K. M. (1987). Introduction and integration of classroom routines by expert teachers. Curriculum Inquiry, 17(2), 135–176. doi:10.2307/1179622.
Monaghan, J. (2004). Teachers’ activities in technology-based mathematics lessons. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 327–357. doi:10.1007/s10758-004-3467-6.
Office for Standards in Education [OfStEd] (2004). ICT in schools—the impact of government initiatives: secondary mathematics. London: OfStEd.
Ruthven, K. (2002). Instrumenting mathematical activity: reflections on key studies of the educational use of computer algebra systems. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 275–291. doi:10.1023/A:1022108003988.
Ruthven, K. (2007). Teachers, technologies and the structures of schooling. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, pp. 52–67.
Ruthven, K. (2008). Towards a naturalistic conceptualisation of technology integration in classroom practice: the example of school mathematics. Education & Didactique. http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/people/staff/ruthven.
Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2002). A practitioner model of the use of computer-based tools and resources to support mathematics teaching and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(1), 47–88. doi:10.1023/A:1016052130572.
Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Successful ICT use in secondary mathematics—a teacher perspective. Micromath, 19(2), 20–24.
Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Brindley, S. (2004). Teacher representations of the successful use of computer-based tools and resources in secondary-school English, Mathematics and Science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 259–275. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.002.
Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2005). Incorporating dynamic geometry systems into secondary mathematics education: didactical perspectives and practices of teachers. In D. Wright (Ed.), Moving on with dynamic geometry (pp. 138–158). Association of Teachers of Mathematics: Derby.
Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: a study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers & Education, 51(1), 297–317. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.013.
Simmt, E. (1997). Graphing calculators in high school mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16(2/3), 269–289.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.),Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104–124). London: Cassell.
Acknowledgements
Particular thanks are due to the teacher colleagues featured in the case studies; to Theresa Daly our project secretary; and to the UK Economic and Social Research Council which funded the Eliciting Situated Expertise in ICT-integrated Mathematics and Science Teaching project (R000239823). An earlier report of this study was presented at the November 2008 day-conference of the British Society for Research in Learning Mathematics: we are grateful to the BSRLM audience as well as to the ESM editor and reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruthven, K., Deaney, R. & Hennessy, S. Using graphing software to teach about algebraic forms: a study of technology-supported practice in secondary-school mathematics. Educ Stud Math 71, 279–297 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9176-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9176-7