Abstract
The goal of this paper is to explore qualities of mathematical imagination in light of a classroom episode. It is based on the analysis of a classroom interaction in a high school Algebra class. We examine a sequence of nine utterances enacted by one of the students whom we call Carlene. Through these utterances Carlene illustrates, in our view, two phenomena: (1) juxtaposing displacements, and (2) articulating necessary cases. The discussion elaborates on the significance of these phenomena and draws relationships with the perspectives of embodied cognition and intersubjectivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 9 (Special issue on semiotics, culture and mathematical thinking), 267–299.
Casey, E. (1979). Imagining. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Ferrara, F. (2006). Remembering and Imagining: Moving back and forth between motion and its representation. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká & N. Stehlíková (Eds.) Proceedings of the Thirtieth Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 3, pp. 65–72). Prague: Charles University
Gallese, V. (2003). The roots of empathy: The shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology, 36(4), 171–180. doi:10.1159/000072786.
Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below ‘theory of mind’: Embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362(1480), 659–669. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2002.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 455–479. doi:10.1080/02643290442000310.
Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy—First Book (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Noble, T. (2007). Body Motion and Physics: How elementary school students use gesture and action to make sense of the physical world. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Radford, L. (2006). Elements of a cultural theory of objectification. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 9 (Special Issue on Semiotics, Culture and Mathematical Thinking), 103–129.
Radford, L., Bardini, C., Sabena, C., Diallo, P., & Simbagoye, A. (2005). On embodiment, artifacts, and signs: A semiotic–cultural perspective on mathematical thinking. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 113–122). Melbourne, Australia.
Robutti, O. (2006). Motion, technology, gesture in interpreting graphs. International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 13, 117–126.
Roth, W.-M., & Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 103–136. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<103::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-G.
Sabena, C. (2007). Body and signs: A multimodal semiotic approach to teaching–learning processes in early calculus. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Università degli Studi di Torino, Torino.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by the Math in Motion project (NSF REC-0087573). Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation. We would like to thank the students in Mr. Barros’s class for all that they have taught us. We would also like to thank the members of the “Math in Motion” group, Djalita Oliveira-Ramos for her help in translating and analyzing the data for this paper, and Laurie Edwards for her feedback on a previous version. We extend our acknowledgements to three anonymous reviewers and Luis Radford for their invaluable feedback
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nemirovsky, R., Ferrara, F. Mathematical imagination and embodied cognition. Educ Stud Math 70, 159–174 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9150-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9150-4