Abstract
Simplicity arguments are to be found in most geometrical works, from those of Proclus in his Commentaries on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements, up to those of contemporary manuals. Our goal is to read these arguments in their historical contexts to analyze agreements, disagreements and the multiplicity of points of view. For a better apprehension and a better understanding of the different conceptions, we will focus on the notion of angles and their measurements. We will study the notion of ≪ simplicity ≫ in various Elements of Geometry, in particular those of Euclid, Peletier du Mans (1628), Arnauld (1667), Lacroix (1803) and Hoüel (1867). From there, we will examine French schoolbooks of geometry, beginning from the 1960s up to the 1990s, including those of the so-called period of ≪la réforme des mathématiques modernes≫ in France.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnauld, A. (1667). Nouveaux éléments de géométrie. Paris: Charles Savreux.
Arnauld, A., & Nicole, P. (1683). La logique ou l’art de penser, 5th ed. Paris: Guillaume Desprez.
Barbin, E. (1989). Les effets pervers de la Réforme des “Mathématiques Modernes”. Société Française, 33, 26–28.
Barbin, E. (1995). Mathematical proof, history, epistemology and teaching. In M. K. Siu (Ed.), Retrospect and outlook on mathematics education in Hong Kong (189–214).
Bkouche, R. (1997). Épistemologie, histoire et enseignement des mathématiques. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1).
Boll, M., & Reinhart, J. (1962). La synthèse logique des résultats et des recherches. In F. le Lionnais (Ed.), Les grands courants de la pensée mathématique. Paris: Blanchard.
Bourbaki, N. (1962). L’architecture des mathematiques. In F. le Lionnais (Ed.), Les grands courants de la pensée mathématique. Paris: Blanchard.
Choquet, G. (1964). L’enseignement de la géométrie. Paris: Hermann.
Deledicq, A., & Lassave, C. (1986). Faire des mathématiques, 6e. Paris: Cedic Nathan.
Delord, R., & Vinrich, G. (1996). Math 6e. Paris; Hachette Éducation.
Descartes, R. (1985). Rules for the direction of the mind. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol I. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Euclid (1956). The Thirteen Books of Euclid’s Elements, translated by Thomas L. Heath, 2nd ed. New York: Dover Publications.
Hoüel, J. (1867). Essai critique sur les principes fondamentaux de la géométrie élémentaire. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
Lacroix, S. (1803). Éléments de géométrie a l’usage de l’école centrale des quatre-nations. Paris: Courcier.
Lebossé, C., & Hémery, C. Arithmétique, algèbre et géométrie, classe de quatrième. Paris: Fernand Nathan.
Mauguin, A. (1977). Mathématiques, classe de sixième. Paris: Istra.
Peletier du Mans, J. (1628). Les six premiers livres des éléments géométriques d’Euclide avec les démonstrations. Lyon: Tournes.
Proclus (1873). Procli Diadochi in primum Euclidis Elementorum librum Commentarii. In G. Friedlein, B.G. Teubner (Eds.), Lipsiae.
Volkert, K. (1986). Die Krise der Anschauung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barbin, E. On the argument of simplicity in Elements and schoolbooks of Geometry. Educ Stud Math 66, 225–242 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9074-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9074-9