This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alibali, M.W., Kita, S. and Young, A.J. 2000, ‘Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture’, Language and Cognitive Processes 15(6), 593–613.
Ball, D.L. 1992, ‘Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education’, American Educator Summer, 14–47.
Bartolini Bussi, M.G. 1996, ‘Mathematical discussion and perspective drawing in primary school’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 31(1–2), 11–41.
Borba, M.C. and Penteado, M.G. 2001, ‘Informática e Educação Matemática, Coleção Tendências em Educação Matemática’, Autêntica, Belo Horizonte.
Brousseau, G. 1997, Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Chazan, D. and Schnepp, M. 2002, ‘Methods, goals, beliefs, commitments, and manner in teaching: Dialogue against a Calculus backdrop’, in J. Brophy (ed.), Social Constructivist Teaching, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, Vol. 9, pp. 171–195.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E. and Wood, T. 1992, ‘A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 21(1), 2–33.
Confrey, J. and Smith, E. 1994, ‘Comments on James Kaput’s Chapter’, in A.H. Schoenfeld (ed.), Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp. 172–192.
Decety, J. 1996a, ‘Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?’, Cognitive Brain Research 3(2), 75–86.
Decety, J. 1996b, ‘The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery’, Behavioral and brain research 77, 45–52.
Edwards, L.D. 2003, ‘A natural history of mathematical gesture’, Proceedings of the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Chicago, April 2003.
Ferrara, F. and Robutti, O. 2002, ‘Approaching graphs with motion experiences’, in A.D. Cockbrun and E. Nardi (eds.), Proceedings of PME, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 121–128.
Kaput, J. 1993, ‘The urgent need for proleptic research in the representation of quantitative relationships’, in T. Romberg, E. Fennema et al. (eds.), Integrating Research on the Graphical Representation of Functions, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 279–312.
Kitcher, P. 1983, The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford University, Oxford.
Lakoff, G. and Núñez, R. 2000, Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being, Basic Books, New York.
Lesh, R., Post, T. and Behr, M. 1987, ‘Dienes revisited: Multiple embodiments in computer environments’, in I. Wirszup and R. Streit (Eds.), Developments in School Mathematics Education Around the World (pp. 647–681). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
McNeill, D. 1992, Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought, Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
Meira, L. 1998, ‘Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in mathematical activity’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29(2), 121-142.
Monk, S. and Nemirovsky, R. 1994, ‘The case of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes’, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education 4, 139–168.
Nemirovsky, R. 1993, ‘Students making sense of chaotic behavior’, Interactive Learning Environments 3, 151–175.
Nemirovsky, R. and Tinker, R. 1993, ‘Exploring chaos: A case study’, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 12, 47–57.
Noble, T., Nemirovsky, R., DiMattia, C. and Wright, T. 2004, ‘Learning to see: Making sense of the mathematics of change in middle school’, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 9(2), 109–167.
Poincar’e, H. 1905/1952, Science and Hypothesis, Dover Publications, New York, NY.
Polanyi, M. 1958, Personal Knowledge, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Rabardel, P. 1995, Les hommes et les technologies, Armand Colin, Paris.
Radford, L., Demers, S., Guzmán, J. and Cerulli, M. 2003, ‘Calculators, graphs, gestures and the production of meaning’, in N.A. Pateman, B.J. Dougherty and J. Zilliox (eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA, Vol. 4, pp. 55–62.
Ryle, G. 1949, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.
Schnepp, M. and Nemirovsky, R. 2001, ‘Constructing a foundation for the fundamental theorem of calculus’, in A. Cuoco (ed.), The Role of Representation in School Mathematics, NCTM, Reston, VA, pp. 90–102.
Schoenfeld, A. 1990, ‘Making an informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics’, in J. Voss, D. Perkins and J. Segal (eds.), Informal Reasoning and Education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Slavit, D. 1997, ‘An alternate route to reification of function’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 33, 259–281.
Teasley, S.D. and Roschelle, J. 1993, ‘Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge’, in S.P. Lajoie and S.J. Derry (eds.), Computer as Cognitive Tools, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 229–258.
Thom, R. 1973, ‘Modern mathematics: Does it exist?’, in A.G. Howson (ed.), Developments in mathematics education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 194–209.
Thomas, N.J.T. 1999, ‘Are theories of imagery theories of imagination: An active perception approach to conscious mental content’, Cognitive Science 23(2), 207–245.
Tikhomirov, O.K. 1981, ‘The psychological consequences of computerization’, in J.V. Wertsch (ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology, Sharpe Inc, New York, pp. 256–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nemirovsky, R., Borba, M., Dimattia, C. et al. PME Special Issue: Bodily Activity and Imagination in Mathematics Learning. Educ Stud Math 57, 303–321 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-004-5933-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-004-5933-4