Skip to main content
Log in

Interdisciplinary Perspectives Inspiring a New Generation of Cognitive Load Research

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This special issue consists of six theoretical papers and an introduction. Each paper describes a current advance to the applications and focus of cognitive load theory (CLT). Four of the papers use an interdisciplinary approach outside of educational psychology by combining CLT with elements of evolutionary biology, mirror neuron research, cognitive brain science, and the philosophy of science. The remaining two papers use an intradisciplinary approach within educational psychology by applying CLT to self-regulation and heuristic learning. This paper introduces CLT, overviews each contribution, and summarizes the main themes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. W. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70, 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007a). Making instructional animations more effective: A cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 695–700. doi:10.1002/acp.1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007b). Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 811–820. doi:10.1002/acp.1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2005). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 135–146). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P., & van Gog, T. (2008). State of the art research into cognitive load theory. Computers in Human Behavior, in press.

  • Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2008). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, in press.

  • Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01003922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. (2005). The origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In J. S. Carlson, & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on contemporary educational issues (pp. 1–99). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Cierniak, G. (2008). The scientific value of cognitive load theory: A research agenda based on the structuralist view of theories. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9096-1.

  • Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Schuh, J. (2008). Information comparisons in example-based hypertext environments: Supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 73–92. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9068-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Corbalan, G. (2007). Designing support to facilitate learning in powerful electronic learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1047–1054. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F. & Kirschner, P. A. (2008). A Cognitive-load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2.

  • Maertens, M., & Pollmann, S. (2005). FMRI reveals a common neural substrate of illusory and real contours in V1 after perceptual learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1553–1564. doi:10.1162/089892905774597209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 11, 256–265. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, E., & Sweller, J. (1985). What do students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 272–284. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8. doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (2005). The worked-out-example principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 229–246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., Hilbert, T. & Schworm, S. (2008). Example-based learning in heuristic domains: A cognitive load theory account. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9093-4.

  • Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: When instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers & Education, 46, 426–445. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9–31. doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021808.72598.4d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2008). Cognitive bases of human creativity. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9091-6.

  • Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., & Sweller, S. (2006). Natural information processing systems. Ecological Psychology, 4, 434–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–295. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: can it facilitate? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57, 247–262. doi:10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gog, T., Paas, F. Marcus, N., Ayres, P. & Sweller, J. (2008). The mirror-neuron system and observational learning: Implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9094-3.

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on Cognitive Load Theory and it’s Design Implications for E-Learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5–13. doi:10.1007/BF02504793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2008). Towards a synthesis of cognitive load theory, Four-component instructional design, and self-directed learning. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9092-5.

  • Wong, A., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., Smith, L., Cooper, G.A., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2008). Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior, in press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors greatly acknowledge the contributions of Robert Atkinson, Richard Catrambone, Peter Gerjets, Harry O’Neil, Alexander Renkl, Remy Rikers, Katharina Scheiter, Wolfgang Schnotz, Dominique Sluijsmans, Mike Spector, John Sweller, Tamara van Gog, and Pieter Wouters, who acted as reviewers on this special issue.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Paas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayres, P., Paas, F. Interdisciplinary Perspectives Inspiring a New Generation of Cognitive Load Research. Educ Psychol Rev 21, 1–9 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9090-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9090-7

Keywords

Navigation