Abstract
This chapter outlines Piaget’s Stage Theory of Cognitive Development and its application in a teacher training institute involving graduate physics trainee teachers predicted to operate at the formal operational stage. It is presumed that, at this stage, having assimilated and accommodated logical understanding from the concrete stage, the trainees have a good articulation of theoretical, combinatorial and proportional reasoning. In this study, an attempt has been made to investigate this hypothesis through a case study involving six physics trainee teachers. The trainees were assigned a written task on the motion of a golf ball after which they were required to verbalise their reasoning patterns during individual oral presentations. The trainees demonstrated adequate theoretical reasoning but lacked combinatorial and proportional reasoning patterns. We opine that teacher training institutions should design programmes that make provision for the interconnection of concrete and formal operational stages into a cyclical mode so as to promote reflective practices in trainees.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barouillet, P. N. (2015). Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Developmental Review, 1–12.
Bastable, S. B., & Dart, M. A. (2008). Developmental stages of the learner. In S. B. Bastable (Ed.), Nurse as educator: Principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice (pp. 165–216). London: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Beilin, H., & Pufall, P. (1992). Piaget’s theory. New Jersey: Erbaulm.
Bholoa, A., Walshe, G., & Ramma, Y. (2017). Curriculum implications of the integration of mathematics into science. In K. S. Taber, & B. Akpan. Science education. New directions in mathematics and science education (pp. 211–220). Rotherham: Sense Publishers. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-94-6300-749-8_16.
Bitner, B. L. (1991). Formal operational reasoning modes: Predictors of critical thinking abilities and grades assigned by teachers in science and mathematics for students in grades nine to twelve. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 275–285.
Diamond, B. S., Maeten-Rivera, J., Rohrer, R. E., & Lee, O. (2014). Effectiveness of a curricular and professional development intervention at improving elementary teachers’ science content knowledge and student achievement outcomes: Year 1 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 635–658.
Eggen, P. D., & Kauchal, D. P. (2000). Educational psyhology: Windows on classroom (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Feldman, R. S. (2001). Child development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 331–351.
Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1, 69–82.
Lawson, A. E., & Snitgen, D. A. (1982). Teaching formal reasoning in a college biology course for preservice teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(19), 233–248.
Lutz, S., & Huitt, W. (2004). Connecting cognitive development and constructivism: Implications from theory for instruction and assessment. Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 9(1), 67–90.
Michael, A. (2014). Misconception in primary science. Berkshire: Mc Graw-Hill.
Nixon, R. S., Campbell, B. K., & Luft, J. A. (2016). Effects of subject-area degree and classroom experience on new chemistry teachers’ subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1636–1654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1204482.
Satterly, D. (1987). Piaget and education. In L. R. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seltman, M., & Seltman, P. (2006). Piaget’s logic: A critique of genetic epistemology. London: Routledge.
Thomas, R. M. (1992). Comparing theories of child development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company Inc.
Tom, A. R. (1997). Redesigning teacher education. New York: State University of New York Press.
Valanides, C. N. (2006). Formal reasoning and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2), 99–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Recommended Resources
Recommended Resources
Lourenci, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget’s theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103(1), 143–264.
Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piaget’s theory of cognitive development to Mathematics instruction. The Mathematics Educator, 18(1), 26–30.
Scholnick, E. K. (1999). Conceptual development: Piaget’s legacy. New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaulm Associates.
Young, G. (2011). Development and causality: Neo-Piagetian perspectives. New York: Springer.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oogarah-Pratap, B., Bholoa, A., Ramma, Y. (2020). Stage Theory of Cognitive Development—Jean Piaget. In: Akpan, B., Kennedy, T.J. (eds) Science Education in Theory and Practice. Springer Texts in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-43619-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-43620-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)