Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Nurturing Kindergarteners’ Early STEM Academic Identity Through Makerspace Pedagogy

  • Published:
Early Childhood Education Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children’s attitudes about STEM are formed early. As such, the ecology of early childhood classrooms can either afford or deny access to relevant experiences that help children nurture early self-understandings and ways of positioning themselves in relation to STEM. This early positioning and the funds of identity they afford are critical to early STEM academic identity development. While Fasso and Knight (2020) offer Makerspace Pedagogy for fostering identity development, Marsh et al. (2017) note a lack of wide-spread application and related research on deliberate employment of Makerspace Pedagogy in early childhood classrooms. To address this gap and to explore the adoption of Makerspace pedagogy in an early public-school setting, a university research team joined with a kindergarten teacher to pilot an emergent curriculum focused on tinkering and making. Initial findings suggest that design-based activities may support kindergartners taking on the role of STEM practitioners, that Makerspace activities seem to help produce a syncretism of early STEM and multimodal literacy practices and that Makerspace Pedagogy may offer a unique opportunity to explore the intersection of various aspects of children’s early identity formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bassok, D., Latham, S., & Rorem, A. (2016). Is kindergarten the new first grade?. AERA Open. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2332858415616358

  • Beier, M. E., & Rittmayer, A. D. (2008). Literature Overview: Motivational factors in STEM: Interest and self-concept. SWE-AWE-CASEE ARP Resources. Retrieved from: https://www.engr.psu.edu/AWE/misc/ARPs/ARP_SelfConcept_Overview_122208.pdf

  • Bezemer, J., Diamantopoulou, S., Jewitt, C., Kress, G., & Mavers, D. (2012). Using a social semiotic approach to multimodality: Researching learning in schools, Museums and Hospitals. NCRM Working paper. Retrieved from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2258/4/NCRM_working_paper_0112.pdf

  • Blikstein, P. (2013). Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In J. Walter-Herrmann & C. Büching (Eds.), FabLab: Of machines, makers and inventors. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein, P., & Worsley, M. (2016). The Maker Movement: The last chance of progressive education? In K. Peppler, E. Halverson, & Y. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 1). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogs. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6, 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merril, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strass. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crespo, M. N., Kraatz, E., & Pallansch, L. (2014). From fearing STEM to playing with it: The natural integration of STEM into the preschool classroom. SRATE Journal, 23(2), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, S. (2014). 5 Reasons why fairy tales are good for children. Retrieved from: http://hcmslcunningham.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/1/5/13158368/5_reasons_why_fairy_tales_are_good_for_children.pdf

  • Donaldson, J. (2014). The maker movement and the rebirth of constructionism. Hybrid Pedagogy. http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/constructionism-reborn/

  • Dooley, C. M., & Matthews, M. W. (2009). Emergent comprehension: Understanding comprehension development among young literacy learners. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(3), 269–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A. H. (2008). Staying in the (curricular) lines: Practice constraints and possibilities in childhood writing. Written Communication, 25(1), 119–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early Childhood STEM Working Group. (2017). Early STEM Matters, Providing high-quality STEM experiences for all young learners: A policy report by the Early Childhood STEM Working Group. Erikson Institute. Retrieved from: http://d3lwefg3pyezlb.cloudfront.net/docs/Early_STEM_Matters_FINAL.pdf

  • Ejiwale, J. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of STEM education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteban-Guitart, M., & Moll, L. (2014). Lived experience, funds of identity and education. Culture & Psychology, 20(1), 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasso, W., & Knight, B. A. (2020). Identity development in school makerspaces: Intentional design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. M. (2018). Using children’s literature to teach mathematics: An effective vehicle in a STEM world. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3874.

  • Galliher, R. V., McLean, K. C., & Syed, M. (2017). An integrated developmental model for studying identity content in context. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2011–2022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, G., & Scharmann, L. (2008). Initial impacts of No Child Left Behind on elementary science education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hachey, A. C. (2009). I hate math: What we want young children NOT to learn. Texas Child Care Quarterly, Fall, 2009, 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachey, A. C. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs count: A study of teacher beliefs and practices in early childhood mathematics education (ECME). NHSA Dialog: A Research-to-Practice Journal for the Early Childhood Field, 16(3), 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachey, A. C. (2020). Success for all: Fostering early childhood STEM identity. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. New York: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, M. R. (2005). Becoming a student: Identity work and academic literacies in early schooling. TESOL Quarterly, 39(1), 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., & Garner, J. K. (2017). A complex dynamic systems perspective on identity and its development: The dynamic systems model of role identity. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2036–2051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A., Sinai, M., & Flum, H. (2014). Design-based interventions for promoting students identity formation within the school curriculum. In Motivational interventions (pp. 243–291). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. G. (2017). STEM in the early years. SEED: Collected paper from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) Conference. Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/beyond/seed/katz.html

  • Kellogg, R. (1973). Mis-understanding children’s art. Art Education, 26(6), 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 20(10), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.-J., & Hachey, A. C. (2020). Engaging preschoolers with critical literacy through counter-storytelling: A qualitative case study. Early Childhood Education Journal. Retrieved from: https://0-doi-org.lib.utep.edu/10.1007/s10643-020-01089-7

  • Langer-Osuna, J. M., & Nasir, N. S. (2016). Rehumanizing the “other” race, culture, and identity in education research. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 723–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design and desing thinking in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J., Kumpulainen, K., Nisha, B., Velicu, A., Blum-Ross, A., Hyatt, D., et al. (2017). Makerspaces in the early years: A literature review. University of Sheffield: MakEY Project. Retrieved from: http://makeyproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Makey_Literature_Review.pdf

  • Martin-Hanson, L. (2018). Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (2017). Engineering design process. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/best/edp.html

  • National Academies Press. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NMC. (2015). Horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. Retrieved from: https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2015/2/hr2015-pdf.pdf

  • Pantaleo, S. (2009). An ecological perspective on the socially embedded nature of reading and writing. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(1), 75–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantoya, M. E., Aguirre-Munoz, Z., & Hunt, E. M. (2015). Developing an engineering identity in early childhood. Journal of Engineering Education, 6(2), 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. (Eds.). (2016). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vols 1 and 2). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritle, J. M., & Maker, C. J. (2012). A qualitative analysis of kindergarteners’ open-ended drawing and storytelling opportunities. Retrieved from: https://www.ipisr.org.rs/images/arhiva-zbornika/44/Jody%20M.%20Pirtle%20and%20C.%20June%20Maker.pdf

  • Reveles, J. M., Cordova, R., & Kelly, G. J. (2004). Science literacy and Academic Identity formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1111–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A., Brown, P., & Bromley, L. (2012). Creepy carrots!. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, J., DeVane, B., Clegg, T., Peters, V. L., Songer, N., Goldman, S. R., et al (2012). Learning as identity formation: Implications for design, research and practice. Retrived from: https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/2252/1/126-133.pdf

  • Roffey, T., Sverko, C., & Therien, J. (2016). The making of a makerspace: Pedagogical and physical transformations of teaching and learning. Retrieved from: http://www.makerspaceforeducation.com/uploads/4/1/6/4/41640463/makerspace_for_education_curriculum_guide.pdf

  • Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual material. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saucerman, J., & Vasquez, K. (2014). Psychological barriers to STEM participation for women over the course of development. ADULTSPAN Journal, 13(1), 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N., Abramzon, N., Tibbetts, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). The longitudinal effects of STEM identity and gender on flourishing and achievement in college physics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharapan, H. (2012). From STEM to STEAM: How early childhood educators can apply Fred Rogers’ approach. Young Children, 67, 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipe, L. (2000). The construction of literary understanding by first and second graders in oral response to picture storybook read-alouds. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 252–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souto-Manning, M., & Yoon, H. S. (2018). Rethinking early literacies: Reading and rewriting worlds. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. (2011). Visual research methods in the social sciences: Awakening visions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • STEM Smart: Lessons Learned From Successful Schools. (2013, December). Nurturing stem skills in young learners, prek–3. Stem smart brief-early childhood learning, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: http://docplayer.net/7429009-Stem-smart-brief-stem-smart-lessons-learned-from-successful-schools.html

  • Talafian, H., Moy, M. K., Woodard, M. A., & Foster, A. N. (2019). STEM identity exploration through an immersive learning environment. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2, 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, Y. (2019). Kindergarten teachers’ attitudes toward and confidence for integrated STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2, 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Gaag, M. A. E., Albers, C. J., & Kunnen, E. S. (2017). Micro-level mechanisms of identity development: The role of emotional experiences in commitment development. Developmental Psychology, 53(11), 2205–2217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Teacher Education Department, University of Texas at El Paso UTEP, 500 W. University Way, EDUC 601D, El Paso, TX, USA

    Alyse C. Hachey, Song A. An & Diane E. Golding

Authors
  1. Alyse C. Hachey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Song A. An
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diane E. Golding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyse C. Hachey.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hachey, A.C., An, S.A. & Golding, D.E. Nurturing Kindergarteners’ Early STEM Academic Identity Through Makerspace Pedagogy. Early Childhood Educ J 50, 469–479 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01154-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01154-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation