Abstract
The objective of this research was to diagnose mathematical abilities in preschool children aged 5 to 7 on the basis of geometry and, subject to the results obtained, to recommend targeted pedagogical interventions with respect to the preschoolers found to have deficits in knowledge and skills. The research was conducted in the Biała Podlaska Laboratory of Psycho-Motor Skills in Poland in June 2018. A SensoMotoric Instrument eye-tracking device and the i ViewX platform registering data with a frame rate of 250 Hz was used. Using a special measurement system, the device can track and record the eye movements of an analysed person in a sequence and at a specific speed. The analysis of the data was performed with the application of the BeGaze 3.4 software. To demonstrate the differences between the correctness of task performance and the age and gender of the children, a Pearson’s Chi squared test was performed. To analyse the time that children from the study group needed to perform specific tasks, Student’s t test was employed. In all analysed cases, the significance level p = .05 was assumed. The results of the research involving the studied group of children (N = 176) demonstrated differences in the level of geometric skills. Regarding biological variables, such as gender and age, statistically significant differences were observed with respect to the age of the studied group. Distinguishing between plane shapes did not cause any problems in comparison with the tasks which required analytical thinking. The most evident distinctions were observed between children aged 5 and older children (6 and 7 years old). The level of difficulty of the tasks was a factor that affected the time needed to provide answers irrespective of gender. The level of geometric performance of the majority of the studied children was normal. Nonetheless, individual targeted interventions should be considered with respect to certain children with mathematical problems in order to improve their geometric skills before they start school education. The development of pedagogical interventions should be preceded by a targeted diagnosis of unsatisfactory performance and progress with respect to elementary mathematical skill acquisition. Teachers should be inspired to use innovative methods and techniques in their didactic practise in order to motivate children to study geometry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brendefur, J., Johnson, E. S., Thiede, K. W., Smith, E. V., Strother, S., Severson, H. H., & Beaulieu, J. (2015). Developing a comprehensive mathematical assessment tool to improve mathematics intervention for at-risk students. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 2(2), 65–90. Retrieved January 5, 2018, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1155707.
Brendefur, J. L., Johnson, E. S., Thiede, K. W., Strother, S., & Severson, H. H. (2018). Developing a multi-dimensional early elementary mathematics screener and diagnostic tool: The primary mathematics assessment. Early Childhood Education Journal,46(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0854-x.
Casa, M. T., Firmender, M. J., Gavin, K. M., Susan, R., & Carroll, R. S. (2017). Kindergarteners’ achievement on geometry and measurement units that incorporate a gifted education approach. Gifted Child Quarterly,61(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216671806.
Charlesworth, R., & Leali, A. S. (2012). Using problem solving to assess young children’s mathematics knowledge. Early Childhood Education Journal,39, 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-011-0480-y.
Chernoff, J. J., Flanagan, K. D., McPhee, C., & Park, J. (2007). Preschool: First findings from the third follow-up of the early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B). First Look. NCES 2008-025. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Costa, H. M., Nicholson, B., Donlan, C., & Van Herwegen, J. (2018). Low performance on mathematical tasks in preschoolers: The importance of domain-general and domain-specific Abilities. Disability Journal of Intellectual Research,62(4), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.12465.
Czajkowska, M. (2018). Różnice osiągnięć dziewcząt i chłopców w rozwiązywaniu zadań matematycznych [Differences in performance between girls and boys in mathematical task solving]. Teraźniejszość-Człowiek-Edukacja,21(81), 119–134.
Dobbs-Oates, J., & Robinson, Ch. (2012). Preschoolers’ mathematics skills and behavior: Analysis of a national sample. School Psychology Review,41(4), 371–386.
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology,43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.
Eurydice Report. (2019). Key data on early childhood education and care in Europe-2019 edition. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved April 15, 2019, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurydice.
Formoso, J., Injoque-Ricle, I., Barreyro, J.-P., Calero, A., Jacubovich, S., & Burín, D. I. (2018). Mathematical cognition, working memory,and processing speed in children. Cognition, Brain, Behavior. An Interdisciplinary Journal,23(2), 59–84.
Fridin, M. (2014). Kindergarten social assistive robot: First meeting and ethical issues. Computers in Human Behavior,30, 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.005.
Gardner, H. (2002). Inteligencje wielorakie. Teoria w praktyce [Manifold intelligence. Theory in practice]. Poznań: Wydawca Media-Rodzina.
Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with Mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences.
Ginsburg, H. P., Lee, J. S., & Boyd, J. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 22(1), 3–24. Retrieved April 10, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED521700.pdf.
Gruszczyk-Kolczyńska, E., & Zielińska, E. (2004). Wspomaganie rozwoju umysłowego czterolatków i pięciolatków [Supporting mental development of four- and five-year olds]. Warszawa: WSiP.
Hannula, M. M., Lepola, J., & Lehtinen, E. (2010). Spontaneous focusing on numerosity as a domain-specific predictor of arithmetical skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,107(4), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.004.
Huleihil, M., & Huleihil, H. (2011). Digital text based activity: Teaching geometrical entities at the kindergarten. In G. A. Tsihrintzis, L. C. Jain, M. Virvou, & R. Howlett (Eds.), Intelligent interactive multimedia systems and services: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services (IIMSS 2011) (pp. 99–112). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22158-311.
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology,45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939.
Keren, G., & Fridin, M. (2014). Kindergarten Social Assistive Robot (KindSAR) for children’s geometric thinking and metacognitive development in preschool education: A pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior,35, 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.009.
Kinzer, C., Gerhardt, K., & Coca, N. (2016). Building a case for blocks as kindergarten mathematics learning tools. Early Childhood Education Journal,44(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-015-0717-2.
Klim-Klimaszewska, A., & Nazaruk, S. (2017). The scope of implementation of geometric concepts in selected kindergartens in Poland. Problems of Education in the 21st Century,75(4), 345–353.
Lamanauskas, V. (2014). Science and math teachers’ collaboration: How to develop it seeking pupil’s success at school. Problems of Education in the 21st Century,62(62), 5–7.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities,42(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408331037.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Wu, Q. (2011). Kindergarten children’s growth trajectories in reading and mathematics: Who falls increasingly behind? Journal of Learning Disabilities,44(5), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411414010.
Nazaruk, S., & Marchel, J. (2016). Gotowość szkolna dzieci. Wyniki badań z wybranych przedszkoli z terenu Białej Podlaskiej [Children’s school readiness. Results of research in selected preschools across Biała Podlaska]. Biała Podlaska: Wydawnictwo Państwowej Szkoły Wyższej im. Papieża Jana Pawła II.
PISA. (2012). Wyniki badania 2012 w Polsce [Poland 2012 assessment results]. Retrieved January 12, 2018, from http://www.ibe.edu.pl/images/prasa/PISA-2012-raport_krajowy.pdf.
PISA. (2015). Results Excellence and equity in education. Volume I, OECD 2016. Retrieved January 12, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2015-results-volume-i-9789264266490-en.htm.
Pregler, A., & Wiatrak, E. (Eds.). (2011). Ogólnopolskie badanie umiejętności trzecioklasistów. Raport z badań OBUT 2011 [All-Poland Assessment of Third-Grader Mathematics Performance]. Warszawa: Centralna Komisja Egzaminacyjna. Retrieved January 12, 2018, from http://www.obut.edu.pl/artykuly/files/135/raport_ogolnopolski_2011_0.pdf.
Rozporządzenie Ministra Edukacji Narodowej z dnia 14 lutego 2017 r. w sprawie podstawy programowej wychowania przedszkolnego oraz podstawy programowej kształcenia ogólnego dla szkoły podstawowej, Dz. U. z dnia 24 lutego 2017, poz. 356. [Regulation of the Minister of National Education of 24th February 2017 on the core curriculum for preschool education and general education in individual types of schools, J. L. 2017, item 356].
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2004). Building Blocks for early childhood mathematics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly,19(1), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.014.
Sikder, S., & Fleer, M. (2016). Incremental science learning in toddler’s play. International Journal of Science Education, Part B,6(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1020457.
Simanowski, S., & Krajewski, K. (2019). Specific preschool executive functions predict unique aspects of mathematics development: A 3-year longitudinal study. Child Development,90(2), 544–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12909.
Vainio, K. L., & Raus, R. (2014). Using selected personality variables in a learning process for holistic education: A case of a voice training course participants. Problems of Education in the 21st Century,60(60), 167–184.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Elia, I., & Robitzsch, A. (2016). Effects of reading picture books on kindergartners’ mathematics performance. Educational Psychology,36(2), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.963029.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nazaruk, S. Diagnosis of the Mathematical Skills of Children from Polish Kindergartens and Its Importance for Geometric Shape Recognition. Early Childhood Educ J 48, 463–472 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01005-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-01005-8