Abstract
Young children need to develop creative problem-solving skills to ensure success in an uncertain future workplace. Although most teachers recognize the importance of creativity, they do not always know how integrate it with content learning. This repeated measures study on animal and plant lifecycles examined student learning of vocabulary and enjoyment of schoolwork under two conditions: a control condition of drawing and labeling the parts of the lifecycle and the experimental condition of transforming simple figures into drawings of lifecycle elements (figural transformations). Twenty-two second-grade students (15 females, 7 males) alternated between the two conditions for four different 1-week lifecycle lessons featuring these organisms: dragonfly, sea turtle, horse, and bean plant. Results showed that students learned more vocabulary with a medium effect size in the experimental condition. Students also perceived the experimental condition as more conducive to learning. Both conditions were considered by students to be nearly equally enjoyable, although they at first resisted the more challenging creative tasks. Future research might explore the effects of ongoing, longer-term exposure to integration of creative skills with content learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 108–119.
Goldberg, M. (2008). Solitary confinement in education. Arts Education Policy Review, 110(2), 29–31.
Greenleaf, R. K. (2005). Brain based teaching: Making connections for long-term memory and recall. Newfield, ME: Greenleaf Papanek Publications.
Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., Marsh, J. A., McCombs, J. S., Robyn, A., Russell, J. L., et al. (2007). Standards-based accountability under no child left behind: Experiences of teachers and administrators in three states. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Huitt, W. (2007). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved [date] from, http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/regsys/maslow.html.
Lin, Y.-S. (2009). Teacher and pupil responses to a creative pedagogy—Case studies of two primary classes in Taiwan. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Exeter: University of Exeter.
Lin, Y.-S. (2011). Fostering creativity through education—A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 2(3), 149–155.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. Sudbury, Suffolk: Department for Education and Employment.
Rowlands, S. (2011). Discussion article: Disciplinary boundaries for creativity. Creative Education, 2(1), 47–55.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). Twenty-first Century skills: Learning for life in our times, volume 1. partnership for twenty-first century skills. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 285–325.
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Webb, A.N., Rule, A.C. Developing Second Graders’ Creativity Through Literacy-Science Integrated Lessons on Lifecycles. Early Childhood Educ J 40, 379–385 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0532-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0532-y