Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Survival and movement patterns of central California coast native steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Napa River

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on acoustic telemetry this study identifies and describes local and regional scale survival and movement patterns of Central California Coast steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss), including their potential utilization of newly restored tidal marsh habitats in the Napa River system. Between April 8th and May 5th of 2010, 20 steelhead smolts ranging in fork length from 164 to 305 mm were collected, tagged with acoustic transmitters, and released in the upper Napa River (above tidal influence). We found no effect of release date (P < 0.001) or size (P < 0.005) on survival estimates based on model likelihoods. Cumulative survival from smolt release location to the Golden Gate Bridge over approximately 77 river kilometers (RKM) was 0.60 (SE = 0.16). Reach-specific survival was lowest in the initial 30 km reach (0.70 SE = 0.1). Survival was higher in San Pablo Bay (0.89 SE = 0.1) and San Francisco Bay (0.96 SE = 0.2). Sixty percent of the fish that entered the ocean were detected on a line of acoustic monitors at Point Reyes approximately 60 km north of the Golden Gate. Average movement rates of smolts were highest in San Pablo Bay (36.6 km∙d-1 SE = 3.3) and San Francisco Bay (28.9 km∙d-1 SE = 6.6). Smolts migrated more slowly in the river (9.0 km∙d-1 SE = 0.9) and ocean (4.1 km∙d-1 SE = 1.2). However, smolt movement rates in the river were dependent on location. Average movement rates of smolts were greatest shortly before their exit from the Napa River (83 km∙d-1 SE = 13.2). Fish were not detected within the recently reconnected former salt production ponds (North, Central, and South units) adjacent to the Napa River. Based on the detection patterns of fish throughout the study area, it appears that most fish were moving at relatively high rates and were not exploring off-channel habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson KR (1969) Steelhead Resource, Napa River Drainage, Napa County. Report dated December 23

  • Bond MH, Hayes SA, Hanson CV, MacFarlane RB (2008) Marine survival of steelhead(Oncorhynchus mykiss) enhanced by a seasonally closed estuary. Can J Fish Aq Sci 65:2242–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, SR, Coggins LG, Swanton CO (1998) A simple stratified design for mark-recapture estimation of salmon smolt abundance. Alaska Fish Res Bull 5:88–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormack RM (1964) Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika 51:429–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen L, Shwarz C (2005) Capture-Recapture studies using radio telemetry with premature radio-tag failure. Biometrics 61:657–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Real SC, Workman M, Merz J (2011) Migration characteristics of hatchery and natural-origin Oncorhynchus mykiss from the lower Mokelumne River, CA. Environ Biol Fish. doi:10.1007/s10641-011-9967-z

  • Harding JA, Ammann AJ, MacFarlane RB (2011) Regional and seasonal patterns of epipelagic fish assemblages from the central California Current. Fish Bull 109(3):261–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausch SJ, Melnychuk MC (2011) Residualization of hatchery steelhead: a meta-analysis of hatchery practices. No Am J Fish Man

  • Hayes SA, Bond MH, Hanson CV, Jones AW, Ammann AJ, Harding JA, Collins AL, Perez J, MacFarlane RB (2011) Down, up, down and “smolting” twice? Seasonal movement patterns by juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in a coastal watershed with a bar closing estuary. Can J Fish Aq Sci 68:1341–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly GM (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler J (2009) Napa River steelhead and salmon smolt monitoring program: Annual Report—year 1 (1–39). Napa County Resource Conser Dist

  • Koehler J, Blank P (2010) Napa River steelhead and salmon smolt monitoring program: annual report—year 2 (1–39). Napa County Resource Conser Dist

  • LaCroix GL, Knox D, McCurdy P (2004) Effects of implanted dummy acoustic transmitters on juvenile Atlantic salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 133(1):211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidy RA, Becker GS, Harvey BN (2005) Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA

  • Lindley ST, Schick RS, Mora E, Adams PB, Anderson JJ, Greene S, Hanson C, May BP, McEwan DR, MacFarlane RB, Swanson C, Williams JG (2007) Framework for assessing viability of threatened and endanger Chinook salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Basin. SF Est Watershed Sci 5:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas MC (1989) Effects of implanted dummy transmitters on mortality, growth, and tissue reaction in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. J Fish Bio 35:577–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane (2010) Energy dynamics and growth of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the Central Valley of California during the estuarine phase and first ocean year. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:1549–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane RB, Ralston SR, Royer C, Norton EC (2005) Juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) growth on the central California coast during the 1998 El Niño and 1999 La Niña. Fish Oceangr 14:321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Satterthwaite WH (2008) Combining proximate and ultimate approaches to understand life history variation in salmonids with application to fisheries, conservation, and aquaculture. Bull Mar Sci 83:107–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti MP, Moyle PB (2001) Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream. Ecol Soc Am 11(2):530–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti MP, Light T, Moyle PB, Viers JH (2004) Fish invasions in California watersheds: testing hypotheses using landscape patterns. Ecol Apps 14(5):1507–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhany P, Ruckelshaus MH, Ford MJ, Wainwright TC, Bjorkstedt EP (2000) Viable salmonid populations and the conservation of evolutionary significant units. US Dept Commer NOAA Tech Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-42 Seattle, WA

  • Melnychuk MC, Hausch (2011) Method for estimating detection probabilities of non-migrant tagged fish: applications for quantifying salmon residualization rates. Trans Am Fish Soc

  • Melnychuk MC, Welch DW, Walters CJ (2010) Spatio-temporal migration patterns of Pacific salmon smolts in rivers and coastal marine waters. PLoS ONE 5(9):e12916. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ME, Berejikian BA, Tezak EP (2010) Early marine survival and behavior of steelhead smolts through Hood Canal and the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehlsen W, Williams JE, Lichatowich JA (1991) Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16(2):4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry RW, Skalski JR, Brandes PL, Sandstrom PT, Klimley AP, Ammann A, MacFarlane RB (2010) Estimating survival and migration route probabilities of juvenile Chinook salmon in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. N Am J Fish Manag 30:142–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom PT, Ammann AJ, Michel C, Singer G, Chapman ED, Lindley S, MacFarlane RB, Klimley AP (2012) Growth, survival, and tag retention of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and its application to survival estimates. Environ Biol Fish. doi:10.1007/s10641-012-0051-0

  • Satterthwaite WH, Beakes MP, Collins EM, Swank DR, Merz JE, Titus RG, Sogard SM, Mangel M (2009) Steelhead life history on California’s central coast: insights from a state-dependent model. Trans Am Fish Soc 138:532–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1965) A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52:249–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapovalov L, Taft A (1954) The life histories of the steelhead rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri gairdneri) and silver salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) with special reference to Waddell Creek, California, and recommendations regarding their management. CA DFG Fish Bull 98:1–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipping JM, Cooper RV, Byrne JB, Johnson TH (1995) Length and condition factor of migrating and nonmigrating hatchery-reared winter steelhead smolts. Prog Fish-Cult 57:120–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USACE (2007) Juvenile Salmonid outmigration and distribution study design for the San Francisco estuary. US Army Corps of Engineers, San Francisco District

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward BR, Slaney PA, Facchin AR, Land RW (1989) Size-biased survival in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): back-calculated lengths from adults’ scales compared to migrating smolts at the Keogh River, British Columbia. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 46:1853–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch DW, Batten SW, Ward BR (2007) Growth, survival, and tag retention of steelhead trout (O. mykiss) surgically implanted with dummy acoustic tags. Hydrobiologia 582:289–299

    Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 (Suppl.) 120–139 Version 5.1

  • Wilkinson C (1999) Fish and wildlife coordination act report for the Napa River flood damage reduction project. USFWS for USACE, Report dated April. In: RA Leidy, GS Becker, BN Harvey (eds) 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA

  • Winter JD (1983) Underwater biotelemetry. In: Nielson L & Johnson DL eds Fisheries Techniques. Bethesda, MD: Am Fish Soc pp 371–395

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Restoration Center (Southwest Region staff) and Ducks Unlimited. Funding to complete this research was provided by NOAA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act through a grant to Ducks Unlimited. We also thank the California Department of Game for allowing us to deploy receivers in the restored tidal marsh habitats (North, Central, and South units). We thank the California Fish Tracking Consortium for maintaining both the receiver array and centralized database which made possible detections at locations outside of the Napa River. We thank the Biotelemetry Laboratory at UC Davis for supplies and technical support. We also thank Jonathan Koehler and the Napa County Resource Conservation District for operating the rotary screw trap, which enabled us to tag the juvenile steelhead. POST and NOAA Santa Cruz for supporting the Pt Reyes line of receivers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. T. Sandstrom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandstrom, P.T., Keegan, T. & Singer, G. Survival and movement patterns of central California coast native steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Napa River. Environ Biol Fish 96, 287–302 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-012-0092-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-012-0092-4

Keywords

Navigation