Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CO2 Emissions and Income Dynamics: What Does the Global Evidence Tell Us?

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the co-evolution of two major determinants of social welfare, namely, income and carbon emissions. In particular, by using a distribution dynamics approach based on Markov chains, we investigate the shape and behavior of the joint distribution of per-capita income and carbon dioxide emissions. We arrive at several interesting conclusions, especially in the context of international negotiations on climate change. First, evidence does not support theoretical models predicting the existence of a poverty-environment trap. Specifically, in the long-run two main groups of countries will emerge: poor versus polluting countries. Second, the typical development path leads initially to high emission levels and, subsequently, to high income. Third, the convergence process towards the stationary distribution is very slow. Finally, for carbon emissions, whenever it is observed, the environmental Kuznets curve seems to be only a transitory phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acaravci A, Ozturk I (2010) On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy 35: 5412–5420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldy JE (2006) Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: convergence or divergence?. Environ Resour Econ 33(4): 533–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TW, Goodman LA (1957) Statistical inference about Markov chains. Ann Math Stat 28(1): 89–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R et al (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268: 520–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azomahou T, Laisney F, Van Nguyen P (2006) Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. J Public Econ 90(6–7): 1347–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barassi MR, Cole MA, Elliot RJR (2008) Stochastic divergence or convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions: re-examining the evidence. Environ Resour Econ 40(1): 121–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew DJ (1982) Stochastic Models for Social Processes. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertinelli L, Strobl E (2005) The environmental Kuznets curve semi-parametrically revisited. Econ Lett 88(3): 350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA et al (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi BH (ed) Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, JAI, vol 15, pp 161–178

  • Brock WA, Taylor MS (2010) The green Solow model. J Econ Growth 15(2): 127–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulli S (2001) Distribution dynamics and cross-country convergence: a new approach. Scott J Polit Econ 48(2): 226–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth and the environment. J Econ Lit 42: 7–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessandro S, Luzzati T, Morroni M (2010) Energy transition towards economic and environmental sustainability: feasible paths and policy implications. J Clean Prod 18: 291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H et al (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16: 147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudek D, Golub A, Strukova E (2003) Ancillary benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in transitional economies. World Dev 31(10): 1759–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esty DC, Levy MA, Kim CH et al (2008) Environmental performance index. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiaschi D, Lavezzi AM (2003) Distribution dynamics and nonlinear growth. J Econ Growth 8: 379–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiaschi D, Lavezzi AM (2005) An empirical analysis of growth volatility: a Markov chain approach. In: Leskow J, Puchet M, Punzo LF (eds) New tools of economic dynamics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiaschi D, Lavezzi AM (2007) Nonlinear economic growth: some theory and cross-country evidence. J Dev Econ 84: 271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg A (2011) Pro-equity effects of ancillary benefits of climate change policies: a case study of human health impacts of outdoor air pollution in New Delhi. World Dev 39(6): 1002–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network (2011) Ecological footprint. http://www.footprintnetwork.org. Cited 1 March 2011

  • Halsnæs K, Garg A (2011) Assessing the role of energy in development and climate policies—conceptual approach and key indicators. World Dev 39(6): 987–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2009) Penn world table version 6.3 Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP)

  • Hettige H, Mani M, Wheeler D (2000) Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. J Dev Econ 62(2): 445–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikefuji M, Horii R (2007) Wealth heterogeneity and escape from the poverty–environment trap. J Public Econ Theory 9(6): 1041–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogenous panels. J Econ 115(1): 53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2011) Prospect of limiting the global increase in temperature to 2°C is getting bleaker. http://www.iea.org/index_info.asp?id=1959. Cited 6 June 2011

  • Isaacson DL, Madsen WR (1976) Markov chains–theory and applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson MZ (2008) On the causal link between carbon dioxide and air pollution mortality. Geophys Res Lett 35(L03809): 5

    Google Scholar 

  • John A, Pecchenino R (1994) An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment. Econ J 104: 1393–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PA (2005) A continuous state space approach to convergence by parts. Econ Lett 86: 317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gallo J (2004) Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: a Markov chains approach. Int Reg Sci Rev 27(2): 138–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1): 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Bazo E, Vaya E, Mora JM et al (1999) Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Ann Reg Sci 33: 343–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61: 631–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäler KG, Xepapadeas A, de Zeeuw A (2003) The economics of shallow lakes. Environ Resour Econ 26: 603–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariani F, Perez-Barahona A, Raffin N (2010) Life expectancy and the environment. J Econ Dyn Control 34(4): 798–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naimzada A, Sodini M (2010) Multiple attractors and nonlinear dynamics in an overlapping generations model with environment. Discret Dyn Nat Soc. doi:10.1155/2010/503695

  • Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38(1): 661–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neven D, Gouyette C (1995) Regional convergence in the European Community. J Common Mark Stud 33: 47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Van P (2005) Distribution dynamics of CO2 emissions. Environ Resour Econ 32: 495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris JR (1997) Markov chains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordás Criado C, Grether JM (2011) Convergence in per capita CO2 emissions: a robust distributional approach. Resour Energy Econ 33(3): 637–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ordás Criado C, Valente S, Stengos T (2011) Growth and pollution convergence: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 62(2): 199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill DW (2011) Measuring progress towards a steady state economy. In: 2nd conference on economic degrowth for ecological sustainability and social equity, 26–29 March, Barcelona

  • Pedroni P (1995) Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Indiana University working papers in economics 95–013, June

  • Pedroni P (1997) Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Indiana University working papers in economics, April

  • Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61: 653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah D (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37: 426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Avila D (2008) Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions among industrialized countries revisited. Energy Econ 30(5): 2265–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of the Union (2010) Speech of the president of the USA. 27 Jan 2010

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32: 1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strazicich M, List JA (2003) Are CO2 emissions levels converging among industrial countries?. Environ Resour Econ 24: 263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart A, Ord K (1994) Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics. vol 1, 6th edn. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and the energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25: 195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997) Kyoto protocol. http://www.unfccc.int. Cited 26 Nov 2010

  • Vande Kerk G, Manuel AR (2008) A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: the SSI—the Sustainable Society Index. Ecol Econ 66: 228–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varvarigos D (2010) Environmental degradation, longevity, and the dynamics of economic development. Environ Resour Econ 46: 59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund J, Basher SA (2008) Testing for convergence in carbon dioxide emissions using a century of panel data. Environ Resour Econ 40(1): 109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2010) World Development Indicators report. Washington

  • World Bank (2011) World Development Indicators and report. Washington

  • Xepapadeas A (1997) Economic development and environmental pollution: traps and growth. Struct Change Econ Dyn 8: 327–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Bassetti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassetti, T., Benos, N. & Karagiannis, S. CO2 Emissions and Income Dynamics: What Does the Global Evidence Tell Us?. Environ Resource Econ 54, 101–125 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9583-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9583-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation