Abstract
This paper analyzes the co-evolution of two major determinants of social welfare, namely, income and carbon emissions. In particular, by using a distribution dynamics approach based on Markov chains, we investigate the shape and behavior of the joint distribution of per-capita income and carbon dioxide emissions. We arrive at several interesting conclusions, especially in the context of international negotiations on climate change. First, evidence does not support theoretical models predicting the existence of a poverty-environment trap. Specifically, in the long-run two main groups of countries will emerge: poor versus polluting countries. Second, the typical development path leads initially to high emission levels and, subsequently, to high income. Third, the convergence process towards the stationary distribution is very slow. Finally, for carbon emissions, whenever it is observed, the environmental Kuznets curve seems to be only a transitory phenomenon.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acaravci A, Ozturk I (2010) On the relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Europe. Energy 35: 5412–5420
Aldy JE (2006) Per capita carbon dioxide emissions: convergence or divergence?. Environ Resour Econ 33(4): 533–555
Anderson TW, Goodman LA (1957) Statistical inference about Markov chains. Ann Math Stat 28(1): 89–110
Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R et al (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268: 520–521
Azomahou T, Laisney F, Van Nguyen P (2006) Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. J Public Econ 90(6–7): 1347–1363
Barassi MR, Cole MA, Elliot RJR (2008) Stochastic divergence or convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions: re-examining the evidence. Environ Resour Econ 40(1): 121–137
Bartholomew DJ (1982) Stochastic Models for Social Processes. Wiley, New York
Bertinelli L, Strobl E (2005) The environmental Kuznets curve semi-parametrically revisited. Econ Lett 88(3): 350–357
Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis. Clarendon, Oxford
Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA et al (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman and Hall, New York
Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi BH (ed) Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, JAI, vol 15, pp 161–178
Brock WA, Taylor MS (2010) The green Solow model. J Econ Growth 15(2): 127–153
Bulli S (2001) Distribution dynamics and cross-country convergence: a new approach. Scott J Polit Econ 48(2): 226–243
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth and the environment. J Econ Lit 42: 7–71
D’Alessandro S, Luzzati T, Morroni M (2010) Energy transition towards economic and environmental sustainability: feasible paths and policy implications. J Clean Prod 18: 291–298
Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H et al (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16: 147–168
Dudek D, Golub A, Strukova E (2003) Ancillary benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in transitional economies. World Dev 31(10): 1759–1769
Esty DC, Levy MA, Kim CH et al (2008) Environmental performance index. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, New Haven
Fiaschi D, Lavezzi AM (2003) Distribution dynamics and nonlinear growth. J Econ Growth 8: 379–401
Fiaschi D, Lavezzi AM (2005) An empirical analysis of growth volatility: a Markov chain approach. In: Leskow J, Puchet M, Punzo LF (eds) New tools of economic dynamics. Springer, Berlin
Fiaschi D, Lavezzi AM (2007) Nonlinear economic growth: some theory and cross-country evidence. J Dev Econ 84: 271–290
Garg A (2011) Pro-equity effects of ancillary benefits of climate change policies: a case study of human health impacts of outdoor air pollution in New Delhi. World Dev 39(6): 1002–1025
Global Footprint Network (2011) Ecological footprint. http://www.footprintnetwork.org. Cited 1 March 2011
Halsnæs K, Garg A (2011) Assessing the role of energy in development and climate policies—conceptual approach and key indicators. World Dev 39(6): 987–1001
Heston A, Summers R, Aten B (2009) Penn world table version 6.3 Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP)
Hettige H, Mani M, Wheeler D (2000) Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. J Dev Econ 62(2): 445–476
Ikefuji M, Horii R (2007) Wealth heterogeneity and escape from the poverty–environment trap. J Public Econ Theory 9(6): 1041–1068
Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogenous panels. J Econ 115(1): 53–74
International Energy Agency (2011) Prospect of limiting the global increase in temperature to 2°C is getting bleaker. http://www.iea.org/index_info.asp?id=1959. Cited 6 June 2011
Isaacson DL, Madsen WR (1976) Markov chains–theory and applications. Wiley, New York
Jacobson MZ (2008) On the causal link between carbon dioxide and air pollution mortality. Geophys Res Lett 35(L03809): 5
John A, Pecchenino R (1994) An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment. Econ J 104: 1393–1410
Johnson PA (2005) A continuous state space approach to convergence by parts. Econ Lett 86: 317–321
Le Gallo J (2004) Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: a Markov chains approach. Int Reg Sci Rev 27(2): 138–163
Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CSJ (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Econ 108(1): 1–24
Lopez-Bazo E, Vaya E, Mora JM et al (1999) Regional economic dynamics and convergence in the European Union. Ann Reg Sci 33: 343–370
Maddala GS, Wu S (1999) A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61: 631–652
Mäler KG, Xepapadeas A, de Zeeuw A (2003) The economics of shallow lakes. Environ Resour Econ 26: 603–624
Mariani F, Perez-Barahona A, Raffin N (2010) Life expectancy and the environment. J Econ Dyn Control 34(4): 798–815
Naimzada A, Sodini M (2010) Multiple attractors and nonlinear dynamics in an overlapping generations model with environment. Discret Dyn Nat Soc. doi:10.1155/2010/503695
Narayan PK, Narayan S (2010) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy 38(1): 661–666
Neven D, Gouyette C (1995) Regional convergence in the European Community. J Common Mark Stud 33: 47–65
Nguyen-Van P (2005) Distribution dynamics of CO2 emissions. Environ Resour Econ 32: 495–508
Norris JR (1997) Markov chains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ordás Criado C, Grether JM (2011) Convergence in per capita CO2 emissions: a robust distributional approach. Resour Energy Econ 33(3): 637–665
Ordás Criado C, Valente S, Stengos T (2011) Growth and pollution convergence: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 62(2): 199–214
O’Neill DW (2011) Measuring progress towards a steady state economy. In: 2nd conference on economic degrowth for ecological sustainability and social equity, 26–29 March, Barcelona
Pedroni P (1995) Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Indiana University working papers in economics 95–013, June
Pedroni P (1997) Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Indiana University working papers in economics, April
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61: 653–670
Quah D (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. Eur Econ Rev 37: 426–434
Romero-Avila D (2008) Convergence in carbon dioxide emissions among industrialized countries revisited. Energy Econ 30(5): 2265–2282
State of the Union (2010) Speech of the president of the USA. 27 Jan 2010
Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32: 1419–1439
Strazicich M, List JA (2003) Are CO2 emissions levels converging among industrial countries?. Environ Resour Econ 24: 263–271
Stuart A, Ord K (1994) Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics. vol 1, 6th edn. Edward Arnold, London
Suri V, Chapman D (1998) Economic growth, trade and the energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25: 195–208
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1997) Kyoto protocol. http://www.unfccc.int. Cited 26 Nov 2010
Vande Kerk G, Manuel AR (2008) A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: the SSI—the Sustainable Society Index. Ecol Econ 66: 228–242
Varvarigos D (2010) Environmental degradation, longevity, and the dynamics of economic development. Environ Resour Econ 46: 59–73
Westerlund J, Basher SA (2008) Testing for convergence in carbon dioxide emissions using a century of panel data. Environ Resour Econ 40(1): 109–120
World Bank (2010) World Development Indicators report. Washington
World Bank (2011) World Development Indicators and report. Washington
Xepapadeas A (1997) Economic development and environmental pollution: traps and growth. Struct Change Econ Dyn 8: 327–350
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bassetti, T., Benos, N. & Karagiannis, S. CO2 Emissions and Income Dynamics: What Does the Global Evidence Tell Us?. Environ Resource Econ 54, 101–125 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9583-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9583-1