Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A path model of contextual factors influencing science teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-phase exploratory sequential mixed-method study was conducted to propose and test a model showing the interrelationships among the contextual factors influencing the science teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Though developing teachers’ TPACK is critical for technology integration in education, the contextual factors influencing TPACK were mostly neglected and this study aimed to fill this gap in the literature. The first phase of the study was aimed to determine the contextual factors by interviewing science teachers and educational technology experts. The findings revealed nine common factors involving student influence, teachers’ beliefs and attitudes, technological infrastructure, administrative support, technical support, colleague interaction, lack of time, professional development, educational technology experience. In the second phase, a path model was hypothesized based on qualitative study results and related literature. In the third phase, a valid and reliable scale, named Contextual Factors Scale was developed to measure these contextual factors. Then, a questionnaire involving this scale and TPACK was administrated to 348 science teachers. Showing complex interrelationships among contextual factors, the model explained 45% of the variance in science teachers’ TPACK, with particular importance placed on professional development, teachers’ beliefs and attitudes, administrative support, and student influence. Looking from a holistic perspective, this study provided a valuable model for guiding decision-makers, researchers, and practitioners about how to improve teachers’ TPACK and technology integration in the schools. Considering the complex interrelationships in the model, some simultaneous strategies dealing with each factor should be applied to improve teachers’ TPACK and technology-related practices in the schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksu, G., Eser, M.T., & Güzeller, C.O. (2017). Açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.

  • Albayrak Sarı, A., Canbazoğlu Bilici, S., Baran, E., & Özbay, U. (2016). Investigatingthe relationship between teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) competencies and attitudes towards information and communication technologies. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 6(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekhlafi, A. G., & Almeqdadi, F. A. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in the United Arab Emirates school classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 165–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alt, D. (2018). Science teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S.L. (2000). School technology leadership: Incidence and impact (No: 6). Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey report. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations University of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota.

  • Arslan, S., & Şendurur, P. (2017). Investigation of changes in factors affecting the technology integration in education. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty. (43), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.21927

  • Ay, Y., Karadağ, E., & Acat, M. B. (2015). The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-practical (TPACK-Practical) model: Examination of its validity in the Turkish culture via structural equation modeling. Computers & Education, 88, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! Computers & Education, 166, 104159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakir, R. (2012). Technology integration and technology leadership in schools as learning organizations. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4), 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (2019). Exploring the impact of teacher emotions on their approaches to teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S.-L., & Xie, K. (2018). The relations among teacher value beliefs, personal characteristics, and TPACK in intervention and non-intervention settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (2009). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Edition). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an Elaborated Model of the TPACK Framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd Edition). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davaasuren, B., So, H. J., & Ryoo, D. (2021). Exploring the relationship between school support and technology use among Mongolian teachers: The mediating role of TPACK. Educational Technology International, 22(1), 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, R.F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd Edition). Sage Publications.

  • Dong, Y., Xu, C., Chai, C. S., & Zhai, X. (2020). Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drennan, J. (2003). Cognitive interviewing: Verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02579.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. T., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Kreijns, K. (2016). Organisational and task factors influencing teachers’ professional development at work. European Journal of Training and Development, 40(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03-2015-0023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A.P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex, drugs and rock “n” roll (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications.

  • Forssell, K.S. (2011). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Relationships to learning ecologies and social learning networks (Doctoral thesis). Stanford University.

  • Glazer, E., Hannafin, M. J., & Song, L. (2005). Promoting technology integration through collaborative apprenticeship. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. D., & Jones, W. M. (2020). Analyzing contextual levels and applications of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in English as a second language subject area: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(4), 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.B., Phillips, M., Koehler, M.J., & Rosenberg, J.M. (2017). TPCK/TPACK research and development: Past, present, and future directions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), i-viii. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3907

  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J. E., & Uribe-Florez, L. (2020). Understanding secondary school teachers’ TPACK and technology implementation in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Technology in Education, 3(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K., & Thompson, K. (2016). Seeing the system: Dynamics and complexity of technology integration in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1877–1894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9424-2

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F. A., & ve Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Society for Technology in Education. (2020). ISTE Standards. https://www.iste.org/standards Accessed 27 Apr 2020.

  • John, P. D., & La Velle, L. B. (2004). Devices and desires: Subject subcultures, pedagogical identity and the challenge of information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafyulilo, A. C., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2015). Supporting teachers learning through the collaborative design of technology-enhanced science lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(8), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9444-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1535–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9398-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaca, F., Can, G., & Yildirim, S. (2013). A path model for technology integration into elementary school settings in Turkey. Computers & Education, 68, 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.017

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L. (2019). TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers & Education, 70, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., & Tay, L. Y. (2014). TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers’ construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 78, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louws, M. L., van Veen, K., Meirink, J. A., & van Driel, J. H. (2017). Teachers’ professional learning goals in relation to teaching experience. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1342241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPheron, P. M. (2019). The relationship between administrative leadership and the professional learning environment: A quantitative correlation study (Doctoral thesiss). Northcentral University.

  • Ministry of Education. (2020). FATİH Projesi. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/ Accessed 10 July 2020.

  • Mishra, P., & Warr, M. (2021). Contextualizing TPACK within systems and cultures of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Kin, T., Abdull Kareem, O., Nordin, M. S., & Wai Bing, K. (2018). Principal change leadership competencies and teacher attitudes toward change: The mediating effects of teacher change beliefs. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(4), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2016.1272719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Edition). Sage Publications.

  • Miranda, H., & Russell, M. (2011). Predictors of teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK diagram gets an upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. J., Voithofer, R., & Cheng, S.-L. (2019). Mediating factors that influence the technology integration practices of teacher educators. Computers & Education, 128, 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olofson, M. W., Swallow, M. J. C., & Neumann, M. D. (2016). TPACKing: A constructivist framing of TPACK to analyze teachers’ construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 95, 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquette, J. (2021). TPACK factors: A mixed method research study comparing generational use of technology in the classroom (Doctoral dissertation). Northcentral University.

  • Park, S., Steve Oliver, J., Star Johnson, T., Graham, P., & Oppong, N. K. (2007). Colleagues’ roles in the professional development of teachers: Results from a research study of National Board certification. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 368–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications.

  • Porras-Hernández, L. H., & Salinas-Amescua, B. (2013). Strengthening TPACK: A broader notion of context and the use of teacher’s narratives to reveal knowledge construction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schad, E. (2019). No time to talk! Teachers’ perceptions of organizational communication: Context and climate. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217739358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Seçer, İ. (2015). Psikolojik test geliştirme ve uyarlama süreci SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Anı Yayıncılık.

  • Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre- and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552

  • Sprott, R. A. (2019). Factors that foster and deter advanced teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th Edition.). Routledge.

  • Şimşek, Ö., & Yazar, T. (2018). Analyzing technology integration self-efficacy of prospective teachers: The case of Turkey. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 17(66), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.357330

  • Tai, S.-J.D. (2013). From TPACK-in-Action workshops to English classrooms: CALL competencies developed and adopted into classroom teaching (Doctoral thesis). Iowa State University.

  • Tennant, A. E. C. (2019). Using teachers’ experience with technology to understand their learning and teaching styles (Doctoral thesis). Concordia University–Portland.

  • Thannimalai, R., Raman, A., & Ismail, S.N. (2018). The influence of principals’ technology leadership and professional development on teachers’ technology integration in secondary schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.8

  • Thomas, L., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2019). Beginning teachers’ professional support: A mixed methods social network study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 83, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, J.-J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslu, O. (2018). Factors associated with technology integration to improve instructional abilities: A path model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n4.3

  • Vanderlinde, R., Aesaert, K., & ve van Braak, J. (2014). Institutionalised ICT use in primary education: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 72, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voithofer, R., Nelson, M. J., Han, G., & Caines, A. (2019). Factors that influence TPACK adoption by teacher educators in the US. Educational Technology Research and Development., 67, 1427–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09652-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge—A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. D. (2017). Philosophy of technology assumptions in educational technology leadership. Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 25–36.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2008). Leading schools in the digital age: A clash of cultures. School Leadership & Management, 28(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802145779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K., & Chien, S.-P. (2017). Exploring the structure of TPACK with video-embedded and discipline-focused assessments. Computers & Education, 104, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K., Hwang, F.-K., & Lin, T.-C. (2014). Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique: Development and validation of TPACK-practical. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 707–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y.-F., Lin, T.-C., Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K., & Hwang, F.-K. (2015). Science teachers’ proficiency levels and patterns of TPACK in a practical context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9523-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y.-F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & Education, 171, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238

  • Yerdelen-Damar, S., Boz, Y., & Aydın-Günbatar, S. (2017). Mediated effects of technology competencies and experiences on relations among attitudes towards technology use, technology ownership, and self efficacy about Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9687-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Liu, Q., & Wang, Q. (2017). A study of peer coaching in teachers’ online professional learning communities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(2), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0461-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, D., Huang, X., & Kohnke, L. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the trends and research topics of empirical research on TPACK. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10991-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is derived from the first author's PhD dissertation under the supervision of the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Distance Education Application and Research Center, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey

    Taibe Kulaksız

  2. Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology, Atatürk Faculty of Education, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Feride Karaca

Authors
  1. Taibe Kulaksız
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feride Karaca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data collection and analysis, Writing the initial and final draft. FK: Supervision, Writing the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taibe Kulaksız.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Marmara University, Institute of Educational Sciences Research Ethics Committee provided ethics approval for this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kulaksız, T., Karaca, F. A path model of contextual factors influencing science teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educ Inf Technol 28, 3001–3026 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11301-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11301-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation