Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 September 2016

Abstract

This review was designed to further our understanding of the link between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their educational uses of technology. The synthesis of qualitative findings integrates the available evidence about this relationship with the ultimate goal being to facilitate the integration of technology in education. A meta-aggregative approach was utilized to analyze the results of the 14 selected studies. The findings are reported in terms of five synthesis statements, describing (1) the bi-directional relationship between pedagogical beliefs and technology use, (2) teachers’ beliefs as perceived barriers, (3) the association between specific beliefs with types of technology use, (4) the role of beliefs in professional development, and (5) the importance of the school context. By interpreting the results of the review, recommendations are provided for practitioners, policy makers, and researchers focusing on pre- and in-service teacher technology training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers. No. 41. Paris OECD

  • Arntzen, J., & Krug, D. (2011). ICT ecologies of learning: Active socially engaged learning, resiliency and leadership. In S. D’Agustino (Ed.), Adaptation, resistance and access to instructional technologies: assessing future trends in education (pp. 332–354). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1991). Theory into practice: How do we link? In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future. Libraries Unlimited: Englewood, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, S., Benz, C. R., Lasley, T. J., II, & Raisch, C. D. (1998). Exemplary technology use in elementary classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31, 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrett, B., Murphy, J., & Sullivan, J. (2012). Administrator insights and reflections: Technology integration in schools. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 200–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding a teacher’s knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 35–65). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. L. (2011). Fostering Taiwanese EFL teachers’ constructivist instructional beliefs through teaching goals and ICT use. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20, 373–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cviko, A., McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2012). Teachers enacting a technology-rich curriculum for emergent literacy. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denessen, E. (2000). Opvattingen over onderwijs (Beliefs about education). Apeldoorn: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Lee, M. H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers’ epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers and Education, 57, 1469–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2015). Essentials of PBL implementation: Fostering collaboration, transforming roles, and scaffolding learning. In A. Walker, H. Leary, C. Hmelo-Silver, & P. A. Ertmer (Eds.), Essential readings in problem-based learning (pp. 89–106). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teacher beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st century teaching and learning. In H. R. Fives & M. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs (pp. 403–418). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fives, H., & Gill, M. G. (Eds.). (2015). International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2001). On ‘systematic’ reviews of research literatures: A ‘narrative’ response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 543–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, J. J., Lumpe, A. T., Czerniak, C. M., & Egan, V. (2002). From beliefs to actions: the beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannes, K., & Lockwood, C. (2011). Pragmatism as the philosophical underpinning of the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 1632–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannes, K., Lockwood, C., & Pearson, A. (2010). A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 1736–1743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannes, K., Raes, E., Vangenechten, K., Heyvaert, M., & Dochy, F. (2013). Experiences from employees with team learning in a vocational learning or work setting: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Research Review, 10, 116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joanna Briggs Institute. (2014). Joanna Briggs institute reviewers’ manual: methodology for JBI umbrella reviews. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 581–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N., & Kaya, E. (1959). The construction and factor analytic validation of scales to measure attitudes toward education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 19, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, R., Miller, B. G., Amador, J., Desjardins, C. D., & Hall, C. (2015). Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre-service teachers’ reflective practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 809–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopcha, T. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krug, D., & Arntzen, J. (2010). Ecologies of learning: Efficacious learning and ICT pedagogical and technological adaptability. In S. Mukerji & P. Tripathi (Eds.), Cases on interactive technology environments and transnational collaboration: concerns and perspectives (pp. 74–93). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K., & Pellegrino, J. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2005). Changes in educational beliefs and classroom practices of teachers and students in rich technology-based classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14, 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., & Chan, B. C. (2007). MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48, 474–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., Tondeur, J., Nastiti, H., & Pagram, J. (2014). Educational innovations and pedagogical beliefs: The case of a professional development program for Indonesian teachers. Journal of Applied Research in Education, 18, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., Zhao, Y., Tondeur, J., Chai, S. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Bridging the Gap: Technology Trends and Use of Technology in Schools. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. M. C., Wang, P. Y., & Lin, I. (2012). Pedagogy * technology: A two-dimensional model for teachers’ ICT integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1012–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., & Vallance, M. (2008). The impact of synchronous inter-networked teacher training in Information and Communication Technology integration. Computers & Education, 51, 34–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzen, N., & Edmunds, J. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for change: The role of professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2003). Theories of learning and their application to technology. In H. F. O’Neil Jr. & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Technology applications in education: A learning view (pp. 127–157). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, H., & Russell, M. (2012). Understanding factors associated with teacher-directed student use of technology in elementary classrooms: A structural equation modeling approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 652–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51, 1523–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(2), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitz, J., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. T. (2000). Constructivist-compatible beliefs and practices among U. S. teachers. Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. Retrieved from http://www.crito.uci.edu/TLC/FINDINGS/REPORT4/REPORT4.PDF.

  • Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102–119). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. Rath & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Advances in Teacher Education series, 6 (pp. 1–22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010a). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, G. Y., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010b). Investigating teachers educational beliefs in Chinese primary schools: socio-economical and geographical perspectives. Asia-pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., Zhu, Ch., & Yu, K. (2012). Challenging science teachers’ beliefs and practices through a video-case-based intervention in China’s primary schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2010). An overview of progress and problems in educational technology. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 1, 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L. (1999). Realizing our potential: Understanding and developing capacity for lasting improvement. School effectiveness and school improvement, 10, 503–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., Valcke, M., & van Braak, J. (2008a). Exploring the link between teachers’ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2541–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., Kershaw, L., Vanderlinde, R., & van Braak, J. (2013). Getting inside the black box of technology integration in education: Teachers stimulated recall of classroom observations. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 434–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & van Braak, J. (2008b). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 24(6), 494–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: a synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2010). Transforming American Education: Learning powered by technology. National Educational Technology Plan, 2010. Retrieved October 29, 2011, from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010.

  • Vanderlinde, R., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Using an online tool to support school-based ICT policy planning in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 26(5), 296–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W., Watson, S., & Reigeluth, C. (2012). A systemic integration of technology for new-paradigm education. Educational Technology, 52(5), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American educational research journal, 39(1), 165–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Studies, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Jo Tondeur & Johan van Braak

  2. Interfaculty Department for Teacher Education, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

    Jo Tondeur & Peggy A. Ertmer

  3. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Jo Tondeur & Peggy A. Ertmer

  4. Instructional Systems Technology, School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich

Authors
  1. Jo Tondeur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Johan van Braak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peggy A. Ertmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jo Tondeur.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9492-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P.A. et al. Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Education Tech Research Dev 65, 555–575 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation