Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical Characteristics of Small Bowel Tumors Diagnosed by Double-Balloon Endoscopy: KASID Multi-Center Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Small bowel tumors are relatively rare, and their confirmative diagnosis before surgery is not easy.

Aims

This study was performed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with small bowel tumors who received double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). Secondary end points were to evaluate the usefulness and safety of DBE for the diagnosis of patients with suspected SB tumors derived from other previous procedures.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive DBE examinations to explore the small intestine in eight university hospitals over a 5-year period.

Results

A total of 877 DBE examinations (per oral 487, per anal 390) were performed in 645 patients (405 males, mean age 48.2 years). Small bowel tumors were diagnosed in 112 patients (17.4%), of which 38 patients had benign polyps, 29 had gastrointestinal stromal tumors/leiomyomata, 18 had lymphomas, 14 had adenocarcinomas, five had metastatic or invasive cancers, five had lipomas, and three patients had cystic tumors. The main reasons for DBE among patients with small bowel tumors were obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB, 40.2%) followed by abnormal imaging study (25.2%). The concordance rate of diagnoses based on DBE with diagnoses based on small bowel follow-through, CT, and capsule endoscopy among patients with small bowel tumors was 68.9% (42/61), 75.3% (70/93), and 78.3% (18/23), respectively. Therapeutic plans were changed due to the DBE results in 64.2% of patients with small bowel tumors.

Conclusions

Approximately one-sixth of patients who received DBE had small bowel tumors, and the most common reason for DBE among patients with small bowel tumors was OGIB. DBE is a useful method for the confirmative diagnosis of small bowel tumors and has a good clinical impact on therapeutic plans and short-term clinical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paski SC, Semrad CE. Small bowel tumors. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2009;19:461–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schottenfeld D, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Vigneau FD. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of neoplasia in the small intestine. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19:58–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jung KW, Won YJ, Park S, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality and survival in 2005. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24:995–1003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobrin GM, Pittman RH, Lewis BS. Increased diagnostic yield of small bowel tumors with capsule endoscopy. Cancer. 2006;107:22–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Urbain D, De Looze D, Demedts I, et al. Video capsule endoscopy in small-bowel malignancy: a multicenter Belgian study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:408–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Estévez E, González-Conde B, Vázquez-Iglesias JL, et al. Incidence of tumoral pathology according to study using capsule endoscopy for patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1776–1780.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwartz GD, Barkin JS. Small-bowel tumors detected by wireless capsule endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:1026–1030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey AA, Debinski HS, Appleyard MN, et al. Diagnosis and outcome of small bowel tumors found by capsule endoscopy: a three-center Australian experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2237–2243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rondonotti E, Pennazio M, Toth E, et al. Small-bowel neoplasms in patients undergoing video capsule endoscopy: a multicenter European study. Endoscopy. 2008;40:488–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pasha SF, Sharma VK, Carey EJ, et al. Utility of video capsule endoscopy in the detection of small bowel tumors. A single center experience of 1000 consecutive patients. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, 2007 June 8–10; Madrid, Spain. Abstract 45.

  11. Ross A, Mehdizadeh S, Tokar J, et al. Double balloon enteroscopy detects small bowel mass lesions missed by capsule endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:2140–2143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chong AK, Chin BW, Meredith CG. Clinically significant small-bowel pathology identified by double-balloon enteroscopy but missed by capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:445–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Postgate A, Despott E, Burling D, et al. Significant small-bowel lesions detected by alternative diagnostic modalities after negative capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1209–1214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:216–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fry LC, Neumann H, Kuester D, et al. Small bowel polyps and tumours: endoscopic detection and treatment by double-balloon enteroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:135–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Almeida N, Figueiredo P, Lopes S, et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy and small bowel tumors: a South-European single-center experience. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:1520–1524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitsui K, Tanaka S, Yamamoto H, et al. Role of double-balloon endoscopy in the diagnosis of small-bowel tumors: the first Japanese multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:498–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marmo R, Rotondano G, Casetti T, et al. Degree of concordance between double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2009;41:587–592.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the 2007 Fujinon Grant, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases.

Conflicts of interest

Drs Bo-In Lee, Hwang Choi, Kyu-Yong Choi, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Hyun-Joo Jang, Chang-Soo Eun, Jae Hee Cheon, Sung Jae Shin, Jin-Oh Kim, Moon-Sung Lee, and Jai-Hyun Choi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwang Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, BI., Choi, H., Choi, KY. et al. Clinical Characteristics of Small Bowel Tumors Diagnosed by Double-Balloon Endoscopy: KASID Multi-Center Study. Dig Dis Sci 56, 2920–2927 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1839-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1839-z

Keywords

Navigation