Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of the water extracts of propolis on stimulation and inhibition of different cells

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The water extracts of propolis (WEP) could inhibit growth of different cell lines namely McCoy, HeLa, SP2/0, HEp-2, and BHK21 and stimulate growth of normal cell named human lymphocyte, rat kidney, rat liver, and rat spleen. In these experiments 1 and 2 mg of WEP were added to 1 ml RPMI media with 5% FCS. Cell counts and cell viability of propolis-treated and propolis-free cells were assessed by Trypan blue dye exclusion test and MTT assay. The results showed that in case of McCoy, HeLa, SP20, HEp-2, and BHK21 cell lines, the water extracts of propolis could inhibit cell growth as well as reduction on size of the cells. In contrast the same amount of WEP could stimulate growth of normal cells up to 60% with the same concentration used for cell lines. Thus our study indicates that although WEP consists only of the soluble part of propolis, it enables to inhibit different cell lines and increase growth of normal cells. This indicates also that WEP contains the specific compounds with bioactivity against cell lines. Although propolis contain different number of compounds it is clear that WEP has enough biological compounds useful for the treatment of some diseases, medical and related applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akao Y, Maruyama H, Matsumoto K, Ohguchi K, Nishizawa K, Sakamoto T, Araki Y, Mishima S, Nozawa Y (2003) Cell growth inhibitory effect of cinnamic acid derivatives from propolis on human tumor cell lines. Biol Pharm Bull 26:1057–1059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyazicioglu Y, Deger O, Ovali E, Barlak Y, Hosver I, Tekelioglu Y, Karahan SC (2005) Effects of Turkish pollen and propolis extracts on respiratory burst for K-562 cell lines. Int Immunopharmacol 5:1652–1657

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bankova VS, De Castro SL, Marcucci MC (2000) Propolis recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 31:3–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller JM, Franklin I (1990) Antibiotic activity of natural products: 1. Propolis. Microbios 62:19–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC (2002) Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Analysis 10:178–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao C, Carothers AM, Grunberger D, Solomon G, Preston GA, Barrett JC (1995) Apoptosis and altered redox state induced by caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) in transformed rat fibroblast cells. Cancer Res 55:3576–3583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Roberts DA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric methods for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grunberger D, Banerjee R, Eisinger K, Oltz EM, Efros L, Caldwell M, Estevez V, Nakanishi K (1988) Preferential cytotoxicity on tumor cells by caffeic acid phenethyl ester isolated from propolis. Experientia 44:230–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guarini L, Su ZZ, Zucker S, Lin J, Grunberger D, Fisher PB (1992) Growth inhibition and modulation of antigenic phenotype in human melanoma and glioblastoma multiforme cells by caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE). Cell Mol Biol 38:513–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin T (2006) Natural products and the treatment of leukemia. Leuk Res 30:649–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hausen BM, Evers P, Stuwe HT, Konig WA, Wollenweber E (1992) Propolis allergy (IV). Studies with further sensitizers from propolis and constituents common to propolis, poplar buds and balsam of Peru. Contact Derm 26:34–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu F, Hepburn HR, Li Y, Chen M, Radloff SE, Daya S (2005) Effects of ethanol and water extracts of propolis (bee glue) on acute inflammatory animal models. J Ethnopharmacol 100:276–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeno K, Ikeno T, Miyazawa C (1991) Effects of propolis on dental caries in rats. Caries Res 25:347–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil ML (2006) Biological activity of bee propolis in health and disease. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 7:22–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JD, Liu L, Guo W, Meydani M (2006) Chemical structure of flavonols in relation to modulation of angiogenesis and immune-endothelial cell adhesion. J Nutr Biochem 17:165–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimoto T, Koya-Miyata S, Hino K, Micallef MJ, Hanaya T, Arai S, Ikeda M, Kurimoto M (2001) Pulmonary carcinogenesis induced by ferric nitrilotriacetate in mice and protection from it by Brazilian propolis and artepillin C. Virchows Arch 438:259–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Soh JW, Xing WQ, Mao Y, Matsuno T, Weinstein IB (2001) PM-3, a benzo-gamma-pyran derivative isolated from propolis, inhibits growth of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res 21:1665–1671

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci MC, Ferreres F, Garcia-Viguera C, Bankova VS, De Castro SL, Dantas AP, Valente PH, Paulino N (2001) Phenolic compounds from Brazilian propolis with pharmacological activities. J Ethnopharmacol 74:105–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marinova D, Ribarova F, Atanassova M (2005) Total phenolics and total flavonoids in Bulgarian fruits and vegetables. J Univ Chem Technol Metall 40:255–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markham KR (1982) Techniques of flavonid Identification. Academic press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishima S, Narita Y, Chikamatsu S, Inoh Y, Ohta S, Yoshida C, Araki Y, Akao Y, Suzuki KM, Nozawa Y (2005) Effects of propolis on cell growth and gene expression in HL-60 cells. J Ethnopharmacol 99:5–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mosmann T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods 65:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noelker C, Bacher M, Gocke P, Wei X, Klockgether T, Du Y, Dodel R (2005) The flavanoide caffeic acid phenethyl ester blocks 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neurotoxicity. Neurosci Lett 383:39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orsi RO, Sforcin JM, Funari SR, Bankova V (2005) Effects of Brazilian and Bulgarian propolis on bactericidal activity of macrophages against Salmonella typhimurium. Int Immunopharmacol 5:359–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popeskovic D, Kepcija D, Dimitijevic D, Stojanovic N (1980) The antioxidative properties of propolis and some of its components. Acta veterinaria (Beograd) 30:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CV, Desai D, Rivenson A, Simi B, Amin S, Reddy BS (1995) Chemoprevention of colon carcinogenesis by phenylethyl-3-methylcaffeate. Cancer Res 55:2310–2315

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CV, Desai D, Simi B, Kulkarni N, Amin S, Reddy BS (1993) Inhibitory effect of caffeic acid esters on azoxymethane-induced biochemical changes and aberrant crypt foci formation in rat colon. Cancer Res 53:4182–4188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro LR, Mantovani MS, Ribeiro DA, Salvadori DM (2006) Brazilian natural dietary components (annatto, propolis and mushrooms) protecting against mutation and cancer. Hum Exp Toxicol 25:267–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robyt J, French D (1963) Action pattern and specificity of an amylase from Bacillus subtilis. Arch Biochem Biophys 100:451–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salatino A, Teixeira EW, Negri G, Message D (2005) Origin and chemical variation of brazilian propolis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaya ACHF, Souza KS, Marcucci MC, Cunha IBS, Shimizu MT (2004) Analysis of the composition of Brazilian propolis extracts by chromatography and evaluation of their in vitro activity against Gram-positive bacteria. Braz J Microbiol 35:104–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller S, Gazda G, Krol W, Czuba Z, Zajusz A, Gabrys J, Shani J (1989a) The ability of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) to protect mice against gamma irradiation. Z Naturforsch [C] 44:1049–1052

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheller S, Krol W, Swiacik J, Owczarek S, Gabrys J, Shani J (1989b) Antitumoral property of ethanolic extract of propolis in mice-bearing Ehrlich carcinoma, as compared to bleomycin. Z Naturforsch [C] 44:1063–1065

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su ZZ, Lin J, Prewett M, Goldstein NI, Fisher PB (1995) Apoptosis mediates the selective toxicity of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) toward oncogene-transformed rat embryo fibroblast cells. Anticancer Res 15:1841–1848

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Kianizadeh and Dr Toroghi for their support and stimulating discussion. Also we are thankful from Kohe Dasht Company for preparation of natural and high quality of propolis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Fathi Najafi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Najafi, M.F., Vahedy, F., Seyyedin, M. et al. Effect of the water extracts of propolis on stimulation and inhibition of different cells. Cytotechnology 54, 49–56 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-007-9067-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-007-9067-2

Keywords

Navigation