Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design and Analysis of Supply Chain Networks with Low Carbon Emissions

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low carbon supply chain network design is a multi-objective decision-making problem that involves a trade-off between low carbon emissions and cost. This study calculates the carbon footprint, wherein the greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions data are based on carbon footprint standards. Many firms have redesigned their supply chain networks to reduce their GHG emissions. Furthermore, the production capacities and costs are collected and evaluated by using Pareto optimal solutions. In order to achieve the optimal solutions, a normal constraint method is used to formulate a mathematical model to meet two objectives: low carbon emissions and low cost. A case study is also presented to demonstrate the predictive ability of this model. The result shows that it is possible to reduce carbon emissions and lower cost simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., & Bahreininejad, A. (2012). Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Applied Soft Computing, 12, 1668–1677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amini, M., & Li, H. (2011). Supply chain configuration for diffusion of new products: An integrated optimization approach. Omega, 39, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azadi, M., Jafarian, M., Farzipoor Saen, R., & Mirhedayatian, S. M. (2015). A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Computers and Operations Research, 54, 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baud-Lavigne, B., Agard, B., & Penz, B. (2014). Environmental constraints in joint product and supply chain design optimization. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 76, 16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, M. (2015). Low carbon supply chain configuration for a new product - a goal programming approach. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 6588–6610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSI. (2008). PAS 2050 specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London: BSI British Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A., & Paquet, M. (2011). Designing supply chains with sustainability considerations. Production Planning and Control, 22, 727–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2012). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operation (6th ed.). New Jersey, Pearson: Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Hu, L., & Song, M. (2016). Production optimization considering environmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, Part 2, 1600–1607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., & Gunasekaran, A. (2016). The sustainable humanitarian supply chain design: agility, adaptability and alignment. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19, 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Samar Ali, S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, K., Kannan, D., Diabat, A., & Jha, P. C. (2015). A multi-criteria optimization approach to manage environmental issues in closed loop supply chain network design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100, 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, T. (2012). Low carbon and green supply chains: the legal drivers and commercial pressures. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hua, G., Cheng, T. C. E., & Wang, S. (2011). Managing carbon footprints in inventory management. International Journal of Production Economics, 132, 178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2006). ISO14064: Greenhouse gases Part 1: specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. Switzerland, Geneva.

  • ISO (2012). ISO/TR 14047, Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14044 to impact assessment situations.

  • Jayal, A. D., Badurdeen, F., Dillon, O. W, Jr., & Jawahir, I. S. (2010). Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2, 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, M., Granda-Marulanda, N. A., & Down, I. (2014). The impact of carbon policies on supply chain design and logistics of a major retailer. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 453–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, K. (2013). Extending the use of institutional theory in operations and supply chain management research: Review and research suggestions. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33, 1318–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki, T., Yamada, T., Itsubo, N. & Inoue, M. (2015). Multi criteria simulation model for lead times, costs and CO2 emissions in a low-carbon supply chain network. Procedia CIRP, 329–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T.-C., Smith, S., Smith, G. C., & Huang, S. H. (2016). A predictive product attribute driven eco-design process using depth-first search. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, Part 4, 3201–3210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T., Chen, H., Liu, C., Tu, J.-C., & Yeh, T.-C. (2014a). Applying multi-objective planning in low-carbon product design. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T., Huang, M.-L., Hsu, C., Lin, C., Hsieh, C.-C., & Chu, C.-H. (2015). Application of data quality indicator of carbon footprint and water footprint. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 2, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T. C. (2013). The construction of a collaborative framework in support of low carbon product design. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29, 174–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, T. C., Chen, G. Y.-H., Wang, M. L., & Ho, M. W. (2014b). Carbon footprint inventory route planning and selection of hot spot suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KYOTO. (1997). Kyoto protocol [Online]. Kyoto, Japan: http://www.kyotoprotocol.com/. 2016.

  • Lee, K.-H. (2011). Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: The case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 1216–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H., & Cheong, I. M. (2011). Measuring a carbon footprint and environmental practice: The case of Hyundai Motors Co. (HMC). Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111, 961–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, S. A., Narasimhan, R., & Decampos, H. A. (2014). Supply chain design: Issues, challenges, frameworks and solutions. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 1887–1896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, M. T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-Da-gama, F. (2009). Facility location and supply chain management—a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 401–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messac, A., Ismail-Yahaya, A., & Mattson, C. A. (2003). The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto frontier. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 25, 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Qasemi-Kordkheili, P., Kouchaki-Penchah, H., & Riahi-Dorcheh, F. (2016). Applying optimization techniques to improve of energy efficiency and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions of wheat production. Energy, 103, 672–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, W., & Shu, J. (2015). Trade-off between service time and carbon emissions for safety stock placement in multi-echelon supply chains. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 6701–6718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45, 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris. (2015). Paris agreement[Online]. Paris, France: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf. 2016.

  • Ren, J., Bian, Y., Xu, X., & He, P. (2015). Allocation of product-related carbon emission abatement target in a make-to-order supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 80, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., & Dhavale, D. G. (2015). Supplier selection for sustainable operations: A triple-bottom-line approach using a Bayesian framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 166, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S. (2013). A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decision Support Systems, 54, 1513–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming for developing low carbon supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 8182–8192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J.-S., & Lee, K.-M. (2010). Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J. C. P., Wang, L., & Ho, J. C. (2012a). The impacts of technology evolution on market structure for green products. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 55, 1381–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J. P., Chu, C.-H., & Wang, Y.-T. (2012b). A decision support system to estimate the carbon emission and cost of product designs. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 13, 1037–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundarakani, B., de Souza, R., Goh, M., Wagner, S. M., & Manikandan, S. (2010). Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 128, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, D., Song, P., Zhong, F. & Li, C. 2012. Research on evaluation index system of low-carbon manufacturing industry. Energy Procedia, 16, Part A, 541–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, S.-C., & Hung, S.-W. (2014). A strategic decision-making model considering the social costs of carbon dioxide emissions for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Environmental Management, 133, 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSMC. (2013). Corporate social responsibility report [Online]. Taiwan: TSMC: http://www.tsmc.com/download/ir/annualReports/2013/english/annual2013e.pdf.

  • Urata, T., Yamada, T., & Itsubo, N. (2015). Modeling and balancing for costs and \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) emissions in global supply chain network among Asian countries. Procedia CIRP, 26, 664–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.-B., Zhang, H.-L., Lu, X.-H., Wang, M., Chu, Q.-Q., Wen, X.-Y., et al. (2016). Lowering carbon footprint of winter wheat by improving management practices in North China Plain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, Part 1, 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, H. J., & Dunn, S. C. (1995). Environmentally responsible logistics systems. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 25, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., Song, M., & Yang, L. (2015). Advances in energy and environmental issues in China: Theory, models, and applications. Annals of Operations Research, 228, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Guo, J., & Ma, S. (2016). Low-carbon city logistics distribution network design with resource deployment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 119, 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung, W. K. C., Chan, H. K., So, J. H. T., Wong, D. W. C., Choi, A. C. K., & Yue, T. M. (2011). A life-cycle assessment for eco-redesign of a consumer electronic product. Journal of Engineering Design, 22, 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Shah, N., Wassick, J., Helling, R., & van Egerschot, P. (2014). Sustainable supply chain optimisation: An industrial case study. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 74, 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45, 4333–4355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-Lang Tseng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, TC., Tseng, ML., Chen, HM. et al. Design and Analysis of Supply Chain Networks with Low Carbon Emissions. Comput Econ 52, 1353–1374 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9675-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9675-7

Keywords

Navigation