Abstract
In a recent paper, van Binsbergen and Brandt (Computational Economics, 29, 355–367, 2007), using the method of Brandt et al. (Review of Financial Studies, 18, 831–873, 2005), argue, in the context of a portfolio choice problem with CRRA preferences, that value function iteration (VFI) is inferior to portfolio weight iteration (PWI), when a Taylor approximation is used. In particular, they report that the value function iteration produces highly inaccurate solutions when risk aversion is high and the investment horizon long. We argue that the reason for the deterioration of VFI is the high nonlinearity of the value function and illustrate that if one uses a natural and economically-motivated transformation of the value function, namely the certainty equivalent, the VFI approach produces very accurate results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balduzzi P., Lynch A. (1999) Transaction costs and predictability: Some utility cost calculations. Journal of Financial Economics 52: 47–78
Barberis N. (2000) Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. Journal of Finance 55: 225–264
Brandt, M. W. (2004). Portfolio choice problems. In Y. Ait-Sahalia, & L. P. Hansen (Eds.), Handbook of financial econometrics, Elsevier, forthcoming.
Brandt M.W., Goyal A., Santa-Clara P., Stroud J.R. (2005) A simulation approach to dynamic portfolio choice with an application to learning about return predictability. Review of Financial Studies 18: 831–873
Brennan M.J., Schwartz E.S., Lagnado R. (1997) Strategic asset allocation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 21: 1377–1403
Campbell J.Y., Viceira L.M. (1999) Consumption and portfolio decisions when expected returns are time varying. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 433–495
Cox J.C., Huang C. (1989) Optimal portfolio and consumption policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process. Journal of Economic Theory 49: 33–83
Detemple J.B., Garcia R., Rindisbacher M. (2003) A Monte Carlo method for optimal portfolios. Journal of Finance 58: 410–446
Garlappi L., Skoulakis G. (2008) A state variable decomposition approach for solving portfolio choice problems. University of Texas at Austin, Working paper
Judd K. (1998) Numerical methods in economics. MIT Press, Cambridge
Longstaff F.A., Schwartz E.S. (2001) Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Review of Financial Studies 14: 113–147
Merton R.C. (1973) An intertemporal asset pricing model. Econometrica 41: 867–888
Savits T.H. (2006) Some statistical applications of Faà di Bruno. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 97: 2131–2140
Tsitsiklis J.N., Van Roy B. (2001) Regression methods for pricing complex American-style options. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 12: 694–703
van Binsbergen J.H., Brandt M.W. (2007) Solving dynamic portfolio choice problems by recursing on optimized portfolio weights or on the value function? Computational Economics 29: 355–367
Willink R. (2005) Normal moments and Hermite polynomials. Statistics and Probability Letters 73: 271–275
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garlappi, L., Skoulakis, G. Numerical Solutions to Dynamic Portfolio Problems: The Case for Value Function Iteration using Taylor Approximation. Comput Econ 33, 193–207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-008-9156-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-008-9156-0