Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regulating Information Disclosure in Mutual Fund Advertising in the United States: Will Consumers Utilize Cost Information?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consumer decision making with regard to mutual funds is less than rational. Consumers tend to focus on past performance and virtually ignore a variable which has a more definite (and negative) impact on wealth—cost. FINRA, the mutual fund industry’s self-regulatory body in the USA, has recently changed its regulations for fund advertising to require that cost information be reported when performance information is present. We conducted an exploratory conjoint study to examine whether consumers might, in fact, use the additional information, and found that despite the highly salient presence of expense information, consumers overwhelmingly continue to use past performance when forming mutual fund preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, G. J., Jones, J. D., & Nigro, P. J. (1998). Mutual fund shareholders: Characteristics, investor knowledge, and sources of information. Financial Services Review, 7, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arteaga, K. R., Ciccotello, C. S., & Grant, C. T. (1998). New equity funds: Marketing and performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 54, 43–49. Nov/Dec.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261–292, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. M., Odean, T., & Zheng, Lu. (2005). Out of sight, out of mind: The effects of expenses on mutual fund flows. Journal of Business, 78, 2095–2119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, J. C. (2005). The mutual fund industry 60 years later: For better or worse? Financial Analysts Journal, 61, 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajtelsmit, V. L., & Bernasek, A. (1996). Why do women invest differently than men. Association for Financial Counseling and Planning Education, 7, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, N., Fitzsimmons, G. J., & Prince, R. A. (1996). An individual level analysis of the mutual fund investment decision. Journal of Financial Services Research, 10, 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52, 56–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. H. (2005). Conjoint analysis and canonical correlation. Singapore Medical Journal, 46, 514–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. B. (1996). Smokers’ knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: Health policy implications. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feuerborn, T. A. (2001). New mutual funds: Misplaced marketing through consumer misdirection. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. P. (2007). The mutual fund distribution expense mess. The Journal of Corporation Law, 32, 739–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • FINRA (2008). About the financial industry regulatory authority. http://www.finra.org/AboutFINRA/CorporateInformation/index.htm.

  • Gardner, M. P. (1983). Advertising effects on attributes recalled and criteria used for brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 310–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, M. J. (1996). Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds. The Journal of Finance, 51, 783–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslem, J. A., Baker, H. K., & Smith, D. M. (2008). Performance and characteristics of actively managed retail equity mutual funds with diverse expense ratios. Financial Services Review, 17, 31–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houge, T., & Wellman, J. (2007). The use and abuse of mutual fund expenses. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhmann, B. A., & Bhattacharyya, N. (2005). Does mutual fund advertising provide necessary investment information? The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23, 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito, R. A. (1992). Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. Journal of Law & Economics, 35, 45–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, P. C., & Wu, J. S. (2000). Truth in mutual fund advertising: Evidence on future performance and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 55, 937–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. A., & Smythe, T. (2003). The information content of mutual fund print advertising. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 37, 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Lesseig, V., & Smythe, T. (2005). Financial advisors and mutual fund selection. Journal of Financial Planning, 18(3), 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J., & Kaas, K. P. (2002). Advertising in the mutual fund business: The role of judgmental heuristics in private investors’ evaluation of risk and return. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 7, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karrh, J. A. (2004). Does advertising influence investors? Evidence and research propositions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kermer, D., Driver-Linn, E., Wilson, T., & Gilbert, D. (2006). Loss aversion is an effective forecasting error. Psychological Science, 17, 649–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkeamaki, T., Puttonen, V., & Smythe, T. (2007). Advertising and mutual fund asset flows. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25, 434–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozup, J., Howlett, E., & Pagano, M. (2008). The effects of summary information on consumer perceptions of mutual fund characteristics. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 42, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacko, J., & Pappalardo, J. (2004). The Effect of mortgage broker compensation disclosures on consumers and competition: A controlled experiment. Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Economics Staff Report.

  • Lesseig, V., Long, D. M., & Smythe, T. (2002). Gains to mutual fund sponsors offering multiple share class funds. Journal of Financial Research, 25, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B. G. (1995). Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991. Journal of Finance, 50, 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J. (1989). Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity interpretation. In P. Cafferata & A. Tybout (Eds.), Cognitive and affective responses to advertising. Lexington: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1991). Exploring differences in males’ and females’ processing strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Sternthal, B. (1991). Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Securities Dealers Notice to Members 06-48, September 2006.

  • Orme, B. K. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis. Madison: Research Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratneshwar, S., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension’s role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effect on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. S., & Kassarjian, H. H. (1991). Handbook of consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufano, P., & Sevick, M. (1997). Board structure and fee-setting in the U.S. mutual fund industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 46, 321–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & McNaughton, M. (2007). Gender differences in risk aversion and expected retirement benefits. Financial Analysts Journal, 63, 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & Rip, R. D. (1980). Product class advertising effects on first time buyers’ decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea J. S. Stanaland.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 8 Ad information content

Appendix 2

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pontari, B.A., Stanaland, A.J.S. & Smythe, T. Regulating Information Disclosure in Mutual Fund Advertising in the United States: Will Consumers Utilize Cost Information?. J Consum Policy 32, 333–351 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9107-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-009-9107-8

Keywords

Navigation