Abstract
Uncertainty quantification is currently one of the leading challenges in the geosciences, in particular in reservoir modeling. A wealth of subsurface data as well as expert knowledge are available to quantify uncertainty and state predictions on reservoir performance or reserves. The geosciences component within this larger modeling framework is partially an interpretive science. Geologists and geophysicists interpret data to postulate on the nature of the depositional environment, for example on the type of fracture system, the nature of faulting, and the type of rock physics model. Often, several alternative scenarios or interpretations are offered, including some associated belief quantified with probabilities. In the context of facies modeling, this could result in various interpretations of facies architecture, associations, geometries, and the way they are distributed in space. A quantitative approach to specify this uncertainty is to provide a set of alternative 3D training images from which several geostatistical models can be generated. In this paper, we consider quantifying uncertainty on facies models in the early development stage of a reservoir when there is still considerable uncertainty on the nature of the spatial distribution of the facies. At this stage, production data are available to further constrain uncertainty. We develop a workflow that consists of two steps: (1) determining which training images are no longer consistent with production data and should be rejected and (2) to history match with a given fixed training image. We illustrate our ideas and methodology on a test case derived from a real field case of predicting flow in a newly planned well in a turbidite reservoir off the African West coast.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aanonsen, S.I., Nævdal, G., Oliver, D.S., Reynolds, A.C., Vallès, B.: Ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering—a review. SPE J. 14(3), 393–412 (2009)
Abdollahzadeh, A., Reynolds, A., Christie, M., Corne, D., Williams, G., Davies, B.: Estimation of distribution algorithms applied to history matching authors. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 21–23 February 2011, The Woodlands, TX, USA
Agbalaka C.C., Oliver D.S.: Application of the EnKF and localization to automatic history matching of facies distribution and production data. Math. Geosci. 40(4), 353–374 (2008)
Alpak, F., Barton, M., Caers, J.: A flow-based pattern recognition algorithm for rapid quantification of geologic uncertainty. Comput. Geosci. 14(4), 603–621 (2010)
Arnold, D.P., Demyanov, V., Tatum, D., Christie, M., Rojas, T., Corbett, P., Geiger, S.: Hierarchical benchmark case study for history matching, uncertainty quantification and reservoir characterization. Comput. Geosci. 50, 4–15 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.011
Bond, C.E., Gibbs, A., Shipton, Z.K., Jones, S.: What do you think this is? “Conceptual uncertainty” in geoscience interpretation. GSA Today 17, 4–10 (2007)
Caers, J.: History matching under a training image-based geological model constraint. SPE J. 8(3), 218–226 (2003)
Caers, J.: Comparison of the gradual deformation with the probability perturbation method for solving inverse problems. Math. Geol. 39(1), 27–52 (2007)
Caers, J: Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences. Wiley, Chichester (2011)
Caers, J., Hoffman, B.T.: The probability perturbation method: a new look at Bayesian inverse modeling. Math. Geol. 38(1), 81–100 (2006)
Caers, J., Hoffman, B.T., Strebelle, S., Wen, X.-H.: Probabilistic integration of geologic scenarios, seismic and production data—a West Africa turbidite reservoir case study. Leading Edge 25, 240–244 (2006)
Castro, S., Caers, J., Otterlei, C., Meisingset, H., Hoye, T., Gomel, P., Zachariassen, E.: Incorporating 4D seismic data into reservoir models while honoring production and geologic data: a case study. Leading Edge 28(12), 1498–1505 (2009)
Cherpeau, N., Caumon, G., Caers, J., Lévy, B.: Method for stochastic inverse modeling of fault geometry and connectivity using flow data. Math. Geosci. 44(2), 147–168 (2012)
Coumou, D., Matthäi, S., Geiger, S., Driesner, T.: A parallel FE–FV scheme to solve fluid flow in complex geologic media. Comput. Geosci. 34(12), 1697–1707 (2008)
Dogru, A.H., Sunaidi, H.A., Fung, L.S., Habiballah, W.A., Al-Zamel, N., Li, K.G.: A parallel reservoir simulator for large-scale reservoir simulation. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 5(1), 11–23 (2002)
Efendiev, Y., Hou, T., Luo, W.: Preconditioning Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations using coarse-scale models. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28(2), 776–803 (2006)
Evensen, G.: The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dyn. 53(4), 343–367 (2003)
Feyen, L., Caers, J.: Quantifying geological uncertainty for flow and transport modeling in multi-modal heterogeneous formations. Adv. Water Resour. 29(6), 912–929 (2006)
Fu, J., Gómez-Hernández, J.: A blocking Markov chain Monte Carlo Method for inverse stochastic hydrogeological modeling. Math. Geosci. 41(2), 105–128 (2009)
Hoffman, B.T., Caers, J.: Regional probability perturbations for history matching. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 46(1–2), 53–71 (2005)
Hoffman, B.T., Caers, J.: History matching by jointly perturbing local facies proportions and their spatial distribution: application to a North Sea Reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 57(3–4), 257–272 (2007)
Hoffman, B.T., Caers J.K., Wen, X.-H., Strebelle, S.: A practical data-integration approach to history matching: application to a deepwater reservoir. SPE J. 11(4), 464–479 (2006)
Hu, L.-Y.: Extended probability perturbation method for calibrating stochastic reservoir models. Math. Geosci. 40(8), 875–885 (2008)
Li, T., Caers, J.: Solving spatial inverse problems using the probability perturbation method: an S-GEMS implementation. Comput. Geosci. 34(9), 1127–1141 (2008)
Li, H., Caers, J.: Geological modelling and history matching of multi-scale flow barriers in channelized reservoirs: methodology and application. Petrol. Geosci. 17(1), 17–34 (2011)
Liu, N., Oliver D.S.: Ensemble Kalman filter for automatic history matching of geologic facies. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 47(3–4), 147–161 (2005)
Mariethoz, G., Renard, P., Caers, J.: Bayesian inverse problem and optimization with iterative spatial resampling. Water Resour. Res. 46, W11530 (2010). doi:10.1029/2010WR009274
Mosegaard, K., Tarantola, A.: Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 12431–12447 (1995)
Oliver, D.S., Chen, Y.: Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Comput. Geosci. 15(1), 185–221 (2011)
Omre, H., Tjelmeland, H.: Petroleum geostatistics. In: Fifth International Geostatistics Congress, Wollongong, Australia (1996)
Peters, E., Chen, Y., Leeuwenburg, O., Oliver, D.S.: Extended Brugge benchmark case on history matching and optimization within a closed-loop concept. Comput. Geosci. 50, 16–24 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2012.07.018
Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, New York (1959)
Remy, N., Boucher, A., Wu, J.: Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: A User’s Guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
Ronayne, M.J., Gorelick, S.M., Caers, J.: Identifying discrete geologic structures that produce anomalous hydraulic response: an inverse modeling approach. Water Resour. Res. 44, W08426 (2008). doi:10.1029/2007WR006635
Sarma, P., Durlofsky, L.J., Aziz, K.: Kernel principal component analysis for efficient, differentiable parameterization of multipoint geostatistics. Math. Geosci. 40(1), 3–32 (2008)
Scheidt, C., Caers, J.: Representing spatial uncertainty using distances and kernels. Math. Geosci. 41(4), 397–419 (2009a)
Scheidt, C., Caers, J.: Uncertainty quantification in reservoir performance using distances and kernel methods—application to a West-Africa deepwater turbidite reservoir. SPE J. 14(4), 680–692 (2009b)
Scheidt, C., Caers, J.: Bootstrap confidence intervals for reservoir model selection techniques. Comput. Geosci. 14(2), 369–382 (2010)
Strebelle, S.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math. Geol. 34(1), 1–21 (2002)
Strebelle, S., Payrazyan, K., Caers, J.: Modeling of a deepwater turbidite reservoir conditional to seismic data using principal component analysis and multiple-point geostatistics. SPE J. 8(3), 227–235 (2003)
Suzuki, S., Caers, J.: A distance-based prior model parameterization for constraining solutions of spatial inverse problems. Math. Geosci. 40(4), 445–469 (2008)
Suzuki, S., Caumon, G., Caers, J.: Dynamic data integration for structural modeling: model screening approach using a distance-based model parameterization. Comput. Geosci. 12(1), 105–119 (2008)
Tahmasebi, P., Sahimi, M., Mariethoz, G., Hezarkhani, A.: Accelerating geostatistical simulations using graphics processing units. Comput. Geosci. 46, 51–59 (2012)
Tarantola, A.: Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1987)
Tarantola, A.: Popper, Bayes and the inverse problem. Nat. Phys. 2, 492–494 (2006)
Walsh, S.D., Saar, M.O., Bailey, P., Lilja, D.J.: Accelerating geoscience and engineering system simulations on graphics hardware. Comput. Geosci. 35(12), 2353–2364 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, H., Scheidt, C., Fenwick, D. et al. History matching and uncertainty quantification of facies models with multiple geological interpretations. Comput Geosci 17, 609–621 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9343-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9343-5