Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Representing Spatial Uncertainty Using Distances and Kernels

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessing uncertainty of a spatial phenomenon requires the analysis of a large number of parameters which must be processed by a transfer function. To capture the possibly of a wide range of uncertainty in the transfer function response, a large set of geostatistical model realizations needs to be processed. Stochastic spatial simulation can rapidly provide multiple, equally probable realizations. However, since the transfer function is often computationally demanding, only a small number of models can be evaluated in practice, and are usually selected through a ranking procedure. Traditional ranking techniques for selection of probabilistic ranges of response (P10, P50 and P90) are highly dependent on the static property used. In this paper, we propose to parameterize the spatial uncertainty represented by a large set of geostatistical realizations through a distance function measuring “dissimilarity” between any two geostatistical realizations. The distance function allows a mapping of the space of uncertainty. The distance can be tailored to the particular problem. The multi-dimensional space of uncertainty can be modeled using kernel techniques, such as kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) or kernel clustering. These tools allow for the selection of a subset of representative realizations containing similar properties to the larger set. Without losing accuracy, decisions and strategies can then be performed applying a transfer function on the subset without the need to exhaustively evaluate each realization. This method is applied to a synthetic oil reservoir, where spatial uncertainty of channel facies is modeled through multiple realizations generated using a multi-point geostatistical algorithm and several training images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arpat BG (2005) Sequential Simulation with patterns. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, USA, 166 p

  • Arpat BG, Caers J (2007) Stochastic simulation with patterns. Math Geol 39(202):177–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballin PR, Journel AG, Aziz K (1992) Prediction of uncertainty in reservoir performance forecast. JCPT 31(4):52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Batycky RP, Blunt MJ, Thiele MR (1997) A 3D field-scale streamline-based reservoir simulator. SPERE 12(4):246–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg I, Groenen P (1997) Modern multidimensional scaling: theory and applications. Springer, New York, 614 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman AW, Azzalini A (1997) Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis. Oxford University Press, London, 204 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhmann JM (1995) Data clustering and learning. In: Arbib M (ed) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 278–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Draper NR (1975) Robust designs. Biometrica 62(2):347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox TF, Cox MAA (1994) Multidimensional scaling. Chapman and Hall, London, 213 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Damslet E, Hage A, Volder R (1992) Maximum information at minimum cost! A north field development study with an experimental design. JPT 44(12):1350–1356

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubuisson M-P, Jain AK (1994) A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching. In: Proceeding of the international conference on pattern recognition, Jerusalem, vol A, pp 566–568

  • Gilman JR, Meng H-Z, Uland MJ, Dzurman PJ, Cosic S (2002) Statistical ranking of stochastic geomodels using streamline simulation: a field application. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. SPE 77374

  • Journel A, Alabert F (1990) New method for reservoir mapping. JPT 42(2):212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keerthi SS, Lin C-J (2003) Asymptotic behaviors of support vector machines with Gaussian kernel. Neural Comput 15(7):1667–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manceau E, Zabalza-Mezghani I, Roggero F (2001) Use of experimental design to make decisions in an uncertain reservoir environment—from reservoir uncertainties to economic risk analysis. In: OAPEC conference, Rueil, France, 26–28 June 2001

  • McLennan JA, Deutsch CV (2005) Ranking geostatistical realizations by measures of connectivity. In: SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA, international thermal operations and heavy oil symposium, Calgary, Canada. SPE 98168-MS

  • Park K, Caers J (2007) History matching in low-dimensional connectivity-vector space. Unpublished SCRF report 20, Stanford University

  • Sarma P (2006) Efficient closed-loop optimal control of petroleum reservoirs under uncertainty. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, USA, 201 p

  • Scheidt C, Caers J (2008) A new method for uncertainty quantification using distances and kernel methods—application to a deepwater turbidite reservoir. SPE J (submitted)

  • Schöelkopf B, Smola A (2002) Learning with kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, 664 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöelkopf B, Smola A, Muller K-R (1998) Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Comput 10(5):1299–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawe-Taylor J, Cristianni N (2004) Kernel methods for pattern analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 462 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi J, Malik J (2000) Normalized-cut and image segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(8):888–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S, Caers J (2008) A distance based prior model parameterization for constraining solution of spatial inverse problems. Math Geosci 40(4):445–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnick VN (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York, 736 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Céline Scheidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scheidt, C., Caers, J. Representing Spatial Uncertainty Using Distances and Kernels. Math Geosci 41, 397–419 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9186-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9186-0

Keywords

Navigation