Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic analysis and uncertain taxonomic status of threatened Foskett Spring speckled dace

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foskett Spring is a small isolated desert spring in the Warner Basin of Oregon containing an undescribed subspecies of speckled dace protected under the US Endangered Species Act. Uncertainty regarding the taxonomic status of Foskett dace has raised questions about their evolutionary relationship to other more abundant populations in the Warner Basin. To address these questions, we sequenced 1,982 base pairs (bp) of the ND2 and cyt-b genes of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) for 85 fish from Foskett Spring, the surrounding Warner Basin, and the adjacent Goose Lake Basin. We observed 58 unique mtDNA haplotypes defined by 96 bp substitutions in both genes. MtDNA sequences were highly divergent and reciprocally monophyletic between dace from the Warner and Goose Lake Basins, with sequence divergences (5 and 3% at ND2 and cyt-b, respectively) in the range usually observed between fish species. In contrast, mean sequence divergence between Foskett dace and other Warner Basin populations was less than 1%, with no evidence of reciprocal monophyly among mtDNA lineages. These results indicate that Foskett dace and other populations in the Warner Basin are approximately equally diverged from one another evolutionarily, suggesting similar times of divergence since the late Pleistocene. We believe further studies are needed to determine if rapid evolution of novel traits have occurred in dace inhabiting the unique ecological setting of Foskett Spring during the past 10,000 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernatchez L (1995) A role for molecular systematics in defining evolutionary significant units in fishes. Am Fish Soc Symp 17:114–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling TE, Tibbetts AC, Minckley WL, Smith GR (2002) Evolutionary relationships of the Plagopterins (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Cytochrome b sequences. Copeia 2002:665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) ARLEQUIN, version 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1(4):7–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evol Int J org Evol 39:783–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry AJ, Zink RM (1998) Geographic analysis of nucleotide diversity and song sparrow (Aves: Emberizidae) population history. Mol Ecol 7:1303–1313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Y-X (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality against population growth, hitchhiking, and background selection. Genetics 147:915–925

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gould WR, Kaya CM (1991) Pharynegeal teeth in the endangered Kendall Warm Springs dace (Rhinichthys osculus thermalis). Copeia 1991:227–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig SM, Beever EA, Chambers SM, Draheim HM, Dugger BD, Dunham S, Elliott-Smith E, Fontaine JB, Kesler DC, Knaus BJ, Lopes IF, Loschl P, Mullins TD, Sheffield LM (2006) Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the US Endangered Species Act. Conserv Biol 20(6):1584–1594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harpending RC (1994) Signature of ancient population growth in a low-resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Hum Biol 66:591–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Lee RN, Hurt CR (2006) The endangered Sonoran topminnow: examination of the species and ESUs using three mtDNA genes. Conserv Genet 7:483–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs CL, Kuhne ER (1937) A new fish of the genus Apocope from a Wyoming warm spring. Occas Pap Mus Zool Univ Mich 343:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbs CL, Miller RR, Hubbs LC (1974) Hydrographic history and relict fishes of the north-central Great Basin. Calif Acad Sci Mem 7:1–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inferences of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB (2002) Evolution after the flood: phylogeography of the desert fish Utah chub. Evol Int J org Evol 56(5):948–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Belk MC (1999) Effects of predation on life-history evolution in Utah chub (Gila atraria). Copeia 1999:948–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JA, Dunn PO, Bouzat JL (2007) Effects of recent population bottlenecks on reconstructing the demographic history of prairie-chickens. Mol Ecol 16(11):2203–2222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya CM, Brussard PF, Cameron DG, Vyse ER (1992) Biochemical genetics and thermal tolerances of Kendall Warm Springs dace (Rhinichthys osculus thermalis) and the Green River speckled dace (R. o. yarrowi). Copeia 1992:528–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (1996) PHYLTEST: Phylogenetic hypothesis testing software, version 2.0. Pennsylvania State University, University Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M (2001) MEGA2: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Arizona State University, Tempe

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DS, Gilbert CR, Hocutt CH, Jenkins RE, McAllister DE, Stauffer JR (1980) Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina Museum of Natural History, Releigh

    Google Scholar 

  • McCusker MR, Parkinson E, Taylor EB (2000) Mitochondrial DNA variation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchis mykiss) across its native range: testing biographical hypotheses and their relevance to conservation. Mol Ecol 9:2089–2108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minckley WL, Hendrickson DA, Bond CE (1986) Geography of western North American freshwater fishes: description and relationships to intracontinential tectonism. In: Hocutt CH, Wiley EO (eds) The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. Wiley, New York, pp 519–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Middle Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neigel JE, Avise JC (1986) Phylogenetic relationships of mitrochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In: Nevo E, Karlin S (eds) Evolutionary processes and theory. Academic Press, New York, pp 515–534

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey DD, Douglas ME, Douglas MR (2004) Small fish in a large landscape: Diversification of Rhinichthys osculus (Cyprinidae) in western North America. Copeia 2:207–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfrender ME, Hicks J, Lynch M (2004) Biogeographic patterns and current distribution of molecular-genetic variation among populations of speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus (Girard). Mol Phylogen Evol 30(3):490–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Posada D, Crandell KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Onsins SE, Rozas J (2002) Statistical properties of new neutrality tests against population growth. Mol Biol Evol 19:2092–2100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reheis M, Sarna-Wojcicki AM, Reynolds RL, Repenning CA, Mifflin MD (2002) Pliocene to middle Pleistocene lakes in the western Great Basin: ages and connections (pp 53–109). In: Hershler R, Madsen DB, Currey DR (eds) Great Basin Aquatic Systems History Smithsonian Contributions to Earth Sciences, vol 33, 405 pp

  • Rogers AR, Harpending H (1992) Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol 9:552–569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DNA SP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:2496–2497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerer PD, Jacobs SE (2006) Hutton Spring Tui Chub & Foskett Spring Speckled Dace Investigations. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Fish Research Project E-2-37, Annual Progress Report, Corvallis

  • Schneider S, Excoffier L (1999) Estimation of past demographic parameters from the distribution of pairwise differences when the mutation rates vary among sites: application to human mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 152:1079–1089

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GR, Dowling T, Gobalet KW, Lugaski T, Shiazawa D, Evans RP (2002) Biogeography and timing of evolutionary events among Great Basin fishes (pp 175–234). In: Hershler R, Madsen DB, Currey DR (eds) Great Basin aquatic systems history, Smithsonian Contributions to Earth Sciences, vol 33, 405 pp

  • Stepine CA, Dillion AK, Brooks MJ, Chase KL, Hubers AN (1997) The evolution of blennioif fishes based on the analysis of mitochondrial 12S rDNA. In: Kocher TD, Stepien CA (eds) Molecular systematics of fishes. Academic, San Diego, pp 245–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL (1999) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM (1996) Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Mortiz C, Mable BK (eds) Molecular systematics, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, New York, pp 407–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor EB, Pollard S, Louie D (1999) Mitochondrial DNA variation in bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) from northwestern North America: implications for zoogeography and conservation. Mol Ecol 8:1155–1170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • US Fish Wildlife Service (1985) Determination of threatened status for Hutton tui chub and Foskett speckled dace. Fed Regist 50:12302–12306

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (1998) Recovery plan for the native fishes of the Warner Basin and Alkali Subbasin. Portland, 86 pp

  • Williams JE, Stern MA, Munhall AV, Anderson GA (1990) Conservation status of threatened fishes in the Warner Basin, Oregon. Great Basin Naturalist 50(3):243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JE, Macdonald CA, Williams CD, Weeks H, Lampman G, Sada DW (2005) Prospects for recovering endemic fishes pursuant to the US Endangered Species Act. Fisheries 30(6):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink RM (2004) The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271(1539):561–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. D. Campton provided valuable input on development of this project. We would like to thank C. W. Kilpatrick, D. Markle, T. Dowling, M. Pfrender, and C. Hurt for assistance with laboratory methods and data analysis. J. Baumsteiger, C. Allen, R. White, A. Mauer, A. Munhall, and S. Reid collected samples used in this study. D. Campton, P. Crandell, D. Markle, and two anonymous reviewers provided critical review and comments that greatly improved this paper. The findings and conclusions in the article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William R. Ardren.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 3.

Appendix 2

See Table 4.

Table 4 Geographical distribution and frequency of speckled dace cyt b mtDNA haplotypes among seven major basins in Oregon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ardren, W.R., Baumsteiger, J. & Allen, C.S. Genetic analysis and uncertain taxonomic status of threatened Foskett Spring speckled dace. Conserv Genet 11, 1299–1315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9959-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-9959-0

Keywords

Navigation