Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The endangered Sonoran topminnow: Examination of species and ESUs using three mtDNA genes

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been controversy over the species status of Sonoran topminnows and debate about the presence of ESUs in the Gila topminnow. From examination of sequence variation at 2626 base pairs over three mtDNA genes, we found a 29 (1.1%) nucleotide genetic difference between Gila and Yaqui topminnows. This provides strong support that these two taxa are separate species, Poeciliopsis occidentalis (Gila topminnow) and P. sonoriensis (Yaqui topminnow) and have been separated for approximately one million years. All the Gila topminnows within Arizona have the same sequence for the three mtDNA genes, that is, there is not reciprocal monophyly for mtDNA sequence data for the two previously designated ESUs. However, evidence of the unique habitat for Monkey Spring, its long-term isolation from other Gila topminnow habitats, and the presence of unique fish and invertebrate taxa in Monkey Spring support the designation of the Monkey Spring topminnows as an ESU. Finally, theoretical considerations using molecular data and estimates of heterozygosity and genetic distance for nuclear genes between populations of the Gila topminnow show that the lack of mtDNA variation is not inconsistent with the level and pattern of nuclear genetic variation observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bermingham E, McCafferty SS, Martin AP (1997) Fish biogeography and molecular clocks: perspectives from the Panamanian Isthmus. In: Kocher TD, Stepien CA (eds). Molecular Systematics of Fishes. Academic, San Diego, pp. 113–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton RE, Milam JE, Roe BA (2001). The complete sequence of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) mitochondrial genome and evolutionary patterns in vertebrate mitochondrial DNA. Genome Res. 11:1958–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell T, Sheffer RS, Hedrick PW (1998) Male development in the endangered Gila topminnow. J. Hered. 89:353–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty R, Nei M (1977) Bottleneck effects on average heterozygosity and genetic distance with the stepwise mutation model. Evolution 31:347–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (1989) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling TE, Tibbetts AC, Minckley WL, Smith GR (2002) Evolutionary relationships of the Plagopterins (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Cytochrome b sequences. Copeia 2002:665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Molec. Ecol. 10:2741 2752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glavac DM, Dean M (1993). Optimization of the Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism (SSCP) technique for detection of point mutations. Hum. Mut. 2:404–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall T (1991–2004) BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor. Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc

  • Hedrick PW (1999) Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53:313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW (2005) Genetics of Populations, 3rd Edition. Jones and Bartlett, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Parker KM (1998) MHC variation in the endangered Gila topminnow. Evolution 52:194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Parker KM, Lee R (2001) Genetic variation in the endangered Gila and Yaqui topminnows: microsatellite and MHC variation. Molec. Ecol. 10:1399–1412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J, Ponniah M, Harwood D, Chenoweth S, Arthington A (1999) Strong genetic structuring in a habitat specialist, the Oxleyan Pygmy Perch Nannopera oxleyana. Heredity 83:5–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, CR (2004) Genetic divergence, population structure and historical demography of rare springsnails (Pyrgulopsis) in the lower Colorado River basin. Molec. Ecol. 13:1173–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hurt CR, Stears-Ellis S, Hughes K, Hedrick PW (2004) Mating behavior in the endangered Sonoran topminnow: speciation in action. Anim. Behav. 67:343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurt CR, Hedrick PW (2003) Initial stages of reproductive isolation in two species of the endangered Sonoran topminnow. Evolution 57:2835–2841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurt CR, Farzin M, Hedrick PW (2005) Premating, not postmating, barriers drive genetic dynamics in experimental hybrid populations of the endangered sonaran topminnow. Genetics, in press

  • Kumar S (1996) PHYLTEST: Phylogenetic hypothesis testing software. Version 2.0. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M (2001) MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  • Li WH (1976) Electrophoretic identity of proteins in a finite population and genetic distance between taxa. Genet. Res. 28:119–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mateos M, Sanjur OI, Vrijenhoek RC (2002) Historical biogeography of the livebearing fish genus Poeciliopsis (Poeciliidae: Cyprinodontiformes). Evolution 56:972–984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melton MA (1960) Origin of the drainage of southeastern Arizona. AZ. Geol. Soc. Digest 3:113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Minckley WL (1973) Keys to native and introduced fishes of Arizona. J. Ariz. Acad. Sci. 6:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Minckley WL (1999) Ecological review and management recommendation for recovery of the endangered Gila topminnow. Great Basin Natur. 59:230–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (1994) Defining “evolutionarily significant units” for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:373–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz C (2002) Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst. Biol. 51:238–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker KM, Sheffer RJ, Hedrick PW (1999) Molecular variation and evolutionarily significant units in the endangered Gila topminnow. Cons. Biol. 13:108–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattro JM, Leberg PL, Douglas ME, Vrijenhoek RC (1996) Molecular evidence for a unique evolutionary lineage of endangered Sonoran desert fish (genus Poeciliopsis). Cons. Biol. 10:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffer RJ, Hedrick PW, Velasco AL (1999) Testing for inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the endangered Gila topminnow. Anim. Cons. 2:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepine CA, Dillion AK, Brooks MJ, Chase KL, Hubers AN (1997) The evolution of blennioid fishes based on an analysis of mitochondrial 12S rDNA. In: Kocher TD, Stepien CA (eds). Molecular Systematics of Fishes. Academic, San Diego, pp. 245–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Takezaki N, Razhetsky A, Nei M (1995) Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:823–833

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vrijenhoek RC, Douglas ME, Meffe GK (1985) Conservation genetic of endangered fish populations in Arizona. Science 229:400–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (1995) Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. Amer. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17:8–27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the financial support from the Arizona Heritage Fund and the Ullman Professorship for this research. We appreciate comments on an earlier version of this manuscript from two anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4501, USA

    P. W. Hedrick, R. N. Lee & C. R. Hurt

Authors
  1. P. W. Hedrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. N. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. R. Hurt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. W. Hedrick.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedrick, P.W., Lee, R.N. & Hurt, C.R. The endangered Sonoran topminnow: Examination of species and ESUs using three mtDNA genes. Conserv Genet 7, 483–492 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9058-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9058-9

Key words:

Search

Navigation