Abstract
Due to societal changes and altered demands for firewood, the traditional forest management of coppicing has been largely abandoned. As a result, many forest herbs that are specifically adapted to regular opening of the canopy, have suffered significant declines in abundance, and the remaining populations of these species often tend to be small and isolated. Reduced population sizes and pronounced spatial isolation may cause loss of within-population genetic diversity and increased between-population differentiation through random genetic drift and inbreeding. In this study, we investigated genetic diversity and genetic structure of 15 populations of the food-deceptive orchid Orchis mascula using AFLP markers. Within-population genetic diversity significantly increased with increasing population size, indicating genetic impoverishment in small populations. Genetic differentiation, on the other hand, was rather low (ΦST = 0.083) and there was no significant relationship between genetic and geographic distances, suggesting substantial gene flow within the study area. However, strong differences in levels of within-population diversity and among-population differentiation were found for populations located in forests that have been regularly coppiced and populations found in forests that were neglected for more than 50 years and that were totally overgrown by shrubs. Our data thus indicate that a lack of coppicing leads to decreased genetic diversity and increased differentiation in this orchid species, most likely as a result of genetic drift following demographic bottlenecks. From a conservation point of view, this study combined with previous results on the demography of O. mascula in relation to forest management illustrates the importance of coppicing in maintaining viable populations of forest herbs in the long-term.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adriaens D, Honnay O, Hermy M (2006) No evidence of a plant extinction debt in highly fragmented calcareous grasslands in Belgium. Biol Conserv 133:212–224
Antonovics J (1971) The effects of a heterogeneous environment on the genetics of natural populations. Am Sci 59:593–599
Barrett SCH, Kohn J (1991) The genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–30
Bonin A, Bellemain E, Eidesen B, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Taberlet P (2004) How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies. Mol Ecol 13:3261–3273
Coart E, Van Glabeke S, Petit RJ, Van Bockstaele E, Roldán-Ruiz I (2005) Range wide versus local patterns of genetic diversity in hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) Conserv Genet 6:259–273
Cozzolino S, Widmer A (2005) Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends Ecol Evol 20:487–494
Cozzolino S, Noce ME, Musacchio A, Widmer A (2003) Variation at chloroplast minisatellite locus reveals the signature of habitat fragmentation and genetic bottlenecks in the rare orchid Anacamptis palustris (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 90:1681–1687
Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242
Ferdy JB, Gouyon PH, Moret J, Godelle B (1998) Pollinator behavior and deceptive pollination: learning process and floral evolution. Am Nat 152:696–705
Fischer M, Matthies D (1998) RAPD variation in relation to population size and plant fitness in the rare Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae). Am J Bot 85:811–819
Gram WK, Sork VL (2001) Association between environmental and genetic heterogeneity in forest tree populations. Ecology 82:2012–2021
Honnay O, Jacquemyn H (2007) Susceptibility of common and rare plants to the genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation. Conserv Biol 21:823–831
Huff DR, Peakall R, Smouse PE (1993) RAPD variation within and among populations of outcrossing buffalograss (Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engel). Theor Appl Genet 86:927–934
Hutchison DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the genetic distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53:1898–1914
Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Hermy M, Willems JH (2005) Does nectar reward affect rarity and extinction probabilities of orchid species? An assessment using historical records from Belgium and the Netherlands. Biol Conserv 121:257–263
Jacquemyn H, Vandepitte K, Brys R, Honnay O, Roldán-Ruiz I (2007) Fitness variation and genetic diversity of small, remnant populations of the food deceptive orchid Orchis purpurea. Biol Conserv 139:203–210
Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Honnay O, Hermy M (2008) Effects of coppicing on demographic structure, fruit and seed set in Orchis mascula. Basic Appl Ecol (in press). doi:10.1016/j.baae.2007.05.002
Johnson SD, Nilsson LA (1999) Pollen carryover, geitonogamy, and the evolution of deceptive pollination systems. Ecology 80:2607–2619
Johnson SD, Craig PI, Ågren J (2004) The effects of nectar addition on pollen removal and geitonogamy in the non-rewarding orchid Anacamptis morio. Proc Roy Soc London B 271:803–809
Keller LF, Waller DM (2002) Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol Evol 17:230–241
Koizumi I, Yamamoto S, Maekawa K (2006) Decomposed pairwise regression analysis of genetic and geographic distances reveals a metapopulation structure of stream-dwelling Dolly Varden charr. Mol Ecol 15:3175–3189
Kreutz CAJ, Dekker H (2000) De orchideeën van Nederland – ecologie, verspreiding, bedreiging, beheer. Uitgave Kreutz and Seckel, Landgraaf & Raalte
Kull T, Hutchings MJ (2006) A comparative analysis of decline in the distribution ranges of orchid species in Estonia and the United Kingdom. Biol Conserv 129:31–39
Lynch M, Milligan BG (1994) Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3:91–99
Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
Mitchell PL, Woodward FI (1988) Responses of three woodland herbs to reduced photosynthetically active radiation and low red to far-red ratio in shade. J Ecol 76:807–825
Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10
Nilsson LA (1983) Anthecology of Orchis mascula (Orchidaceae). Nord J Bot 3:157–179
Nybom H, Bartish IV (2000) Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3:93–114
Peakall R, Beattie AJ (1996) Ecological and genetic consequences of pollination by sexual deception in the orchid Caladenia tentaculata. Evolution 50:2207–2220
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295
Peterken GF (1991) Managing semi-natural woods: a suitable case for coppice. Quart J Forest 85:21–29
Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844–855
Rackham O (1980) Ancient woodland, its history, vegetation and uses in England. Arnold, London
Rasmussen HN (1995) Terrestrial orchids: from seed to mycotrophic plant. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Roldán-Ruiz I, Dendauw J, Van Bockstaele E, Depicker A, De Loose M (2000) AFLP markers reveal high polymorphism rates in ryegrasses (Lolium spp.). Mol Breed 6:125–134
Shefferson RP, Kull T, Tali K (2005) Adult whole-plant dormancy induced by stress in long-lived orchids. Ecology 86:3099–3104
Slatkin M (1993) Isolation by distance in equilibrium and non-equilibrium populations. Evolution 47:264–279
Smithson A (2002) The consequences of rewardlessness in orchids: reward-supplementation experiments with Anacamptis morio (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 89:1579–1587
Tremblay RL, Ackerman JD (2003) The genetic structure of orchid populations and its evolutionary consequences. Lanksteriana 7:87–92
Vekemans X, Beauwens T, Lemaire M, Roldán-Ruiz I (2002) Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size. Mol Ecol 11:139–151
Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Vandelee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414
Widmer A, Lexer C (2001) Glacial refugia: sanctuaries for allelic richness, but not for gene diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 16:267–269
Willems JH, Balounová Z, Kindlmann P (2001) The effect of shading on seed production and plant survival in the threatened species Spiranthes spiralis (Orchidaceae). Lindleyana 16:31–37
Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413–418
Zhivotovsky LA (1999) Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Mol Ecol 8:907–913
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Nancy Mergan for providing excellent technical assistance for the generation of AFLP data. Two anonymous reviewers provided very useful comments that improved significantly the quality of this ms. This research was funded by the Flemish Fund Scientific Research (FWO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jacquemyn, H., Brys, R., Adriaens, D. et al. Effects of population size and forest management on genetic diversity and structure of the tuberous orchid Orchis mascula . Conserv Genet 10, 161–168 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9543-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-008-9543-z