Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular analysis of hybridisation between wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) in Portugal: implications for conservation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endangered European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) is represented, today, by fragmented and declining populations whose genetic integrity is considered to be seriously threatened by crossbreeding with widespread free-ranging domestic cats. Extensive and recent hybridisation has been described in Hungary and Scotland, in contrast with rare introgression of domestic alleles in Italy and Germany. In Portugal, the wildcat is now listed as VULNERABLE in the Red Book of Portuguese Vertebrates. Nevertheless, genetic diversity of populations and the eventual interbreeding with domestic cats remain poorly studied. We surveyed genetic variation at 12 autosomal microsatellites for 34 wild and 64 domestic cats collected across Portugal. Wild and domestic cats were significantly differentiated both at allele frequencies and sizes (F ST=0.11, R ST = 0.18, P < 0.001). Population structure and admixture analyses performed using Bayesian approaches also showed evidence of two discrete groups clustering wild and domestic populations. Results did not show significant genetic divergence among Northern, Central and Southern wildcats. Six morphologically identified wildcats were significantly assigned to the domestic cluster, revealing some discrepancy between phenotypic and genetic identifications. We detected four hybrids (approximately 14%) using a consensus analysis of different Bayesian model-based software. These hybrids were identified throughout all sampled areas, suggesting that hybridisation is of major concern for the appropriate implementation of wildcat conservation strategies in Portugal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229

    Google Scholar 

  • Barilani M, Sfougaris A, Giannakopoulos A, Mucci N, Tabarroni C, Randi E (2006) Detecting introgressive hybridisation in rock partridge populations (Alectoris graeca) in Greece through Bayesian admixture analyses of multilocus genotypes. Conserv Genet. DOI: 10.1007/s10592-006-9174-1

  • Beaumont M, Barratt EM, Gottelli D, Ktchener AC, Daniels MJ, Pritchard JK, Bruford MW (2001) Genetic diversity and introgression in the Scottish wildcat. Mol Ecol 10:319–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belkhir K, Borsout P, Goudet J, Chikhi L, Bonhomme F (1996–2004) Genetix, logiciel sous Windows™ pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome et Population, CNRS UPR 9060, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France

  • Daniels MJ, Balharry D, Hirst D, Kitchener AC, Aspinall RJ (1998) Morphological and pelage characteristics of wild living cats in Scotland: implications for defining the ‘wildcat’. J Zool 244:231–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels MJ, Beaumont MA, Johnson PJ, Balharry D, Macdonald DW, Barratt E (2001) Ecology and genetics of wild-living cats in the north-east of Scotland and the implications for the conservation of the wildcat. J Appl Ecol 38:146–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert I, Hartl GB (2005) Conservation genetics of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Germany. In: Poster presentation in symposium of biology and conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris). Germany, January 21st–23rd 2005

  • Excoffier L, Simouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitocondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1:47–50

  • Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard J (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes M (1996) Estudo genético do gato-bravo europeu: abordagem ao problema da hibridação. Dissertação de mestrado em Conservação da Diversidade Animal. Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal

  • Ferreira PJ, Pereira I, Marques JT, Grilo C, Baltazar C, Santos-Reis M (2005) Modelling wild cat (Felis silvestris) distribution in a Portuguese Natura 2000 Site (SPA Moura Barrancos, SE Portugal). In: Poster presentation in symposium of biology and conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris). Germany, January 21st–23rd 2005

  • Gil-Sánchez JM, Valenzuela G, Sánchez JF (1999) Iberian wild cat Felis silvestris tartessia predation on rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus: functional response and age selection. Acta Theriol 44:421–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html

  • Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard AL, McOrist S, Jones TW, Boid R, Scott R, Easterbee N (1992) Is survival of European wildcats in Britain threatened by interbreeding with domestic cats? Biol Conserv 61:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecis R, Pierpaoli M, Birò S, Szemethy L, Ragni B, Vercillo F, Randi E (2006) Bayesian analyses of admixture in wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) using linked microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol 15:119–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozano J, Virgos E, Malo A, Huertas DL, Casanovas JG (2003) Importance of scrub-pastureland mosaics on wildliving cats occurrence in a Mediterranean area: implications for the conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris). Biodivers Conserv 12(5):921–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McOrist S, Kitchener AC (1996) Current threats to the European wildcat in Scotland. Biol Conserv 76(2):212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennoti-Raymond MA, O´Brien S (1995) Evolutionary conservation of ten microssatellites loci in four species of FELIDAE. J Hered 86:319–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Menotti-Raymond MA, David VA, Lyons LA et al (1999) A genetic linkage map of microsatellite in the domestic cat (Felis catus). Genomics 57:9–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monterroso P, Sarmento P, Ferreras P, Alves PC (2005) Spacial distribution of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Vale do Guadiana Natural Park, South Portugal. In: Poster presentation in symposium of biology and conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris). Germany, January 21st–23rd 2005

  • Nielsen EE, Bach LA, Kotlicki P (2006) Hybridlab (version 1.0): a program for generating simulated hybrids from population samples. Mol Ecol Notes 6(4):971–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell K, Jackson P (1996) The wild cats: status survey and conservation action plan. International Union for Nature Conservation/Cat Specialist Group, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierpaoli M, Birò ZS, Herrmann M, Hupe K, Fernandes M, Ragni B, Szemethy L, Randi E (2003) Genetic distinction of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Europe, and hybridization with domestic cats in Hungary. Mol Ecol 12:2585–2598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pires AE, Fernandes ML (2003) Last lynxes in Portugal? Molecular approaches in a pre-extinction scenario. Conserv Genet 4:525–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J, Wen W (2003) Documentation for structure software: version 2. Department of Human genetics, University of Chicago, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ragni B (1993) The crucial problem of in vivo identification of wildcat and recognition of hybrids with domestic cats. Institute of Zoology, Peruglia University, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragni B, Possenti M (1996) Variability of coat-colour and markings system in Felis silvestris. Ital J Zool 63:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randi E, Ragni B (1991) Genetic variability and biochemical systematics of domestic and wild cat populations (Felis silvestris: FELIDAE). J Mammol 72(1):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randi E, Pierpaoli M, Beaumont M, Ragni B (2001) Genetic identification of wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids using Bayesian Clustering Methods. Mol Biol Evol 18(9):1679–1693

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook E, Fritsch F, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbour Press, Cold Spring Harbour, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmento P (1996) Feeding ecology of the European wildcat Felis silvestris in Portugal. Acta Theriol 41:409–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauenberg P (1977) La stature du Chat forestiere Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777, et la variabilité morphologique de l’espèce. Rev Suisse Zool 84:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl P, Artois M (1994) Status and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Europe and around the Mediterranean rim. Convention on the conservation of European wildlife and natural habitats standing committee. Council of Europe Nature and Environment Series 69, pp 1–76

  • Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vähä JPK, Primmer CR (2006) Detecting hybridization between individuals of closely related populations – a simulation study to assess the efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods to detect hybrid individuals. Mol Ecol 15:63–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GA, Rannala B (2003) Bayesian inference of recent migration rates using multilocus genotypes. Genetics 163:1177–1191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf DE, Takebayashi N, Riesberg LH (2001) Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conserv Biol 15:1039–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Armando Loureiro from BTVS-ICN (Wild Animal Tissue Bank, Portuguese Conservation Institute), Pedro Monterroso and Dra Maria Antonieta Ferreira for providing samples. We also thank to all veterinarians and biologists that assisted in sample collection. We are grateful to Massimo Pierpaoli for helpful comments on data analysis. Rita Oliveira is supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through a PhD grant SFRH/BD/24361/2005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oliveira, R., Godinho, R., Randi, E. et al. Molecular analysis of hybridisation between wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) in Portugal: implications for conservation. Conserv Genet 9, 1–11 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9297-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9297-z

Keywords

Navigation