Abstract
Anthropogenic global warming will lead to changes in the global hydrological cycle. The uncertainty in precipitation sensitivity per 1 K of global warming across coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) has been actively examined. On the other hand, the uncertainty in precipitation sensitivity in different emission scenarios of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and aerosols has received little attention. Here we show a robust emission-scenario dependency (ESD); smaller global precipitation sensitivities occur in higher GHG and aerosol emission scenarios. Although previous studies have applied this ESD to the multi-AOGCM mean, our surprising finding is that current AOGCMs all have the common ESD in the same direction. Different aerosol emissions lead to this ESD. The implications of the ESD of precipitation sensitivity extend far beyond climate analyses. As we show, the ESD potentially propagates into considerable biases in impact assessments of the hydrological cycle via a widely used technique, so-called pattern scaling. Since pattern scaling is essential to conducting parallel analyses across climate, impact, adaptation and mitigation scenarios in the next report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, more attention should be paid to the ESD of precipitation sensitivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Allan RP, Soden BJ (2007) Large discrepancy between observed and simulated precipitation trends in the ascending and descending branches of the tropical circulation. Geophys Res Lett 34:L18705. doi:10.1029/2007GL031460
Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419:224–232
Boer GJ (1993) Climate change and the regulation of the surface moisture and energy budgets. Clim Dyn 8:225–239
Cox P, Stephenson D (2007) A changing climate for prediction. Science 317:207–208
Hanasaki N et al (2008) An integrated model for the assessment of global water resources – part 1: model description and input meteorological forcing. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:1007–1025
Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (1997) Radiative forcing and climate response. J Geophys Res 102:6831–6864
Hansen J et al (2005) Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res 110:D18104. doi:10.1029/2005JD005776
Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699
Hibbard KA, Meehl GA, Cox PM, Friedlingstein P (2007) A strategy for climate change stabilization experiments. EOS 88:217–219
Hulme M et al (2000) Using a climate scenario generator for vulnerability and adaptation assessments: MAGICC and SCENGEN version 2.4 workbook. Climatic Research Unit
Huntingford C, Cox PM (2000) An analogue model to derive additional climate change scenarios from existing GCM simulations. Clim Dyn 16:575–586
Knutson TR, Manabe S (1995) Time-mean response over the tropical Pacific to increased CO2 in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J Clim 8:2181–2199
Lambert FH, Allen MR (2009) Are changes in global precipitation constrained by the tropospheric energy budget? J Clim 22:499–517
Liepert BG, Previdi M (2009) Do models and observations disagree on the rainfall response to global warming? J Clim 22:3156–3166
Liepert BG, Feichter J, Lohmann U, Roeckner E (2004) Can aerosols spin down the water cycle in a warmer and moister world? Geophys Res Lett 31:L06207. doi:10.1029/2003GL019060
Lohmann U, Feichter J (2005) Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. Atmos Chem Phys 5:715–737
Meehl GA et al (2007a) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S et al (ed) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–845
Meehl GA et al (2007b) THE WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1383–1394
Mitchell TD (2003) Pattern scaling. An examination of the accuracy of the technique for describing future climates. Clim Change 60:217–242
Mitchell JFB, Johns TC, Eagles M, Ingram WJ, Davis RA (1999) Towards the construction of climate change scenarios. Clim Change 41:547–581
Moss R et al (2008) Towards new scenarios for analysis of emissions, climate change, impacts, and response strategies. http://www.ipcc.ch/meetings/session28/doc8.pdf
Nakicenovic N et al (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios, summary for policy makers. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Switzerland
Ramanathan V, Carmichael G (2008) Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nature Geoscience 1:221–227
Ramanathan V, Crutzen PJ, Kiehl JT, Rosenfeld D (2001) Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle. Science 294:2119–2124
Richter I, Xie SP (2008) Muted precipitation increase in global warming simulations: a surface evaporation perspective. J Geophys Res 113:D24118. doi:10.1029/2008JD010561
Roeckner E et al (1999) Transient climate change simulations with a coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM including the tropospheric sulfur cycle. J Clim 12:3004–3032
Ruosteenoja K, Tuomenvirta H, Jylhä K (2007) GCM-based regional temperature and precipitation change estimates for Europe under four SRES scenarios applying a super-ensemble pattern-scaling method. Clim Change 81:193–208
Santer BD, Wigley TML, Schlesinger ME, Mitchell JFB (1990) Developing climate scenarios from equilibrium GCM results. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Report No 47
Schlesinger ME et al (1997) Geographical scenarios of greenhouse-gas and anthropogenic-sulfate-aerosol induced climate changes. Report of the Climate Research Group, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sugi M, Yoshimura J (2004) Mechanism of tropical precipitation change due to CO2 increase. J Clim 17:238–243
Takahashi K, Matsuoka Y, Harasawa H (1998) Impacts of climate change on water resources, crop production and natural ecosystem in the Asia and Pacific region. J Global Environ Eng 4:91–103
Vecchi GA, Soden BJ (2007) Global warming and the weakening of the tropical circulation. J Clim 20:4316–4340
Wentz FJ, Ricciardulli L, Hilburn K, Mears C (2007) How much more rain will global warming bring. Science 317:233–235
Yang F, Kumar A, Schlesinger ME, Wang W (2003) Intensity of hydrological cycles in warmer climates. J Clim 16:2419–2423
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shiogama, H., Hanasaki, N., Masutomi, Y. et al. Emission scenario dependencies in climate change assessments of the hydrological cycle. Climatic Change 99, 321–329 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9765-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9765-1