Skip to main content
Log in

Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach

An editorial comment

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Baker JM, Ochsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis TJ (2007) Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—what do we really know? Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt J, Cowie A (2009) Biochar, greenhouse gas accounting and emissions trading. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaunt J, Lehmann J (2008) Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Environ Sci Technol 42:4152–4158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Beerling D, Berner R, Masson-Delmotte V, Pagani M, Raymo M, Royer DL, Zachos JC (2008) Target atmospheric CO2: where should humanity aim? The Open Atmosph Sci J 2:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2005) IPCC: special report: carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Frolking S, Butterbach-Bahl K (2005) Carbon sequestration in arable soils is likely to increase nitrous oxide emissions, offsetting reductions in climate radiative forcing. Clim Change 72:321–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manley J, van Kooten GC, Moeltner K, Johnson DW (2004) Creating carbon offsets in agriculture through no-till cultivation: a meta-analysis of costs and carbon benefits. Clim Change 68:41–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negrón JF, Bentz BJ, Fettig CJ, Gillette N, Hansen EM, Hayes JL, Kelsey RG, Lundquist JE, Lynch AM, Progar RA, Seybold SJ (2008) Research in the Western United States: looking toward the future. J For 106:325–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein L (2009) Replacing coal with wood: sustainable, eco-neutral, conservation harvest of natural tree-fall in olrd-growth forests: an editorial essay. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9625-z

  • Ornstein L, Aleinov I, Rind D (2009) Irrigated afforestation of the Sahara and Australian outback to end global warming. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9626-y

  • Page SE, Siegert F, Rieley JO, Boehm HDV, Jaya A, Limin S (2002) The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997. Nature 420:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger W (1999) Carbon sequestration in soils. Science 284:2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S (2009) The worst-case scenario. Nature 458:1104–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T-H (2008) Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Plattner GK, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. PNAS 106:1704–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kooten GC, Eagle AJ, Manley J, Smolak T (2004) How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks. Environ Sci Policy 7:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng N (2008) Carbon sequestration via wood burial. Carbon Balance Manage 3:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Lehmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, J. Biological carbon sequestration must and can be a win-win approach. Climatic Change 97, 459–463 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9695-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9695-y

Keywords

Navigation