Abstract
Hypertrophic scar (HS) is a kind of fibroproliferative disorder with gross and inordinate fiber bundles twisted in the deep scar and it often occurs after deep dermal injury. In this paper, bacterial cellulose (BC), a good candidate for wound dressing, was modified with a stripe pattern by a simple static culture method using patterned PDMS templates in order to investigate the inhibition of cicatricial contractions. The obtained patterned bacterial celluloses (pBC) with different sizes were characterized by optical microscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy. Different nanofiber structures were observed in bulges and depressions, indicating different cell behaviors on the pBC. In vitro experiments demonstrated that L929 cells showed a clear stripe distribution. Moreover, pBC had an obvious inhibitory effect on L929 cells proliferation, especially pBC with 10 μm stripes which was close to the size of the cells. Furthermore, in vivo experiments of injury model demonstrated that pBC effectively inhibited inflammatory response, reduced accumulation of fibroblasts, and significantly decreased the scar contraction compared to the control and standard groups, indicating its good HS inhibition effect. Compared with that for unmodified BC, the scar thickness for the pBC wound dressing significantly decreased from 428.7 ± 61.9 to 261.5 ± 89.6 µm, which was at least two times less than that of the standard and blank control groups. Excitingly, it was found that if the width of the stripes matched the size of the cell, the pBC had better anti-scar effect, which can also be extended to other dressings.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ (2004) Image processing with image. J Biophoton Int 11:36–42
Atiyeh BS (2007) Nonsurgical management of hypertrophic scars: evidence-based therapies, standard practices, and emerging methods. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:468–492
Bäckdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Risberg B, Gatenholm P (2006) Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 27:2141–2149
Bottan S, Robotti F, Jayathissa P, Hegglin A, Bahamonde N, Heredia-Guerrero JA, Bayer IS, Scarpellini A, Merker H, Lindenblatt N, Poulikakos D, Ferrari A (2014) Surface-structured bacterial cellulose with guided assembly-based biolithography (GAB). ACS Nano 9:206–219
Chang WS, Chen HH (2016) Physical properties of bacterial cellulose composites for wound dressings. Food Hydrocolloid 53:75–83
Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, Brown RM Jr (2007) The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 8:1–12
Damanik FFR, Rothuizen TC, van Blitterswijk CA, Rotmans JI, Moroni L (2014) Towards an in vitro model mimicking the foreign body response: tailoring the surface properties of biomaterials to modulate extracellular matrix. Sci Rep 4:6325
Dent EW, Gertler FB (2003) Cytoskeletal dynamics and transport in growth cone motility and axon guidance. Neuron 40:209–227
Di Z, Shi Z, Ullah MW, Li S, Yang G (2017) A transparent wound dressing based on bacterial cellulose whisker and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Int J Biol Macromol 105:638–644
Dunn L, Prosser HCG, Tan JTM, Vanags LZ, Ng MKC, Bursill CA (2013) Murine model of wound healing. J Vis Exp 75:e50265
Fedarko NS, Pacocha SE, Huang SK (2000) Interleukin-13 modulates collagen homeostasis in human skin and keloid fibroblasts. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 292:988–994
Friedl P (2004) Prespecification and plasticity: shifting mechanisms of cell migration. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16:14–23
Fu L, Zhang J, Yang G (2013) Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym 92:1432–1442
Geisel N, Clasohm J, Shi X, Lamboni L, Yang J, Mattern K, Yang G, Schäfer KH, Saumeret M (2016) Microstructured multilevel bacterial cellulose allows the guided growth of neural stem cells. Small 12:5407–5413
Ghayempour S, Montazer M, Rad MM (2016) Encapsulation of aloe vera extract into natural tragacanth gum as a novel green wound healing product. Int J Biol Macromol 93:344–349
Goodman SL, Sims PA, Albrecht RM (1996) Three-dimensional extracellular matrix textured biomaterials. Biomaterials 17:2087–2095
Huang C, Murphy GF, Akaishi S, Ogawa R (2013) Keloids and hypertrophic scars: update and future directions. Plast Reconstr Surg 1:e25
Huang Y, Zhu C, Yang J, Nie Y, Chen C, Sun D (2014) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 21:1–30
Hynes RO (2009) The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science 326:1216–1219
Jorfi M, Foster EJ (2015) Recent advances in nanocellulose for biomedical applications. J Appl Polym Sci 132:41719
Khalid A, Khan R, Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Wahid F (2017) Bacterial cellulose–zinc oxide nanocomposites as a novel dressing system for burn wounds. Carbohydr Polym 164:214–221
Koçer G, Ter Schiphorst J, Hendrikx M, Kassa HG, Leclère P, Schenning AP, Jonkheijm P (2017) Light-responsive hierarchically structured liquid crystal polymer networks for harnessing cell adhesion and migration. Adv Mater 29:1606407–1606414
Kolind K, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Lovmand J, Pedersen FS, Foss M, Besenbacher FA (2010) Combinatorial screening of human fibroblast responses on micro-structured surfaces. Biomaterials 31:9182–9191
Kubow KE, Vukmirovic R, Zhe L, Klotzsch E, Smith ML, Gourdon D, Luna S, Vogel V (2015) Mechanical forces regulate the interactions of fibronectin and collagen I in extracellular matrix. Nat Commun 6:8026
Le BQ, Vasilevich A, Vermeulen S, Hulshof F, Stamatialis DF, van Blitterswijk CA, de Boer J (2017) Micro-topographies promote late chondrogenic differentiation markers in the ATDC5 cell line. Tissue Eng Part A 23:458–469
Li J, Cha R, Mou K, Zhao X, Long K, Luo H, Zhou F, Jiang X (2018) Nanocellulose-based antibacterial materials. Adv Healthc Mater 7:e1800334
Liu Y, Li Y, Li N, Teng W, Wang M, Zhang Y, Xiao Z (2016) TGF-β1 promotes scar fibroblasts proliferation and transdifferentiation via up-regulating microRNA-21. Sci Rep 6:32231
Ma B, Huang Y, Zhu C, Chen C, Chen X, Fan M, Sun D (2016) Novel Cu@SiO2/bacterial cellulose nanofibers: preparation and excellent performance in antibacterial activity. Mater Sci Eng C 62:656–661
Murphy WL, McDevitt TC, Engler AJ (2014) Materials as stem cell regulators. Nat Mater 13:547–557
Nedelec B, Ghahary A, Scott PG, Tredget EE (2000) Control of wound contraction, basic and clinical features. Hand Clin 16:289–302
Nikkhah M, Edalat F, Manoucheri S, Khademhosseini A (2012) Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell-substrate interface. Biomaterials 33:5230–5246
Powell HM, Supp DM, Boyce ST (2008) Influence of electrospun collagen on wound contraction of engineered skin substitutes. Biomaterials 29:834–843
Putra A, Kakugo A, Furukawa H, Gong JP, Osada Y, Uemura T, Yamamoto M (2008) Production of bacterial cellulose with well oriented fibril on PDMS substrate. Polym J 40:137–142
Rahman MM, Netravali AN (2016) Aligned bacterial cellulose arrays as “green” nanofibers for composite materials. ACS Macro Lett 5:1070–1074
Rørth P (2011) Whence directionality: guidance mechanisms in solitary and collective cell migration. Dev Cell 20:9–18
Rosales AM, Anseth KS (2016) The design of reversible hydrogels to capture extracellular matrix dynamics. Nat Rev Mater 1:15012
Shibata Y, Tanimoto Y (2015) A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part I: surface optimization for rapid osseointegration. J Prosthodont Res 59:20–33
Stevens MM, George JH (2005) Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 310:1135–1138
Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Ullah MW, Khan S, Park JK (2014) Synthesis of regenerated bacterial cellulose–zinc oxide nanocomposite films for biomedical applications. Cellulose 21:433–447
Ullah H, Wahid F, Santos HA, Khan T (2016) Advances in biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of functional bacterial cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 150:330–352
Van der Veer WM, Bloemen MCT, Ulrich MMW, Molema G, van Zuijlen PP, Middelkoop E, Niessen FB (2009) Potential cellular and molecular causes of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns 35:15–29
Wolf K, Müller R, Borgmann S, Bröcker EB, Friedl P (2003) Amoeboid shape change and contact guidance: T-lymphocyte crawling through fibrillar collagen is independent of matrix remodeling by MMPs and other proteases. Blood 102:3262–3269
Wu CN, Fuh SC, Lin SP, Lin YY, Chen HY, Liu JM, Cheng KC (2018) TEMPO-oxidized bacterial cellulose pellicle with silver nanoparticles for wound dressing. Biomacromolecules 19:544–554
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51573024 and 51703078), the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology (Grant Nos. 17411952800 and 18441904500), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, M., Chen, W., Li, Z. et al. Patterned bacterial cellulose wound dressing for hypertrophic scar inhibition behavior. Cellulose 25, 6705–6717 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2041-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2041-7