Abstract
Effect of cationic surfactants alkyltrimethylammonium bromide (CnTAB) with varied alkyl chain lengths on the enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel and the surface charge of cellulase was investigated. Enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel increased linearly from 42.1 to 61.4 % with the increase of the concentration of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (C16TAB) logarithmically from 0.0001 to 0.01 mM, and reached a maximum value at the concentration of 0.01–0.03 mM. When the concentration was increased further, the cellulase solution became positively charged and the enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel decreased rapidly. With the increasing alkyl chain length, CnTAB provided more proton and neutralized the negative charge of cellulase more obviously. Therefore, the required concentration of CnTAB could be less to enhance the enzymatic hydrolysis of Avicel. In addition, C16TAB could enhance enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of corncob at high solid content from 35.0 to 56.3 %; C16TAB could reduce about 60 % of the cellulase loading in the enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob to obtain the same glucose yield. Effect of C16TAB on the enzymatic hydrolysis of typical pretreated softwood and hardwood was also investigated. This study laid the foundation for using CnTAB to recover cellulase, and provided the design direction for cellulase with higher activity and better stability by adjusting its hydrophilicity and chargeability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CnTAB:
-
Alkyltrimethylammonium bromide
- C10TAB:
-
Decyltrimethylammonium bromide
- C12TAB:
-
Dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide
- C14TAB:
-
Tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide
- C16TAB:
-
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide
- MP:
-
Masson pine
- EW:
-
Eucalyptus wood
- DA:
-
Dilute acid pretreatment
- SPORL:
-
Sulfite pretreatment to overcome the recalcitrance of lignocelluloses
- CTec2:
-
Commercial cellulase enzyme Cellic CTec2
References
Asgher M, Ahmad Z, Iqbal HMN (2013) Alkali and enzymatic delignification of sugarcane bagasse to expose cellulose polymers for saccharification and bio-ethanol production. Ind Crop Prod 44:488–495. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.005
Balhorn R, Gledhill BL, Wyrobek AJ (1977) Mouse sperm chromatin proteins: quantitative isolation and partial characterization. Biochemistry 16:4074–4080. doi:10.1021/bi00637a021
Börjesson J, Peterson R, Tjerneld F (2007) Enhanced enzymatic conversion of softwood lignocellulose by poly(ethylene glycol) addition. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:754–762. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.06.006
Bornscheuer U, Buchholz K, Seibel J (2014) Enzymatic degradation of (Ligno)cellulose. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:2–20. doi:10.1002/anie.201309953
Cai C, Qiu XQ, Lin XL, Lou HM, Pang YX, Yang DJ, Chen SW, Cai KF (2016) Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates with pre-hydrolysates by adding cetyltrimethylammonium bromide to neutralize lignosulfonate. Bioresour Technol 216:968–975. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.043
Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F (2002) Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 31:353–364. doi:10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00134-5
Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD (2007) Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315:804–807. doi:10.1126/science.1137016
Iqbal HMN, Kyazze G, Keshavarz T (2013) Advances in the valorization of lignocellulosic materials by biotechnology: an overview. Bioresources 8:3157–3176
Jorgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C (2007) Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuel Bioprod Bior 1:119–134. doi:10.1002/bbb.4
Knutsen J, Davis R (2004) Cellulase retention and sugar removal by membrane ultrafiltration during lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 114:585–599. doi:10.1385/ABAB:114:1-3:585
Knutsen JS, Liberatore MW (2010) Rheology modification and enzyme kinetics of high solids cellulosic slurries. Energy Fuels 24:3267–3274. doi:10.1021/ef100140g
Lan TQ, Lou HM, Zhu JY (2012) Enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses should be conducted at elevated ph 5.2-6.2. Bioenerg Res 6:476–485. doi:10.1007/s12155-012-9273-4
Li Y, Qi B, Luo J, Wan Y (2016) Effect of alkali lignins with different molecular weights from alkali pretreated rice straw hydrolyzate on enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 200:272–278. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.038
Lin XL, Qiu XQ, Lou HM, Li ZH, Zhan NX, Huang JH, Pang YX (2016) Enhancement of lignosulfonate-based polyoxyethylene ether on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocelluloses. Ind Crop Prod 80:86–92. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.11.024
Lou HM, Zhu JY, Lan TQ, Lai HR, Qiu XQ (2013) pH-Induced lignin surface modification to reduce nonspecific cellulase binding and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Chemsuschem 6:919–927. doi:10.1002/cssc.201200859
Mackenzie KJ, Francis MB (2012) Recyclable thermoresponsive Polymer-cellulase bioconjugates for biomass depolymerization. J Am Chem Soc 135:293–300. doi:10.1021/ja309277v
Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN (1999) Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15:804–816. doi:10.1021/bp9900864
Monschein M, Reisinger C, Nidetzky B (2014) Dissecting the effect of chemical additives on the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw. Bioresour Technol 169:713–722. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.054
Murray M, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:4321–4326. doi:10.1093/nar/8.19.4321
Ooshima H, Sakata M, Harano Y (1986) Enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by surfactant. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:1727–1734. doi:10.1002/bit.260281117
Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hagerdal B (2000) Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74:25–33. doi:10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00161-3
Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–489. doi:10.1126/science.1114736
Rahikainen JL, Martin-Sampedro R, Heikkinen H, Rovio S, Marjamaa K, Tamminen T, Rojas OJ, Kruus K (2013) Inhibitory effect of lignin during cellulose bioconversion: the effect of lignin chemistry on non-productive enzyme adsorption. Bioresour Technol 133:270–278. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.075
Tomanee P, Hsu JT, Ito Y (2004) Fractionation of protein, RNA, and plasmid DNA in centrifugal precipitation chromatography using cationic surfactant CTAB containing inorganic salts NaCl and NH4Cl. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:52–59. doi:10.1002/bit.20203
Wang ZJ, Zhu JY, Fu YH, Qin MH, Shao ZY, Jiang JG, Yang F (2013) Lignosulfonate-mediated cellulase adsorption: enhanced enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulose through weakening nonproductive binding to lignin. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:156. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-156
Wood TM, Bhat KM (1988) Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods Enzymol 160:87–112
Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B, Ladisch M (2010) Inhibition of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microbial Technology 46:170–176. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.11.001
Yang Q, Pan XJ (2016) Correlation between lignin physicochemical properties and inhibition to enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 113:1213–1224. doi:10.1002/bit.25903
Yu Z, Gwak KS, Treasure T, Jameel H, Chang HM, Park S (2014) Effect of lignin chemistry on the enzymatic hydrolysis of woody biomass. Chemsuschem 7:1942–1950. doi:10.1002/cssc.201400042
Zhang TX, Liu HZ, Chen JY (2000) Extraction of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase using reversed micelles formed with CTAB. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 75:798–802. doi:10.1002/1097-4660(200009)75:9<798:AID-JCTB282>3.0.CO;2-P
Zhou Y, Chen HM, Qi F, Zhao XB, Liu DH (2015) Non-ionic surfactants do not consistently improve the enzymatic hydrolysis of pure cellulose. Bioresour Technol 182:136–143. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.137
Zhu JY, Pan XJ (2010) Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour Technol 101:4992–5002. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.007
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21376100, 21676109), and Guangdong Province Science and Technology Plan (2013B051000011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, X., Cai, C., Lou, H. et al. Effect of cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide on the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Cellulose 24, 61–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1089-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1089-5