Abstract
Previous studies of calculated diffraction patterns for cellulose crystallites suggest that distortions that arise once models have been subjected to molecular dynamics (MD) simulation are the result of both microfibril twisting and changes in unit cell dimensions induced by the empirical force field; to date, it has not been possible to separate the individual contributions of these effects. To provide a better understanding of how twisting manifests in diffraction data, the present study demonstrates a method for generating twisted and linear cellulose structures that can be compared without the bias of dimensional changes, allowing assessment of the impact of twisting alone. Analysis of unit cell dimensions, microfibril volume, hydrogen bond patterns, glycosidic torsion angles, and hydroxymethyl group orientations confirmed that the twisted and linear structures collected with this method were internally consistent, and theoretical powder diffraction patterns for the two were shown to be effectively indistinguishable. These results indicate that differences between calculated patterns for the crystal coordinates and twisted structures from MD simulation can result entirely from changes in unit cell dimensions, and not from microfibril twisting. Although powder diffraction patterns for models in the 81-chain size regime were shown to be unaffected by twisting, suggesting that a modest degree of twist is not inconsistent with available crystallographic data, it may be that other diffraction techniques are capable of detecting this structural difference. Until such time as definitive experimental evidence comes to light, the results of this study suggest that both twisted and linear microfibrils may represent an appropriate model for cellulose Iβ.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balaeff A (2013) Mol_Volume. http://wwwksuiucedu/Development/MDTools/molvolume/
Berendsen HJC, Vanderspoel D, Vandrunen R (1995) Gromacs—a message-passing parallel molecular-dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91(1–3):43–56
Bu LT, Beckham GT, Crowley MF, Chang CH, Matthews JF, Bomble YJ, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Nimlos MR (2009) The energy landscape for the interaction of the family 1 carbohydrate-binding module and the cellulose surface is altered by hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds. J Phys Chem B 113(31):10994–11002
Case DA, Macke TJ, Svrcek-Seiler WA, Brown RA, Kolossváry I, Bomble YJ, Anandakrishnan R, Zhang W, Hou T, Schafmeister C, Ross WS, Wang J, Wolf RM, Cheatham TE III, Tsui V, Pitera JW, Gohlke H, Tanner S, Absgarten E, Roe DR, Frybarger P, Wang J, Cai Q, Ye X, Hsieh MJ, Tan C, Luo R, Walker RC, Crowley MF, Brozell S, Giese T, Götz AW, Lee TS, Williamson M, Luchko T, Gusarov S, Kovalenko A, Cerutti DS, Swails J, McGee TD Jr, Miller B III, Peters M, Ayers K, Wollacott A, Williams DE, Roberts BP, Merz KM Jr, Betz R (2012) AmberTools 12. University of California, San Francisco
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L (1993) Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log (N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys 98:10089
Glass DC, Moritsugu K, Cheng XL, Smith JC (2012) REACH coarse-grained simulation of a cellulose fiber. Biomacromolecules 13(9):2634–2644
Hadden JA, French AD, Woods RJ (2013) Unraveling cellulose microfibrils: a twisted tale. Biopolymers 99(10):746–756
Hanley SJ, Revol JF, Godbout L, Gray DG (1997) Atomic force microscopy and transmission electron microscopy of cellulose from Micrasterias denticulata; evidence for a chiral helical microfibril twist. Cellulose 4(3):209–220
Hess B, Bekker H, Berendsen HJC, Fraaije J (1997) LINCS: a linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J Comput Chem 18(12):1463–1472
Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4(3):435–447
Hirai A, Tsuji M, Horii F (1998) Helical sense of ribbon assemblies and splayed microfibrils of bacterial cellulose. Senri Gakkai shi 54(10):506–510
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79(2):926–935
Kirschner KN, Yongye AB, Tschampel SM, Gonzalez-Outeirino J, Daniels CR, Foley BL, Woods RJ (2008) GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. Carbohydrates. J Comput Chem 29(4):622–655
Macrae CF, Bruno IJ, Chisholm JA, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Rodriguez-Monge L, Taylor R, van de Streek J, Wood PA (2008) Mercury CSD 2.0—new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J Appl Crystallogr 41:466–470
Matthews JF, Skopec CE, Mason PE, Zuccato P, Torget RW, Sugiyama J, Himmel ME, Brady JW (2006) Computer simulation studies of microcrystalline cellulose I beta. Carbohydr Res 341(1):138–152
Matthews JF, Bergenstrahle M, Beckham GT, Himmel ME, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Crowley MF (2011) High-temperature behavior of cellulose I. J Phys Chem B 115(10):2155–2166
Matthews JF, Beckham GT, Bergenstrahle-Wohlert M, Brady JW, Himmel ME, Crowley MF (2012) Comparison of cellulose I beta simulations with three carbohydrate force fields. J Chem Theory Comput 8(2):735–748
Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose 1 beta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124(31):9074–9082
Nishiyama Y, Johnson GP, French AD (2012) Diffraction from nonperiodic models of cellulose crystals. Cellulose 19(2):319–336
Paavilainen S, Rog T, Vattulainen I (2011) Analysis of twisting of cellulose nanofibrils in atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 115(14):3747–3755
van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark AE, Berendsen HJC (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible and free. J Comp Chem 26:1701–1718
Wehle M, Vilotijevic I, Lipowsky R, Seeberger PH, Varon Silva D, Santer M (2012) Mechanical compressibility of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol(GPI) anchor backbone by independent glycosidic linkages. J Am Chem Soc 134(46):18964–18972
Wojdyr M (2012) Debyer. http://wwwunipresswawpl/debyer, http://codegooglecom/p/debyer/wiki/debyer
Yui T, Nishimura S, Akiba S, Hayashi S (2006) Swelling behavior of the cellulose I beta crystal models by molecular dynamics. Carbohydr Res 341(15):2521–2530
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Cotton, Inc. for support of this work, as well as the National Institutes for Health (GM094919 (EUREKA)) and the Science Foundation of Ireland (08/IN.1/B2070).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hadden, J.A., French, A.D. & Woods, R.J. Effect of microfibril twisting on theoretical powder diffraction patterns of cellulose Iβ. Cellulose 21, 879–884 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0051-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0051-z