Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Summary of findings from the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI): corn stover pretreatment

  • Published:
Cellulose Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation, with members from Auburn University, Dartmouth College, Michigan State University, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Purdue University, Texas A&M University, the University of British Columbia, and the University of California at Riverside, has developed comparative data on the conversion of corn stover to sugars by several leading pretreatment technologies. These technologies include ammonia fiber expansion pretreatment, ammonia recycle percolation pretreatment, dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment, flowthrough pretreatment (hot water or dilute acid), lime pretreatment, controlled pH hot water pretreatment, and sulfur dioxide steam explosion pretreatment. Over the course of two separate USDA- and DOE-funded projects, these pretreatment technologies were applied to two different corn stover batches, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids from each pretreatment technology using identical enzyme preparations, enzyme loadings, and enzymatic hydrolysis assays. Identical analytical methods and a consistent material balance methodology were employed to develop comparative sugar yield data for each pretreatment and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis. Although there were differences in the profiles of sugar release, with the more acidic pretreatments releasing more xylose directly in the pretreatment step than the alkaline pretreatments, the overall glucose and xylose yields (monomers + oligomers) from combined pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis process steps were very similar for all of these leading pretreatment technologies. Some of the water-only and alkaline pretreatment technologies resulted in significant amounts of residual xylose oligomers still remaining after enzymatic hydrolysis that may require specialized enzyme preparations to fully convert xylose oligomers to monomers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dowe N, McMillan J (2008) SSF experimental protocols-lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis and fermentation-laboratory analytical procedure (LAP), National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42630

  • Eggeman T, Elander R (2005) Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2019–2025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu TA (1996) Pretreatment of biomass. In: Wyman CE (ed) Handbook on bioethanol, production and utilization. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp 179–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DK, Elander RT (2007) Pretreatments for enhanced digestibility of feedstocks. In: Himmel ME (ed) Biomass recalcitrance. Blackwell, London, pp 436–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Holtzapple MT (2005) Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1994–2006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim T, Lee Y (2005) Pretreatment and fractionation of corn stover by ammonia recycle percolation process. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2007–2013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Wyman CE (2005) Partial flow of compressed-hot water through corn stover to enhance hemicellulose sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1978–1985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd TA, Wyman CE (2005) Total sugar yields for pretreatment by hemicellulose hydrolysis coupled with enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1967–1977

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan JD (1994) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Himmel ME, Baker JO, Overend RP (eds) Enzymatic conversion of biomass for fuels production. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 292–324

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch M (2005a) Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1986–1993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosier N, Wyman CE, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005b) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96(6):673–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NREL (2008) National Renewable Energy Laboratory Standard Biomass Analytical Procedures, http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html

  • Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE (2005) Optimization of the ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) treatment parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2014–2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J (1999) Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: a tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotechnol Prog 15:794–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman CE (2007) What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol 25(4):153–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M, Lee Y (2005a) Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1959–1966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY (2005b) Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2026–2032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY, Mitchinson C, Saddler JN (2009) Comparative sugar recovery and fermentation data following pretreatment of poplar wood by leading technologies. Biotechnol Prog 25(2):333–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the Unites States Department of Agriculture Initiative for Future Agricultural and Food Systems Program (contract number 00-52104-9663) and the United States Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program (contract number DE-FG36-04GO14017) for funding the collaborative research projects of the CAFI team. In addition, support by Natural Resources Canada allowed participation by the University of British Columbia in the second CAFI project. The authors also recognize Tim Eggeman of Neoterics International, who (via contract with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory) has provided the process engineering and economic analysis expertise in support of all CAFI projects to date. We also wish to recognize the true collaborative spirit of the CAFI team that makes such projects possible and pleasurable and thank the many undergraduate and graduate students, post doctoral candidates, technicians, and others on the CAFI Team for their vital role in developing this information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard T. Elander.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elander, R.T., Dale, B.E., Holtzapple, M. et al. Summary of findings from the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI): corn stover pretreatment. Cellulose 16, 649–659 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9308-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9308-y

Keywords

Navigation