Abstract
The Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation, with members from Auburn University, Dartmouth College, Michigan State University, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Purdue University, Texas A&M University, the University of British Columbia, and the University of California at Riverside, has developed comparative data on the conversion of corn stover to sugars by several leading pretreatment technologies. These technologies include ammonia fiber expansion pretreatment, ammonia recycle percolation pretreatment, dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment, flowthrough pretreatment (hot water or dilute acid), lime pretreatment, controlled pH hot water pretreatment, and sulfur dioxide steam explosion pretreatment. Over the course of two separate USDA- and DOE-funded projects, these pretreatment technologies were applied to two different corn stover batches, followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids from each pretreatment technology using identical enzyme preparations, enzyme loadings, and enzymatic hydrolysis assays. Identical analytical methods and a consistent material balance methodology were employed to develop comparative sugar yield data for each pretreatment and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis. Although there were differences in the profiles of sugar release, with the more acidic pretreatments releasing more xylose directly in the pretreatment step than the alkaline pretreatments, the overall glucose and xylose yields (monomers + oligomers) from combined pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis process steps were very similar for all of these leading pretreatment technologies. Some of the water-only and alkaline pretreatment technologies resulted in significant amounts of residual xylose oligomers still remaining after enzymatic hydrolysis that may require specialized enzyme preparations to fully convert xylose oligomers to monomers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dowe N, McMillan J (2008) SSF experimental protocols-lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis and fermentation-laboratory analytical procedure (LAP), National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42630
Eggeman T, Elander R (2005) Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2019–2025
Hsu TA (1996) Pretreatment of biomass. In: Wyman CE (ed) Handbook on bioethanol, production and utilization. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp 179–212
Johnson DK, Elander RT (2007) Pretreatments for enhanced digestibility of feedstocks. In: Himmel ME (ed) Biomass recalcitrance. Blackwell, London, pp 436–453
Kim S, Holtzapple MT (2005) Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1994–2006
Kim T, Lee Y (2005) Pretreatment and fractionation of corn stover by ammonia recycle percolation process. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2007–2013
Liu C, Wyman CE (2005) Partial flow of compressed-hot water through corn stover to enhance hemicellulose sugar recovery and enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1978–1985
Lloyd TA, Wyman CE (2005) Total sugar yields for pretreatment by hemicellulose hydrolysis coupled with enzymatic hydrolysis of the remaining solids. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1967–1977
McMillan JD (1994) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In: Himmel ME, Baker JO, Overend RP (eds) Enzymatic conversion of biomass for fuels production. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 292–324
Mosier N, Hendrickson R, Ho N, Sedlak M, Ladisch M (2005a) Optimization of pH controlled liquid hot water pretreatment of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1986–1993
Mosier N, Wyman CE, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005b) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96(6):673–686
NREL (2008) National Renewable Energy Laboratory Standard Biomass Analytical Procedures, http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html
Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, Dale BE (2005) Optimization of the ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) treatment parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2014–2018
Wooley R, Ruth M, Glassner D, Sheehan J (1999) Process design and costing of bioethanol technology: a tool for determining the status and direction of research and development. Biotechnol Prog 15:794–803
Wyman CE (2007) What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol 25(4):153–157
Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M, Lee Y (2005a) Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour Technol 96(18):1959–1966
Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY (2005b) Comparative sugar recovery data from laboratory scale application of leading pretreatment technologies to corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96(18):2026–2032
Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY, Mitchinson C, Saddler JN (2009) Comparative sugar recovery and fermentation data following pretreatment of poplar wood by leading technologies. Biotechnol Prog 25(2):333–339
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the Unites States Department of Agriculture Initiative for Future Agricultural and Food Systems Program (contract number 00-52104-9663) and the United States Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program (contract number DE-FG36-04GO14017) for funding the collaborative research projects of the CAFI team. In addition, support by Natural Resources Canada allowed participation by the University of British Columbia in the second CAFI project. The authors also recognize Tim Eggeman of Neoterics International, who (via contract with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory) has provided the process engineering and economic analysis expertise in support of all CAFI projects to date. We also wish to recognize the true collaborative spirit of the CAFI team that makes such projects possible and pleasurable and thank the many undergraduate and graduate students, post doctoral candidates, technicians, and others on the CAFI Team for their vital role in developing this information.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elander, R.T., Dale, B.E., Holtzapple, M. et al. Summary of findings from the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI): corn stover pretreatment. Cellulose 16, 649–659 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9308-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9308-y