Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Technology to Improve Education

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child & Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The primary purpose of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is to ensure free appropriate public education for individuals with disabilities in the least restrictive environment. The statute also mandates student’s access and services for students’ access to devices and technology as part of the individual education program. Along with the advancement of technology in the past few decades, the use of high-tech devices has gained attention from educators. However, the statute only ensures the use of these technology devices for students with special needs as assistive technology.

Methods

A discussion of the history and current regulations related to special education was provided focusing on the IDEA and the Assistive Technology Act of 1988 as amended. Additionally, articles related recent movement in education to support evidence-based practices were reviewed. In particular, the author evaluated No Child Left Behind (NCLB), Every Student Succeed Act (ESSA), the establishment of What Works Clearinghouse (WWC), and the increasing use of technology.

Conclusion

The Universal Design for Learning (UDL) takes a completely different stance in the use of technology. This model places an emphasis on educators being proactive and flexible in order to teach students with diverse needs. The author contends that technology should be incorporated throughout the classroom regardless of pre-existing assumption of educational services, thereby assuring that all students can be instructed with necessary accommodations. The author argues the immediate needs of policy and system changes to improve overall education services for all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avner, A. (1980). Active external control: A basis for superiority of CBI. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 6(4), 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bausch, M. E., Mittler, J. E., Hasselbring, T. S., & Cross, D. P. (2005). The Assistive Technology Act of 2004: What does it say and what does it mean? Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 23, 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichard, J. A., Coleman, R., & Langdon, P. (2007). Does my stigma look big in this? Considering acceptability and desirability in the inclusive design of technology products. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 622–631). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Binder, C. (1993). Behavioral fluency: A new paradigm. Educational Technology, 33, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, C., & Watkins, C. L. (1990). Precision teaching and direct instruction: Measurably superior instructional technology in schools. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 3(4), 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (2001). The picture exchange communication system. Behavior Modification, 25(5), 725–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bostow, D. E., Kritch, K. M., & Tompkins, B. F. (1995). Computers and pedagogy: Replacing telling with interactive computer-programmed instruction. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27(2), 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, R. A., Blumberg, S. J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., et al. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127(6), 1034–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Harris, A. A., & Wakemanxya, S. (2008). A meta-analysis on teaching mathematics to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 407–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. Board of Education. (1954). 377 U.S. 483.

  • Califano, J. A. (2007). Governing America. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, P. H., Milbourne, S., Dugan, L. M., & Wilcox, M. J. (2006). A review of evidence on practices for teaching young children to use assistive technology devices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, K. A., Reeve, S. A., Reeve, K. F., & DeBar, R. M. (2013). Using activity schedules on the iPod touch to teach leisure skills to children with autism. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(2), 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Universal Design. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm.

  • Chan, J. M., Lambdin, L., Graham, K., Fragale, C., & Davis, T. (2014). A picture-based activity schedule intervention to teach adults with mild intellectual disability to use an iPad during a leisure activity. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23(2), 247–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. S., Ewing, C. B., & Mozzoni, M. P. (2005). Precision teaching and fluency training across cognitive, physical, and academic tasks in children with traumatic brain injury: a multiple baseline study. Behavioral Interventions, 20(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2012). Improved lesson planning with universal design for learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, B. R., Jones, M., Mace, R., Mueller, J., Mullick, A., Ostroff, E., et al. (1997). The principles of universal design. Retrieved May, 25, 2015.

  • Courtney-Long, E., Carrroll, D. D., Zang, Q. C., Stevens, A. C., Griffin-Blake, S., Armour, B. S., et al. (2015). Prevalence of disability and disability type among adults—United States, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(29), 777–783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • Durand, V. M. (1999). Functional communication training using assistive devices: Recruiting natural communities of reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32(3), 247–267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn, D. L. (2004). Rethinking assistive technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 5(4), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn, D. L. (2010). Would you recognize universal design for learning if you saw it? Ten propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edyburn, D. L., & Gardner, J. E. (1999). Integrating technology into special education teacher preparation programs: Creating shared visions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(2), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, W., Lee, C., von Schrader, S. (2014). Disability statistics from the 2012 American Community Survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI). Retrieved May 30, 2015 from www.disabilitystatistics.org.

  • Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95, In 114th Congress.

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.

  • Green, G. (2001). Behavior analytic instruction for learners with autism advances in stimulus control technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(2), 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M. (1981). Social skills training with handicapped children: A review. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 139–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2001). Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, D. L., Whatley, A. D., Ayres, K. M., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Effectiveness of video modeling to teach iPod use to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(4), 525–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselbring, T. S., & Glaser, C. H. W. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. The Future of Children, 10(2), 102–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Headsprout® [web-based program]. Retrieved from https://www.headsprout.com/.

  • Kagohara, D. M. (2011). Three students with developmental disabilities learn to operate an iPod to access age-appropriate entertainment video. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagohara, D. M., Sigafoos, J., Achmadi, D., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. (2012). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorders to check the spelling of words. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 304–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Mulloy, A., et al. (2010). Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9(5), 328–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., et al. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 147–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koegel, L. K., Koegel, R. L., Hurley, C., & Frea, W. D. (1992). Improving social skills and disruptive behavior in children with autism through self-management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 341–353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., et al. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. What works clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.

  • Kravits, T. R., Kamps, D. M., Kemmerer, K., & Potucek, J. (2002). Brief report: Increasing communication skills for an elementary-aged student with autism using the picture exchange communication system. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(3), 225–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kubina, R. M., & Wolfe, P. (2005). Potential applications of behavioral fluency for students with autism. Exceptionality, 13, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorah, E. R., Tincani, M., Dodge, J., Gilroy, S., Hickey, A., & Hantula, D. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad™ as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25(6), 637–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R. (1997). What is universal design? The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. Retrieved May, 25, 2015.

  • Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2000). Universal design for individual differences. Educational Leadership, 58(3), 39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenbroek, J. F., & de Bruin, R. (2006). Anthropometry of a friendly restroom. Assistive Technology, 18(2), 196–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nepo, K., Tincani, M., Axelrod, S., & Meszaros, L. (2015). iPod touch® to increase functional communication of adults with autism spectrum disorder and significant intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. doi:10.1177/1088357615612752.

  • Parette, P., & Scherer, M. (2004). Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39(3), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 343 F. Supp. 279 (1972).

  • Ramdoss, S., Lang, R., Mulloy, A., Franco, J., O’Reilly, M., Didden, R., et al. (2011). Use of computer-based interventions to teach communication skills to children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(1), 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raz-Kids® [web-based program]. Retrieved from https://www.raz-kids.com/.

  • READ 180® [web-based program]. Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/read180/.

  • Read Naturally® [computer software]. http://www.readnaturally.com/.

  • Rose, D. (2001). Universal Design for Learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(2), 66–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use implications for pre-service and in-service teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Retrieved Dec 5, 2016, from http://www2.gsu.edu/~wwwche/Milken%20report.pdf.

  • Schuerholz, L. J., Harris, E. L., Baumgardner, T. L., Reiss, A. L., Freund, L. S., Church, R. P., et al. (1995). An analysis of two discrepancy-based models and a processing-deficit approach in identifying learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(1), 18–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T. M., & Shearer-Lingo, A. (2002). The effects of reading fluency instruction on the academic and behavioral success of middle school students in a self-contained EBD classroom. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 46(4), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla-Mehta, S., Miller, T., & Callahan, K. J. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of video instruction on social and communication skills training for children with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer-Dudek, J., & Greer, R. D. (2010). A long-term analysis of the relationship between fluency and the training and maintenance of complex math skills. The Psychological Record, 55(3), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Higher Education Opportunity Act (Public Law 110-315). Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/leg/hea08/index.html.

  • The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2001). Public Law 107–110.

  • Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of learning disabilities, 34(1), 33–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Smith, S. J., Palmer, S. B., & Davies, D. K. (2004). Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski, S. M., Trammell, B., & Clarke, L. S. (2013). Improving employment outcomes among adolescents and adults on the autism spectrum. Psychology in the Schools, 50(9), 876–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winzer, M. A. (2007). Confronting difference: An excursion through the history of special education. In L. Florian (Ed.), The Sage handbook of special education (pp. 21–33), London: Sage

  • Woodward, J., & Rieth, H. (1997). A historical review of technology research in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no external funding for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Temple University, 503 S. Old Middletown Road, Media, PA, 19063, USA

    Kaori Nepo

Authors
  1. Kaori Nepo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaori Nepo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author, Kaori Nepo, did not receive any external funding for this project. Thus, she declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals or human participants performed by the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nepo, K. The Use of Technology to Improve Education. Child Youth Care Forum 46, 207–221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9386-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9386-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation