Abstract
SYNTAX Score II (SSII) connects clinical variables with coronary anatomy. We investigated the prognostic value of SSII in patients with ST segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated the in-hospital prognostic impact of SSII on 492 patients with STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with PPCI. Patients were stratified by tertiles of SSII, in-hospital clinical outcomes were compared between those groups. In-hospital univariate analysis revealed higher rates of in-hospital death for patients with SSII in tertile 3, as compared to patients with SSII in tertile 1 (OR 17.4, 95% CI 10.0–30.2, p < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding baseline variables, SSII in tertile 3 was associated with 6.2-fold hazard of in-hospital death (OR 6.2, 95% CI 2.6–14.1, p < 0.001). SSII in patients with STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with PPCI provide an independent prognostic marker of in-hospital outcomes. Our data suggests SSII to be a simple, feasible and clinically applicable tool for rapid risk stratification in patients with STEMI complicated with cardiogenic shock treated with PPCI.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thiele H, Zeymer U, NeumannF J, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Böhm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K (2012) for the IABP-SHOCK II Trial Investigators Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367:1287–1296
Islam MS, Panduranga P, Al-Mukhaini M, Al-Riyami A, El-Deeb M, Rahman SA, Al-Riyami MB (2016) In-hospital outcome of patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: results from royal hospital percutaneous coronary intervention registry, Oman. Oman Med J 31(1):46–51
Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 31(20):2501–2555
Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(24):e44–122
Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR Jr, Mack M, Feldman T, Morice MC, Stahle E, Onuma Y, Morel MA, Garcia-Garcia HM, van Es GA, Dawkins KD, Mohr FW, PW Serruys (2013) Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of syntax score ii. The Lancet 381:639–650
Kurniawan E, Ding FH, Zhang Q, Yang ZK, Hu J, Shen WF, Zhang RY (2016) Predictive value of SYNTAX score II for clinical outcomes in octogenarian undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Geriatr Cardiol 13(9):733–739
He J, Zhao H, Yu X, Li Q, Lv S, Chen F, Jiang T SYNTAXScore (2017) SYNTAX Score-II predicts long-term mortality in patients who underwent left mainpercutaneous coronary intervention treated with second-generation drug-eluting stents. Int Heart J 58(3):344–350
Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I (1989) Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two dimensional echocardiography. American Society of echocardiography committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358–367
Oh JK, Hagler DJ, Cabalka A, Reeder GS, Cetta F Jr, Seward JB (2006) Transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography. In: Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ (eds) The echomanual, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 29–58
Cockcroft DW, Gault MH (1976) Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41
Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA (2003) The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 24:881–882
Serruys PW, Unger F, Sousa JE et al (2001) Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 344:1117–1124
Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A, Dawkins K, van den Brand M, Van Dyck N, Russell ME, Mohr FW, Serruys PW (2005) The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1(2):219–227
Velásquez-Rodríguez J, Diez-Delhoyo F, Valero-Masa MJ, Vicent L, Devesa C, Sousa-Casasnovas I, Juárez M, Angulo-Llanos R, Fernández-Avilés F, Martínez-Sellés M (2017) Prognostic impact of age and hemoglobin in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with reperfusion therapy. Am J Cardiol 119: (12):1909–1916
Perelshtein Brezinov O, Klempfner R, Zekry SB, Goldenberg I, Kuperstein R (2017) Prognostic value of ejection fraction in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: a real world study. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(9):e6226
Valente S, Lazzeri C, Vecchio S, Giglioli C, Margheri M, Bernardo P, Comeglio M, Chiocchini S, Gensini GF (2007) Predictors of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock. Int J Cardiol 114(2):176–182
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Research involving human and animal participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayıroğlu, M.İ., Keskin, M., Uzun, A.O. et al. Predictive value of SYNTAX score II for clinical outcomes in cardiogenic shock underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention; a pilot study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34, 329–336 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1241-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1241-9