References
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112(15):2318–2323
Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110(17):2638–2643
Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R (2007) New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 115(11):1464–1480
Hussman L, Gaemperli O, Schepis T et al. Accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography with computed tomography and its dependency on plaque composition. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. doi:10.1007/s10554-008-9327-z
Swallow RA, Court IA, Calver AL et al (2006) The limitations of coronary angiography: identification of a critical coronary stenosis using intravascular ultrasound. Int J Cardiol 106(1):123–125
Al-Fahoum AS (2003) Adaptive edge localisation approach for quantitative coronary analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 41(4):425–431
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nicol, E.D., Stirrup, J. & Underwood, S.R. CT coronary angiography: the continuing challenges of validating and optimizing a new and rapidly developing technique. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24, 905–906 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9348-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9348-7