Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Citizenship, length of stay, and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women, 2000–2010

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Two factors jointly account for significant gaps in access to health care among immigrants who are present in the U.S.—legal status, and length of residence. The objective of this study is to examine the association between citizenship and length of residence in the U.S. and cancer screening (breast, cervical, and colorectal) among women.

Methods

We analyzed 11 years (2000–2010) of consolidated data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey linked with the National Health Interview Survey. Multivariate analyses compared cancer screening among U.S.-born citizens (n = 58,484), immigrant citizens (n = 8,404), and immigrant non-citizens (n = 6,564).

Results

Immigrant non-citizens living in the U.S. for less than 5 years were less likely to receive guideline-concordant breast (OR = 0.68 [0.53–0.88]), cervical (OR = 0.65 [0.54–0.78]), and colorectal (OR = 0.31 [0.19–0.50]) cancer screening compared to U.S.-born citizens. Immigrant citizens and non-citizens living in the U.S. for 5 years or more had higher odds of being screened for breast and cervical cancer compared to U.S.-born citizens; (OR = 1.26 [1.13–1.41] and OR = 1.17 [1.06–1.29]) for immigrant citizens, (OR = 1.28 [1.13–1.45] and OR = 1.23 [1.09–1.38]) for non-citizens. Immigrant non-citizens living in the U.S. for 5 years or more had lower odds of being screened for colorectal cancer compared to U.S.-born citizens (OR = 0.76 [0.65–0.90]).

Conclusions

Based on these findings, duration mandates in immigration policy may indirectly influence future pathways to preventive health care and cancer disparities disproportionately affecting immigrant women. We suggest that limits of duration mandates be reevaluated, as they may offer pathways to preventive health care for this vulnerable population, and prevent future cancer disparities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lawfully present individuals eligible under the affordable care act (2016) Los Angeles. https://www.nilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/lawfully-present-imm-categories-ACA-2016-07.pdf

  2. Callahan ST, Hickson GB, Cooper WO (2006) Health care access of Hispanic young adults in the United States. J Adolesc Health 39(5):627–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrasquillo O, Carrasquillo AI, Shea S (2000) Health insurance coverage of immigrants living in the United States: differences by citizenship status and country of origin. Am J Public Health 90(6):917–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldman DP, Smith JP, Sood N (2005) Legal status and health insurance among immigrants. Health Aff 24(6):1640–1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ku L, Matani S (2001) Left out: immigrants’ access to health care and insurance. Health Aff 20(1):247–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reyes AM, Miranda PY (2014) Trends in cancer screening by citizenship and health insurance, 2000–2010. J Immigr Minor Health

  7. Abraido-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Florez KR (2005) Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation? Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med 61(6):1243–1255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Goel MS, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS, Wee CC (2004) Obesity among US immigrant subgroups by duration of residence. JAMA 292(23):2860–2867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Himmelgreen DA, Perez-Escamilla R, Martinez D et al (2004) The longer you stay, the bigger you get: Length of time and language use in the US are associated with obesity in Puerto Rican women. Am J Phys Anthropol 125(1):90–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Newsom JT, McFarland BH (2004) The, association between length of residence and obesity among Hispanic immigrants. Am J Prev Med 27(4):323–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park Y, Neckerman KM, Quinn J, Weiss C, Rundle A (2008) Place of birth, duration of residence, neighborhood immigrant composition and body mass index in New York City. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ 5

  12. Singh GK, Siahpush M (2002) Ethnic-immigrant differentials in health behaviors, morbidity, and cause-specific mortality in the United States: an analysis of two national data bases. Hum Biol 74(1):83–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh GK, Hiatt RA (2006) Trends and disparities in socioeconomic and behavioural characteristics, life expectancy, and cause-specific mortality of native-born and foreign-born populations in the United States, 1979–2003. Int J Epidemiol 35(4):903–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Echeverria SE, Carrasquillo O (2006) The roles of citizenship status, acculturation, and health insurance in breast and cervical cancer screening among immigrant women. Med Care 44(8):788–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miranda PY, Tarraf W, Gonzalez P, Johnson-Jennings M, Gonzalez HM (2012) Breast cancer screening trends in the United States and ethnicity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 21(2):351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Alba I, Hubbell FA, McMullin JM, Sweningson JM, Saitz R (2005) Impact of US citizenship status on cancer screening among immigrant women. J Gen Intern Med 20(3):290–296

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Key facts about the uninsured population (2015) The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation (ed). Menlo Park, CA. http://kff.org/uninsured/fact-sheet/key-facts-about-the-uninsured-population/

  18. MEPS-HC response rates by panel (2009) Agency for Healthcare Research, Rockville, MD. https://meps.ahrq.gov/survey_comp/hc_response_rate.jsp

  19. Chowdhury S, Machlin S, Wun L (2012) Linking medical expenditure panel survey to the national health interview survey: weighting and estimation. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No. 12005

  20. Cohen SB (2004) Integrated survey designs: a framework for nonresponse bias reduction through the linkage of surveys. Administrative and Secondary Data: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Working Paper No. 04001

  21. Ezatti-Rice TM, Rohde F, Greenblatt J. Sample design of the medical expenditure panel survey household component, 1998–2007. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

  22. Calonge N, Petitti DB, DeWitt TG, et al. (2009) Screening for breast cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 151(10):716–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Calonge N, Petitti DB, DeWitt TG, et al. (2008) Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149(9):627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BKS, Woolf SH (2002) Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the US preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 137(5):347–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moyer VA, Force USPST (2012) Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 156(12):880–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Final update summary: colorectal cancer: screening. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/colorectal-cancer-screening. Accessed Aug 12, 2016

  27. Final recommendation statement: breast cancer: screening. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/breast-cancer-screening1. Accessed Aug 12, 2016

  28. Yao NL, Hillemeier MM (2013) Disparities in mammography rate among immigrant and native-born women in the U.S.: progress and challenges. J Immigr Minor Health 16(4):613–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Miranda PY, Johnson-Jennings M, Tarraf W, Gonzalez P, Vega WA, Gonzalez HM (2012) Using colorectal trends in the U.S. to identify unmet primary care needs of vulnerable populations. Prev Med 55(2):131–136

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Andersen R, Newman JF (1973) Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in United-States. Milbank Mem Fund Q-Health Soc 51(1):95–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Walsh J, Mahony R, Armstrong F, Ryan G, O’Herlihy C, Foley M (2011) Ethnic variation between white European women in labour outcomes in a setting in which the management of labour is standardised-a healthy migrant effect? BJOG 118(6):713–718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubalcava LN, Teruel GM, Thomas D, Goldman N (2008) The healthy migrant effect: new findings from the Mexican family life survey. Am J Public Health 98(1):78–84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Abraido-Lanza AF, Dohrenwend BP, Ng-Mak DS, Turner JB (1999) The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the “salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypotheses. Am J Public Health 89(10):1543–1548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Janevic T, Savitz DA, Janevic M (2011) Maternal education and adverse birth outcomes among immigrant women to the United States from Eastern Europe: A test of the healthy migrant hypothesis. Soc Sci Med 73(3):429–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yao N, Bradley CJ, Miranda PY (2014) Mammography Use after the 2009 debate. J Clin Oncol 32(35):4023–4024

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Urquia ML, O’Campo PJ, Heaman MI (2012) Revisiting the immigrant paradox in reproductive health: the roles of duration of residence and ethnicity. Soc Sci Med 74(10):1610–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported, in part, by Grant Nos. UL1 TR000127 and KL2 TR000126 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Penn State Social Science Research, and Penn State Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

Author contributions

Miranda conceptualized the study and methodology, supervised formal analysis, prepared initial draft; Yao conducted formal analysis, assisted in manuscript preparation; Snipes assisted in manuscript preparation; BeLue assisted in manuscript preparation; Lengerich assisted in manuscript preparation; Hillemeier assisted in manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Y. Miranda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All of the authors report no conflicts of interest.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miranda, P.Y., Yao, N., Snipes, S.A. et al. Citizenship, length of stay, and screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer in women, 2000–2010. Cancer Causes Control 28, 589–598 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0887-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0887-x

Keywords

Navigation