Abstract
Objective
To assess the impact of socio-economic status (SES) on cancer survival in the state of New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with one of 13 major cancers during 1992–2000 in NSW were followed-up to the end of 2001. The effect of SES on survival was estimated for each individual cancer and all 13 cancers combined using multivariable modeling. The numbers of lives that could be extended if all people had the same level of excess risk of death due to cancer as patients in the highest SES areas were also estimated.
Results
There were highly statistically significant variations in survival across SES groups for four cancers: stomach, liver, lung, and breast and all 13 cancers combined. Variation remained highly significant after adjusting for disease stage. Patients in lower SES areas had 10–20% higher excess risk than those in the highest SES areas. In total, there were 3,346 lives potentially extendable beyond 5 years; the highest number was for lung cancer (756).
Conclusion
The significantly worse survival in lower SES areas from cancers of the stomach, liver, lung, and breast may be due to poorer access to high-quality cancer care. Estimates of the number of lives potentially extendable by improving cancer survival in lower SES areas suggest that priority should be given to improving lung cancer care in lower SES areas in NSW, Australia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (2003) Cancer survival in Australia 1992–1997: geographic categories and socioeconomic status. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra
Coleman MP, Babb P, Sloggett A, Quinn M, De Stavola B (2001) Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales. Cancer 91:208–216. doi :10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1+<208::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-E
Dickman PW, Gibberd RW, Hakulinen T (1997) Estimating potential savings in cancer deaths by eliminating regional and social class variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 51:289–298
Halpern MT, Ward EM, Pavluck AL, Schrag NM, Bian J, Chen AY (2008) Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 9:222–231. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70032-9
Ward E, Halpern M, Schrag N et al (2008) Association of insurance with cancer care utilization and outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin 58:9–31
Hall SE, Holman CD, Wisniewski ZS, Semmens J (2005) Prostate cancer: socio-economic, geographical and private-health insurance effects on care and survival. BJU Int 95:51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05248.x
Morris M, Iacopetta B, Platell C (2007) Comparing survival outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer treated in public and private hospitals. Med J Aust 186:296–300
Yu XQ, O’Connell DL, Gibberd RW, Armstrong BK (2005) A population-based study from New South Wales, Australia 1996–2001: area variation in survival from colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:2715–2721. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.018
Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C (eds) (1990) International classification of diseases for oncology, 2nd edn. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1998) Information paper: 1996 census socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA). ABS, Canberra
Young JL Jr, Roffers SD, Ries LAG, Fritz AG, Hurlbut AA (eds) (2001) SEER summary staging manual—2000: codes and coding instructions. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al (eds) (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, Philadelphia
Berkson J, Gage RP (1950) Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin 25:270–286
Coleman M, Aylin P (eds) (2000) Death certification and mortality statistics: an international perspective. TSO, London
Percy C, Stanek E III, Gloeckler L (1981) Accuracy of cancer death certificates and its effect on cancer mortality statistics. Am J Public Health 71:242–250
Ederer F, Axtell LM, Cutler SJ (1961) The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 6:101–121
Chiang C (1968) Introduction to stochastic processes in biostatistics. Wiley, New York
Ederer F, Heise H (1959) Instructions to IMB 650 programmers in processing survival computations. Methodological note No. 10, End Results Evaluation Section. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
Brenner H, Gefeller O (1996) An alternative approach to monitoring cancer patient survival. Cancer 78:2004–2010. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<2004::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-#
Brenner H, Gefeller O (1997) Deriving more up-to-date estimates of long-term patient survival. J Clin Epidemiol 50:211–216. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00280-1
Yu X, O’Connell D, Gibberd R, Smith D, Armstrong B (2003) Cancer survival, incidence and mortality by Area Health Service in NSW 1994 to 2000. The Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney
Yu XQ, O’Connell DL, Forman D (2004) Comparison of cancer survival in UK and Australia: rates are higher in Australia for three major sites. Br J Cancer 91:1663–1665
Yu XQ, O’Connell DL, Gibberd RW, Smith DP, Dickman PW, Armstrong BK (2004) Estimating regional variation in cancer survival: a tool for improving cancer care. Cancer Causes Control 15:611–618. doi:10.1023/B:CACO.0000036165.13089.e8
Brenner H, Rachet B (2004) Hybrid analysis for up-to-date long-term survival rates in cancer registries with delayed recording of incident cases. Eur J Cancer 40:2494–2501. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.022
Dickman PW, Sloggett A, Hills M, Hakulinen T (2004) Regression models for relative survival. Stat Med 23:51–64. doi:10.1002/sim.1597
Jong KE, Smith DP, Yu XQ, O’Connell DL, Goldstein D, Armstrong BK (2004) Remoteness of residence and survival from cancer in New South Wales. Med J Aust 180:618–622
Department of Health and Aged Care (2001) Measuring remoteness: accessibility/remoteness index of Australia (ARIA). Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra
Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M et al (2007) Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995–1999: results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol 8:773–783. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70245-0
Darlow BA, Hutchinson JL, Simpson JM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Donoghue DA, Evans NJ (2005) Variation in rates of severe retinopathy of prematurity among neonatal intensive care units in the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1592–1596. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.073650
Gibberd R, Hancock S, Howley P, Richards K (2004) Using indicators to quantify the potential to improve the quality of health care. Int J Qual Health Care 16(Suppl 1):i37–i43. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzh019
Howley PP, Gibberd R (2003) Using hierarchical models to analyse clinical indicators: a comparison of the gamma-Poisson and beta-binomial models. Int J Qual Health Care 15:319–329. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg044
Simpson JM, Evans N, Gibberd RW, Heuchan AM, Henderson-Smart DJ (2003) Analysing differences in clinical outcomes between hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care 12:257–262. doi:10.1136/qhc.12.4.257
Braaten T, Weiderpass E, Kumle M, Lund E (2005) Explaining the socioeconomic variation in cancer risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2591–2597. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0345
Ekberg-Aronsson M, Nilsson PM, Nilsson JA, Pehrsson K, Lofdahl CG (2006) Socio-economic status and lung cancer risk including histologic subtyping—a longitudinal study. Lung Cancer 51:21–29. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.014
Siahpush M, Singh GK (2002) Sociodemographic variations in breast cancer screening behavior among Australian women: results from the 1995 National Health Survey. Prev Med 35:174–180. doi:10.1006/pmed.2002.1063
Subramanian SV, Chen JT, Rehkopf DH, Waterman PD, Krieger N (2006) Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: a multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989–1991. Am J Epidemiol 164:823–834. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj313
Dalton SO, Ross L, During M et al (2007) Influence of socioeconomic factors on survival after breast cancer—a nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 1983–1999. Int J Cancer 121:2524–2531. doi:10.1002/ijc.22979
Hussain SK, Altieri A, Sundquist J, Hemminki K (2008) Influence of education level on breast cancer risk and survival in Sweden between 1990 and 2004. Int J Cancer 122:165–169. doi:10.1002/ijc.23007
Hussain SK, Lenner P, Sundquist J, Hemminki K (2008) Influence of education level on cancer survival in Sweden. Ann Oncol 19:156–162. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm413
Hall S, Holman CD, Sheiner H, Hendrie D (2004) The influence of socio-economic and locational disadvantage on survival after a diagnosis of lung or breast cancer in Western Australia. J Health Serv Res Policy 9(Suppl 2):10–16. doi:10.1258/1355819042248116
Woods LM, Rachet B, Coleman MP (2006) Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review. Ann Oncol 17:5–19. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdj007
Vinod SK, Delaney GP, Bauman AE, Barton MB (2003) Lung cancer patterns of care in south western Sydney, Australia. Thorax 58:690–694. doi:10.1136/thorax.58.8.690
Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM (1993) The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 329:326–331. doi:10.1056/NEJM199307293290507
Coker AL, Du XL, Fang S, Eggleston KS (2006) Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts. Gynecol Oncol 102:278–284. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.016
Hall SE, Holman CD, Sheiner H (2004) The influence of socio-economic and locational disadvantage on patterns of surgical care for lung cancer in Western Australia 1982–2001. Aust Health Rev 27:68–79
Cartman ML, Hatfield AC, Muers MF, Peake MD, Haward RA, Forman D (2002) Lung cancer: district active treatment rates affect survival. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:424–429. doi:10.1136/jech.56.6.424
Campbell NC, Elliott AM, Sharp L, Ritchie LD, Cassidy J, Little J (2002) Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer. Br J Cancer 87:585–590. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515
Rutqvist LE, Bern A (2006) Socioeconomic gradients in clinical stage at presentation and survival among breast cancer patients in the Stockholm area 1977–1997. Int J Cancer 119:1433–1439. doi:10.1002/ijc.21949
Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G (2006) Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 119:1145–1151. doi:10.1002/ijc.21889
Chaudhry R, Goel V, Sawka C (2001) Breast cancer survival by teaching status of the initial treating hospital. CMAJ 164:183–188
Goldman DP, Smith JP (2002) Can patient self-management help explain the SES health gradient? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10929–10934. doi:10.1073/pnas.162086599
Lagerlund M, Hedin A, Sparen P, Thurfjell E, Lambe M (2000) Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program. Prev Med 31:417–428. doi:10.1006/pmed.2000.0723
Kaffashian F, Godward S, Davies T, Solomon L, McCann J, Duffy SW (2003) Socioeconomic effects on breast cancer survival: proportion attributable to stage and morphology. Br J Cancer 89:1693–1696. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601339
Yu XQ, O’Connell DL, Gibberd RW, Abrahamowicz M, Armstrong BK (2008) Misclassification of colorectal cancer stage and area variation in survival. Int J Cancer 122:398–402. doi:10.1002/ijc.23043
Acknowledgments
We thank the reviewer for providing constructive comments, which led to significant improvements in the manuscript. We also thank the NSW Central Cancer Registry for providing data for this study. Bruce Armstrong’s research is supported by a University of Sydney Medical Foundation Program Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, X.Q., O’Connell, D.L., Gibberd, R.W. et al. Assessing the impact of socio-economic status on cancer survival in New South Wales, Australia 1996–2001. Cancer Causes Control 19, 1383–1390 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9210-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9210-1