Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is Employee Technological “Ill-Being” Missing from Corporate Responsibility? The Foucauldian Ethics of Ubiquitous IT Uses in Organizations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ethical issues introduced by excessive uses of ubiquitous information technology (IT) at work have received little attention, from either practitioners or ethics scholars. This article suggests the concept of technological ill-being and explores the ethical issues arising from such ill-being, according to the individual and collective responsibilities associated with their negative effects. This article turns to the philosopher Michel Foucault and proposes a renewed approach of the relationship among IT, ethics, and responsibility, based on the concepts of practical rationality, awareness, and self-engagement. This article reports a case study of an international automotive company actively engaged in both corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ubiquitous IT deployment. Technological ill-being is an expression of the tension between an individual’s social attributes and aspirations when using modern IT and a system of norms, rules, and values imposing constraints on him or her. We identify the reasons for the lack of consideration of technological ill-being in CSR through identification of the inclusion–exclusion principle. The resulting critical, comprehensive approach to corporate responsibilities and IT uses incorporates the ethical implications of the latter, highlights the practical rationality of their relationship, and demands both individual and collective responses, through a call for collective ethical awareness and self-engagement. The findings prompt a Foucauldian ethics of IT use in organizations, which emerges in a mutually constitutive relationship between the self, as a moral subject of own actions, and broader organizational principles, in which CSR appears as a techne (i.e., a practical rationality governed by conscious aims).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.service-public.fr/particuliers/actualites/A11297.

References

  • Acquier, A., & Gond, J.-P. (2007). Aux sources de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise: (Re)lecture et analyse d‘un ouvrage fondateur: Social responsibilities of the businessman d‘Howard Bowen (1953). Finance Contrôle Stratégie,10(2), 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addas, S., & Pinsonneault, A. (2015). The many faces of IT interruptions: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of their performance effects. Information Systems Journal,25, 231–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agence France-Presse. (2016). French workers win legal right to avoid checking work email out-of-hours. Retrieved December 31, 2016 from https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/dec/31/french-workers-win-legal-right-to-avoid-checking-work-email-out-of-hours.

  • Arnold, M. (2003). On the phenomenology of technology: The “Janus-faces” of mobile phones. Information and Organization,13(4), 231–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly,35(4), 831–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology,34(1), 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science,22(4), 887–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance: A conversation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellotti, V., et al. (2005). Quality versus quantity: E-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. Human–Computer Interaction,20(1), 89–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, F. (2014). How to do a digital detox. Forbes. Retrieved June 13, 2014 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/francesbooth/2014/06/13/how-to-do-a-digital-detox/#5d6eaa9c65a4.

  • Borgman, A. (1992). Crossing the postmodern divide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1998 [1974]). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

  • Buchholz, R., & Rosenthal, S. (2002). Technology and business: Rethinking and moral dilemma. Journal of Business Ethics,41, 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkus, D. (2016). Why Atos Origin is striving to be a zero-email company. Forbes. Retrieved July 12, 2016 from https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidburkus/2016/07/12/why-atos-origin-is-striving-to-be-a-zero-email-company/#56f2fee08d0f.

  • Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies,9(2), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra, R., Khanova, J., & Ramdeen, S. (2013). Work and personal e-mail use by university employees: PIM practices across domain boundaries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,64(5), 1029–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, W. P. (1997). Suggested management responses to ethical issues raised by technological change. Journal of Business Ethics,16, 1393–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousteaux, A. S., PanKéShon, J. L., & Jacobs, A. (2010). Is ill-being gendered? Suicide, risk for suicide, depression and alcohol dependence. Revue Française de Sociologie,51, 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Knights, D., & Starkey, K. (2008). The conditions of our freedom: Foucault, organization, and ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly,18(3), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, J., Carugati, A., & Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2015). The dark side of computer-mediated control. Information Systems Journal,25(4), 319–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcy, J., Gupta, A., Tarafdar, M., & Turel, O. (2014). Reflecting on the “dark side” of information technology use. Communications of the Association for Information Systems,35(1), 109–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. W. F. (1995). Managing technology: Some ethical preliminaries. Business Ethics,4(3), 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. W. F. (1997). Technology and business ethics theory. Business Ethics: A European Perspective,6(2), 76–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., & Blomstrom, R. L. (1966). Business and its environment. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T. (1999). Business ethics and the information age. Business and Society Review,104(3), 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De George, R. T. (2000). Ethics and the challenge of the information age. Business Ethics Quarterly,10(1), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dery, K., Kolb, D., & MacCormick, J. (2014). Working with connective flow: How smartphone use is evolving in practice. European Journal of Information Systems,23, 558–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, P., & Steyaert, C. (2016). Rethinking the space of ethics in social entrepreneurship: Power, subjectivity and practices of freedom. Journal of Business Ethics,133(4), 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, B., Yuthas, K., & Dillard, J. F. (2000). It’s only words: Impacts of information technology on moral dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics,23(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research,55(7), 553–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review,14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. (1980). The ethics of non-power. In M. Kranzberg (Ed.), Ethics in an age of pervasive technology (pp. 204–212). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Factor, R., Oliver, A. L., & Montgomery, K. (2013). Beliefs about social responsibility at work: Comparisons between managers and non-managers over time and cross-nationally. Business Ethics: A European Review,22(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic. An archaeology of medical perception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208–228). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984a). Space, knowledge and power. In Paul Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 239–256). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984b). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics, subjectivity and truth (pp. 281–301). New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1985a). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1985b). The care of the self: The history of sexuality (Vol. 3). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J.-P., & Moon, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in retrospect and prospect: Exploring the life-cycle of an essentially contested concept. In J.-P. Gond & J. Moon (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: A reader (Vol. 1, pp. 1–28). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J.-P., Palazzo, G., & Basu, K. (2009). Reconsidering instrumental corporate social responsibility through the mafia metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly,19(1), 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, V. (2014). Five ways to liberate your team from email overload. Fortune,8, 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel, R. T., & Andrews, P. H. (1997). Ethical implications of technological advances on business communications. Journal of Business Communication,34(2), 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (2002). Disconnects and consequences in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly,47(3), 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S., Rhodes, K., & Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics,64, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G. (2015). Technology with no human responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics,127(4), 707–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, D. (1999). Ethics in a technological age. Business and Society Review,104(1), 57–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D., Caza, A., & Collins, P. (2012). States of connectivity: New questions and new directions. Organization Studies,33(2), 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laval, C. (2015). Du “zéro email” à la “social collaboration”. Journal du Net. Retrieved May 04, 2015 from https://www.journaldunet.com/solutions/expert/60798/du–zero-email–a-la–social-collaboration.shtml.

  • Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2011). Organizations as discursive constructions: A Foucauldian approach. Organization Studies,32(9), 1247–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Bertin, E. (2018). Who governs IT nowadays? From sovereign IT governance to liberal IT governmentality: A Foucauldian analogy. European Journal of Information Systems,27(3), 326–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2009). Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly,33(1), 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loacker, B., & Muhr, S. L. (2009). How can I become a responsible subject? Towards a practice-based ethics of responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics,90, 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, J., Dery, K., & Kolb, D. (2012). Engaged or just connected? Smartphones and employee engagement. Organizational Dynamics,41(3), 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science,5(4), 502–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, K. P. (1999). Has technology introduced new ethical problems? Journal of Business Ethics,19(1), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Some problems with employee monitoring. Journal of Business Ethics,43(4), 353–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., & Freeman, R. E. (2004). The separation of technology and ethics in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,53, 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K., Shilton, K., & Smith J. (2017). Call for papers, special issue of the Journal of Business Ethics, technology, ethics, and corporate responsibility. Retrieved from http://static.springer.com/sgw/documents/1584272/application/pdf/Special+Issue+-+Martin+et+al+Technology%2C+Ethics%2C+and+Corporate+Responsibility.pdf.

  • Mazmanian, M., Orlikowsi, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science,24(5), 1337–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1967). Understanding media: The extension of man. London: Sphere Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogburn, W. F. (1966). Social change with regard to cultural and original nature. New York: B. W. Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottensmeyer, E. J., & Heroux, M. A. (1991). Ethics, public policy, and managing advanced technologies: The case of electronic surveillance. Journal of Business Ethics,10(7), 519–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petroff, A., & Cornevin, O. (2017). France gives workers ‘right to disconnect’ from office email. Retrieved January 2, 2017 from http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/02/technology/france-office-email-workers-law/index.html.

  • Pinsonneault, A., & Rivard, S. (1998). Information technology and the nature of managerial work: From the productivity paradox to the Icarus paradox? MIS Quarterly,22, 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S., & Waeraas, A. (2016). CSR-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. Journal of Business Ethics,137(1), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 276–298). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (Ed.). (1984). The Foucault reader. Harmonsdsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research,19(4), 417–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., Morsing, M., & Moon, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility: Strategy, communication, governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Turel, O. (2015). Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of facebook users. AIS Transactions on Replication Research,1(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (2015). Le gaucher boiteux: Puissance de la pensée. Paris: Edition le Pommier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies,36(11), 1507–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C., & Hanson, K. (1985). It’s good business. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soror, A. A., Hammer, B. I., Steelman, Z. R., Davis, F. D., & Limayem, M. M. (2015). Good habits gone bad: Explaining negative consequences associated with the use of mobile phones from a dual-systems perspective. Information Systems Journal,25, 403–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soror, A. A., Steelman, Z. R., & Limayem, M. (2012). Discipline yourself before life disciplines you: Deficient self-regulation and mobile phone unregulated use. In 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 849–858).

  • Spira, J. B. (2011). Overload! How too much information is hazardous to your organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C., Chandra, S., & Shirish, A. (2015). Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Information Systems Journal,25, 355–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 134–164). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., & Hatchuel, A. (2002). The long detour: Foucault’s history of desire and pleasure. Organization,9(4), 641–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steelman, Z., Soror, A., Limayem, M., & Worrell, D. (2012). Obsessive compulsive tendencies as predictors of dangerous mobile phone usage. In AMCIS 2012 Proceedings 9. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2012/proceedings/HCIStudies/9.

  • Tarafdar, M., D’Arcy, J., Turel, O., & Gupta, A. (2015). The dark side of information technology. MIT Sloan Management Review,56(2), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar, M., Gupta, A., & Turel, O. (2013). The dark side of information technology use. Information Systems Journal,23(3), 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2014). Techno-stress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal,25(2), 103–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems,24(1), 301–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turel, O., Serenko, A., & Giles, P. (2011). Integrating technology addiction and use: An empirical investigation of online auction users. MIS Quarterly,34, 1043–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue. The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal,42(5), 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks, L. (2004). Foucault. Power/knowledge and information systems: Reconstructing the present. In J. Mingers & L. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies,43(1), 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review,16(4), 691–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IÉSEG School of Management, CNRS, Univ. Lille, LEM UMR 9221, 59000, Lille, France

    Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte

Authors
  1. Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurélie Leclercq-Vandelannoitte.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. Is Employee Technological “Ill-Being” Missing from Corporate Responsibility? The Foucauldian Ethics of Ubiquitous IT Uses in Organizations. J Bus Ethics 160, 339–361 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04202-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04202-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation