Abstract
It has long been recognized that accountants practicing in business settings have a dual role: (1) as employees, they are bound to the organization, and (2) as professionals, they are bound by the profession’s code of ethical conduct (Westra, Journal of Business Ethics 5(2): 119–128, 1986). These two roles highlight the need to recognize and consider both the ethical and economic implications of their decisions. Practicing industry accountants are commonly involved in a broad range of their firm’s business practices and decision making, and are increasingly exposed to the commercial aspects of their companies. Also, during their education, they were trained on their professional responsibilities. However, in general, this education was not recent and may not have been reinforced. By contrast, accounting students have been recently and repeatedly exposed to and have knowledge about their professional responsibilities as an accountant, but limited, if any, exposure to the commercial aspects of business. Consequently, our first hypothesis predicts that the ethical sensitivity of practicing industry accountants will be lower than that of accounting students. We find limited support for this hypothesis. Second, we also examine company reward structure and predict that ethical sensitivity will be lower for those in a company with a reward structure narrowly focused only on financial goals as compared to those in a company with a broad reward structure (e.g., including rewards for both financial and non-financial goals). Third, we predict that the difference in ethical sensitivity levels between those in a company with a narrow reward structure as compared to those in a company with a broad financial reward structure will be higher for practicing industry accountants compared to accounting students. Results from our study generally support these last two predictions. Ethical sensitivity is lower for those in a company with a reward structure narrowly focused only on financial goals as compared to those in a company with a broad reward structure, suggesting that companies may be able to increase ethical awareness in their organizations by including non-financial goals in their reward structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our experimental instrument and study were approved by the research ethics board at the institution of the researcher who facilitated the data collection and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. All experimental participants provided their informed consent and all responses are reported in the aggregate.
The presentation order for the four alternatives is randomized by method of earnings management. The use of a Latin Square design for randomization controls so that each issue is in each position at least once. This design produced four distinct orders, which were randomly distributed to participants.
The setting and dialog form are based on Hawkins (2010). The project costs option included in the case was adapted from Cohen et al. (2000) and the pension adjustment option is informed by Moehrle and Reynolds (2005). Two of the earnings management options presented in the case were adapted from the vignettes used in prior earnings management studies (Merchant and Rockness 1994).
The case dialog stressing the importance of meeting the financial targets of the firm (EPS) is kept constant over all conditions. This simulates the fact that although companies may broaden corporate goals by adding non-financial goals, pressure to meet financial goals and financial targets still remains.
All three pilot test participants have at least three years of public accounting experience and one has an additional five years of experience as a corporate accountant.
Jordan (2007) provides a detailed review of the methods of measurement for research in the field of ethical sensitivity. Prior studies of ethical sensitivity have generally presented participants with a written case and then asked them to identify the issues within the case. The identified issues are then coded as ethical or non-ethical in nature to present a score of ethical sensitivity (Shaub 1989).
Time measures were analyzed, to ensure that administration differences between participant types did not affect participants’ effort when completing the task. There was no significant difference in the time to complete the experiment between professional industry accountant and student participants. In addition, there was no significant difference in experimental dropout rates between participant types.
Evidence suggests that reporting on corporate social responsibility generates several benefits. For example, Dhaliwal et al. (2011) find that costs of equity capital tends to go down after initiating corporate social responsibility reporting. More recently, Christensen (2016) reports that firms reporting on corporate social responsibility are less likely to engage in high-profile misconduct.
“Researchers who seek to study ethical sensitivity and also use questions that include words alluding to ethics may enhance ethical sensitivity due to their questioning. It is desirable for professionals to act ethically, and participants in this setting will very likely claim that they weigh moral criteria when their choices have explicit moral overtones” (Schlachter 1990, p. 848).
Both coders are chartered accountants and have a minimum of five years of accounting experience.
Ethical considerations may be tied to financial concerns. For coding purposes, issues were recognized as ethical issues only when respondents explicitly recognized the effect of the issues on stakeholders other than themselves or the company.
The relative weightings used in the paper are consistent with those used in Swenson-Lepper (2005), in that the weighting decreases as the questions prompt ethics to a greater degree. The values used for the weighting have been moderately adjusted to allow for use of the Poisson distribution which requires whole number responses.
The number of issues identified in Level 1 was used to test the robustness of the results to alternative calculations of ethical sensitivity. Supplemental analysis, not tabulated, corroborates the main reported results.
By design, years of accounting experience is associated with participant type. As shown in Table 2, median years of accounting experience among accounting students are 0.00, and 15.0 and 13.50 for practicing industry accountants, across broad and narrow conditions of reward structure, respectively.
All three participants were accounting students. Two of the three participants were in the narrow company reward structure group and one participant was in the broad company reward structure group. The course identified was a specific accounting course with a significant segment on information ethics and the ethicality of earnings management.
Both participants were practicing industry accountants. One participant was in the narrow company reward structure group and one participant was in the broad company reward structure group.
Information regarding the geographic location of the accounting practitioners was not collected, but participants were recruited from across Canada. Due to the anonymity of respondents, the geographical distribution of respondents cannot be calculated; however, cases were distributed across a minimum of three Canadian provinces and four Canadian cities.
One practicing accountant did not have a designation, but had four years of experience as a financial accountant and one practicing accountant did not specify whether s/he held an accounting designation, but had seven years of accounting experience.
The Poisson distribution requires the mean of the distribution be equal to the variance. Over-dispersion tests of our model indicated a significant over-dispersion (P value = 0.001). To correct for the over-dispersion, we ran Quasi-Poisson models, which relax the assumptions required for the Poisson models. All presented and tabled results are based on the Quasi-Poisson models.
All independent variables have been mean adjusted for Poisson analysis.
Simple effects tests were run to corroborate this pattern of results and support H3. When separate Poisson Models (Quasi-Poisson) are run by participant type (untabulated), corporate reward structure has a significant effect on the ethical sensitivity of practicing industry accountants (SE = 0.096, P value <0.036), but no significant effect on the ethical sensitivity of accounting students (SE = 0.104, P value <0.214).
References
Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Gender differences in determining the ethical sensitivity of future accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 591–597.
American Accounting Association Committee on the Future Content, Structure and Scope of Accounting Education (The Bedford Committee). (1986). Future accounting education: Preparing for the expanded profession. Issues in Accounting Education, 1(1), 168–195.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business-International (AACSB). (2004). Ethics education in business schools: Report of the ethics education task force. Tampa, Fl; AACSB
Badertscher, B. A. (2011). Overvaluation and the choice of alternative earnings management mechanisms. The Accounting Review, 86(5), 1491–1518.
Barsky, A. (2008). Understanding the ethical cost of organizational goal-setting: A review and theory development. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 63–81.
Bartov, E., & Mohanram, P. (2004). Private information, earnings manipulations, and executive stock-option exercises. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 889–920.
Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beaudoin, C. A., Cianci, A. M., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2015). The impact of CFOs’ incentives and earnings management ethics on their financial reporting decisions: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 505–518.
Belski, W., Beams, J., & Brozovsky, J. (2008). Ethical judgments in accounting: An examination on the ethics of managed earnings. Journal of Global Business Issues, 2(2), 59–68.
Bird, F. B., & Waters, J. A. (1989). The moral muteness of managers. California Management Review, 32(1), 73–88.
Blanthorne, C., Kovar, S. E., & Fisher, D. G. (2007). Accounting educators’ opinions about ethics in the curriculum: An extensive view. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(3), 355–390.
Buckless, F. A., & Ravenscroft, S. P. (1990). Contrast coding: A refinement of ANOVA in behavioral analysis. Accounting Review, 65(4), 933–945.
Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.
Christensen, D. M. (2016). Corporate accountability reporting and high-profile misconduct. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 377–399.
Clarkeburn, H. (2002). A test for ethical sensitivity in science. Journal of Moral Education, 31(4), 439–453.
Clikeman, P. M., & Henning, S. L. (2000). The socialization of undergraduate accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 1–17.
Cohen, J., Pant, L., & Sharp, D. (1996). Measuring the ethical awareness and ethical orientation of Canadian auditors. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 98–119.
Cohen, J., Pant, L., & Sharp, D. (2000). Project earnings manipulation: An ethics case based on agency theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 89–104.
Cohen, J., Pant, L., & Sharp, D. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 319–336.
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.
Dichev, I. D., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2013). Earnings quality: Evidence from the field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 1–33.
Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 397–428.
Elias, R. Z. (2002). Determinants of earnings management ethics among accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 40, 33–45.
Erickson, M., & Wang, S. (1999). Earnings management by acquiring firms in stock for stock mergers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 27(2), 149–176.
Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (1989). A synthesis of ethical decision models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 9(2), 55–64.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: Random House.
Fleming, D. M., Lightner, S. M., & Romanus, R. N. (2009). The effect of professional context on accounting students’ moral reasoning. Issues in Accounting Education, 24(1), 13–30.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
Gaa, J. (2009). Corporate governance and the responsibility of the board of directors for strategic financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethic, 90, 179–197.
Ghaffari, F., Kyriacou, O., & Brennan, R. (2008). Exploring the implementation of ethics in U.K. accounting programs. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(2), 183–198.
Gioia, D. A. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5), 379–389.
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1–3), 3–73.
Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Greenfield, A. C., Jr., Norman, C. S., & Wier, B. (2008). The effect of ethical orientation and professional commitment on earnings management behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 419–434.
Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.
Harris, J. D., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 541–548.
Hawkins, D. F. (2010). Batson International, S.A. (A). HBS Case No. 111-023; Harvard Business School Accounting and Management Unit. Available at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1705426. Accessed 9 Nov 2010.
Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1), 85–107.
Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383.
Holthausen, R. W., Larcker, D. F., & Sloan, R. G. (1995). Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 29–74.
Jensen, M. C. (2005). Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financial Management, 34(1), 5–19.
Johnson, E. N., Fleischman, G. M., Valentine, S., & Walker, K. B. (2012). Managers’ ethical evaluations of earnings management and its consequences. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 910–927.
Jones, J., Massey, D. W., & Thorne, L. (2003). Auditors’ ethical reasoning: Insights from past research and implications for the future. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 45–103.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.
Jordan, J. (2007). Taking the first step toward a moral action: A review of moral sensitivity measurement across domains. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(3), 323–359.
Jordan, J. (2009). A social cognition framework for examining moral awareness in managers and academics. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 237–258.
Kaplan, S. E. (2001a). Ethically related judgments by observers of earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 285–298.
Kaplan, S. E. (2001b). Further evidence on the ethics of managing earnings: An examination of the ethically related judgments of shareholders and non-shareholders. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20(1), 27–44.
Kaplan, S. E., McElroy, J. C., Ravenscroft, S. P., & Shrader, C. B. (2007). Moral judgment and causal attributions: Consequences of engaging in earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 149–164.
Kaplan, S. E., & Ravenscroft, S. P. (2004). The reputation effects of earnings management in the internal labor market. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(3), 453–478.
Karcher, J. N. (1996). Auditors’ ability to discern the presence of ethical problems. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(10), 1033–1050.
Kim, J., Song, G. Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). Internal control weakness and bank loan contracting: Evidence from SOX Section 404 disclosures. The Accounting Review, 86(4), 1157–1188.
Lampe, J. C., & Finn, D. W. (1992). A model of auditors' ethical decision-processes. Auditing—A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11, 33–59.
Madison, R. L., & Schmidt, J. J. (2006). Survey of time devoted to ethics in accountancy programs in North American colleges and universities. Issues in Accounting Education, 21(2), 99–109.
Mayhew, B., & Murphy, P. (2009). The impact of ethics education on reporting behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 397–416.
Merchant, K. A., & Rockness, J. (1994). The ethics of managing earnings: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(1), 79–94.
Michels, J. (2012). Do unverifiable disclosures matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1385–1413.
Moehrle, S. R., & Reynolds, J. A. (2005). Earnings management in the context of pension accounting: A case. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 11–18.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–413.
Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 323–338.
Ponemon, L. (1992). Accountant underreporting and moral reasoning: An experimental lab study. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9, 171–189.
Ponemon, L. (1993). The influence of ethical reasoning on auditors’ perception of management’s integrity and competence. Advances in Accounting, 11, 1–29.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
Rest, J. R., Narváez, D., Bebeau, M., & Thoma, S. (1999). Post-conventional ethical thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Reynolds, S. J. (2008). Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1027–1041.
Schlachter, P. J. (1990). Organizational influences on individual ethical behavior in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(11), 839–853.
Shafer, W. E., & Wang, Z. (2011). Effects of ethical context and Machiavellianism on attitudes towards earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(5), 372–392.
Shaub, M. K. (1989). An empirical examination of the determinants of auditors’ ethical sensitivity. Ph.D. thesis. Texas Tech University at Lubbock, TX.
Shaub, M. K., Finn, D. W., & Munter, P. (1993). The effects of auditors’ ethical orientation on commitment and ethical sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 145–169.
Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. E. (1996). Ethics, experience and professional skepticism: A situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 124–157.
Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man (pp. 196–279). New York: Wiley.
Singhapakdi, A., Rao, C. P., & Vitell, S. J. (1996). Ethical decision making: An investigation of services marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 635–644.
Skinner, D. J., & Sloan, R. G. (2002). Earnings surprises, growth expectations, and stock returns or don’t let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2–3), 289–312.
Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 1022–1040.
Sparks, J. R. (2015). A social cognitive explanation of situational and individual effects on moral sensitivity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 45–54.
Sparks, J. R., & Hunt, S. D. (1998). Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 92–109.
Sprinkle, G. B., & Williamson, M. G. (2006). Experimental research in managerial accounting. Handbook of Management Accounting Research, 1, 415–444.
Swenson-Lepper, T. (2005). Ethical sensitivity for organizational communication issues: Examining individual and organizational differences. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(3), 205–231.
Taneja, S., Taneja, P., & Gupta, R. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: A review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(3), 343–364.
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(4), 223–236.
Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), 63–99.
Thorne, L. (2000). The development of context-specific measures of accountants’ ethical reasoning. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 12(1), 139–170.
Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K., & McCabe, D. (1998). The ethical context of in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.
Westra, L. S. (1986). Whose “loyal agent”? Towards an ethic of accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 5(2), 119–128.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate helpful comments and assistance from James Gaa, Kris Hoang, Karim Jamal, Ric Johnson, Keri Kettle, Theresa Libby, Michael Maier, Erin Marshall, Brad Pomeroy, Alan Webb, and Jennifer Welchman, participants at the American Accounting Association Ethics Symposium (2013); the Canadian Academic Accounting Association Annual Conference (2013); the University of Waterloo Centre for Accounting Ethics Symposium (2015); and to workshop participants at Queen’s University, the University of Alberta, the University of Calgary, the University of Lethbridge, the University of Saskatchewan, the University of Waterloo, and Wilfrid Laurier University. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and Sally Gunz and Linda Thorne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fiolleau, K., Kaplan, S.E. Recognizing Ethical Issues: An Examination of Practicing Industry Accountants and Accounting Students. J Bus Ethics 142, 259–276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3154-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3154-2