Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward Moral Responsibility Theories of Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Supply Chain

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the quest to build truly sustainable corporations and supply chains, we propose (a) the moral responsibility theory of corporate sustainability and (b) the moral responsibility theory of sustainable supply chain. Built from morality literature in philosophy, the view of corporations as moral agents in law, and analyses of corporate hypocrisy and its role in an organization’s and its members’ behaviors, our theories show how a truly sustainable corporation and its external supply chain could emerge. At the core, we believe that without a sense of moral responsibility businesses throughout the supply chain will not be truly sustainable. In today’s highly globalized and fragmented business environments, corporations do businesses with external supply chain partners, and without the truly sustainable supply chain partners, they may not be able to achieve sustainability goals. Moreover, for such a supply chain to be truly sustainable, each member of the supply chain must also be truly sustainable. For each member of the supply chain to be truly sustainable, the individuals who work in a corporation must be truly sustainable as well. That is, a truly sustainable supply chain cannot be established without its member corporations’ and employees’ commitment to and successes in sustainability. This paper shows how business moral responsibility and corporate sustainability are closely intertwined. How these theories could be applied in the corporate and supply chain settings are discussed, and future research opportunities are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Griffith, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2010). Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(5), 989–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aranzadi, J. (2013). The natural link between virtue ethics and political virtue: The morality of the market. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, S. W., & Kierzkowski, H. (Eds.). (2001). Fragmentation: New production patterns in the world economy: New production patterns in the world economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Toward a theory of supply chain management: The constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analysis review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantinescu, M., & Kaptein, M. (2015). Mutually enhancing responsibility: A theoretical exploration of the interaction mechanisms between individual and corporate moral responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, T. B. (2002). The law of private companies. London: Bloomsbury Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D., & Gilliland, S. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, J. (2013). Corporations and non-agential moral responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 30(4), 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubbink, W. (2014). A moral grounding of the duty to further justice in commercial life. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 18, 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J., & Lorsch, J. (2012, July–August). What good are shareholders? Retrieved July 28, 2014, from Harvard Business Review: http://hbr.org/2012/07/what-good-are-shareholders/ar/1.

  • French, P. (1979). The corporation as a moral person. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, P. (2000). Human resources, capabilities and sustainability. In D. Dunphy, J. Benveniste, A. Griffiths, & P. Sutton (Eds.), sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century (pp. 55–77). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha-Brookshire, J. (2015). Global sourcing in the textile and apparel industry. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, J., Schmidt, F., & Hayes, T. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, K. M. (2013). “If you tickle us…”: How corporations can be moral agents without being persons. Journal of Value Inquiry, 47, 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1991). The metaphysics of morals. (M. Gregory, Trans.) Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kaptein, M. (2011). From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G., & Krause, D. (2014). Special Topic Forum on theory building surrounding sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50, 106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellema, G. (2006). Collective responsibility and qualifying actions. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 30, 176–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. (2004). Fundamentals of supply chain management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmyer, R. (2001). John Marshall and heroic age of the Supreme Court. Baton Rouge: Lousiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1984). Ordinary vices. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. (1992). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TheLawDictionary.org. (n.d.). The Law Dictionary: Featuring Black’s law dictionary free online legal ditionary 2nd ed. (TheLawDictionary.org) Retrieved July 28, 2014, from What is corporation?: http://thelawdictionary.org/corporation/.

  • United Nations General Assembly. (1987, December 11). UN documents: gathering a body of global agreements. Retrieved July 25, 2014, from Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future: http://www.un-documents.net/a42r187.htm.

  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R., & Weitz, B. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung Ha-Brookshire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ha-Brookshire, J. Toward Moral Responsibility Theories of Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Supply Chain. J Bus Ethics 145, 227–237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2847-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2847-2

Keywords

Navigation