Skip to main content
Log in

Organizational Ethics Research: A Systematic Review of Methods and Analytical Techniques

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethics are of interest to business scholars because they influence decisions, behaviors, and outcomes. While scholars have increasingly shown interest in business ethics as a research topic, there are a mounting number of studies that examine ethical issues at the organizational level of analysis. This manuscript reports the results of a systematic review of empirical research on organizational ethics published in a broad sample of business journals over a 33-year period (1980–2012). A total of 184 articles are analyzed to reveal gaps in the literature and, subsequently, lead to suggestions for future research; this is done in an effort to stimulate and perpetuate high quality research that more broadly impacts business scholars and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for suggestions regarding these additional analyses.

References

  • Aadland, E. (2010). Values in professional practice: Towards a critical reflective methodology. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alas, R. (2009). The impact of work-related values on the readiness to change in Estonian organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almer, E. D., Gramling, A., & Kaplan, S. E. (2008). Impact of post-restatement actions taken by a firm on non-professional investors’ credibility perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, Y., & Sharon, I. (1990). Replication research: A ‘must’ for the scientific advancement of psychology. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(4), 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1086–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Radtke, R. R. (2010). The ethical environment of tax professionals: Partner and non-partner perceptions and experiences. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 637–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bright, D., Winn, B., & Kanov, J. (2014). Reconsidering virtue: Differences of perspective in virtue ethics and the positive social sciences. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabretta, G., Durisin, B., & Ogliengo, M. (2011). Uncovering the intellectual structure of research in business ethics: A journey through the history, the classics, and the pillars of Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(4), 499–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón-Cuadrado, R., Álvarez-Arce, J. L., Rodríguez-Tejedo, I., & Salvatierra, S. (2009). “Ethics hotlines” in transnational companies: A comparative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S. (2003). Organizational virtuousness and performance. In K. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 48–65). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 766–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, W. J., Eby, L. T., Bordeaux, C., Lockwood, A., & Lambert, D. (2007). A review of research methods in IO/OB work–family research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatov, R. (1980). What corporate ethics statements say. California Management Review, 22(4), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R. (2005). Ethical character and virtue of organizations: An empirical assessment and strategic implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(3), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J., & Thompson, P. (2000). Do codes make a difference ? The case of bank lending and the environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(2), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (1999). Are you ethical? Please tick yes or no: On researching ethics in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(3), 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. A., Shook, C. L., & Payne, G. T. (2007). The past, present, and future of entrepreneurship research: Data analytic trends and training. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deniz, M. D. L. C. D., & Suarez, M. K. C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and family business in Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donker, H., Poff, D., & Zahir, S. (2008). Corporate values, codes of ethics, and firm performance: A look at the Canadian context. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drover, W., Wood, M., & Payne, G. T. (2014). The effects of perceived control on venture capitalist investment decisions: A configurational perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 833–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: a Study in Sociology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (2008). To prosper, organizational psychology should… overcome methodological barriers to progress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(4), 469–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagenson, E. A. (1990). At the heart of women in management research: Theoretical and methodological approaches and their biases. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4–5), 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felo, A. J. (2001). Ethics programs, board involvement, and potential conflicts of interest in corporate governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M., & Canela, M. (2010). Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(1), 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R., Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2009). Embedded ethics: Discourse and power in the New South Wales police service. Organization Studies, 30(1), 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halter, M. V., Arruda, M. C. C., & Halter, R. B. (2009). Transparency to reduce corruption? Journal of Business Ethics, 84(3), 373–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. M. (2008). Reconciliation in business ethics: Some advice from Aristotle. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Klein, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holder-Webb, L., & Cohen, J. (2012). The cut and paste society: Isomorphism in codes of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(4), 485–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, S. M., Gabel, J. T. A., & Williams, D. W. (2009). Connecting the two faces of CSR: Does employee volunteerism improve compliance? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhtala, M., Feldt, T., Lämsä, A.-M., Mauno, S., & Kinnunen, U. (2011). Does the ethical culture of organisations promote managers’ occupational well-being? Investigating indirect links via ethical strain. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., Wood, V. R., & Chonko, L. B. (1989). Corporate ethical values and organizational commitment in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis, J. P. (2007). Non-replication and inconsistency in the genome-wide association setting. Human Heredity, 64(4), 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, K. G., & Drozdenko, R. G. (2010). Relationships among perceived organizational core values, corporate social responsibility, ethics, and organizational performance outcomes: An empirical study of information technology professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(3), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, H., & Na, H. (2012). Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., Martin, K. D., & Saini, A. (2011). Strategic culture and environmental dimensions as determinants of anomie in publicly-traded and privately-held firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 473–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, S., & Wood, R. V. (2007). Dialectical interactions: Decoupling and integrating ethics and ethics initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(2), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., & McClelland, G. H. (1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M., Colbert, A. E., & Rynes, S. L. (2007). What causes a management article to be cited—Article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (1998). Ethics management: Auditing and developing the ethical content of organizations. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2008). Developing and testing a measure for the ethical culture of organizations: The corporate ethical virtues model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(7), 923–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2009). Ethics programs and ethical culture: A next step in unraveling their multi-faceted relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2010). The ethics of organizations: A longitudinal study of the U.S. working population. Journal of Business Ethics, 92(4), 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ki, E. J., Choi, H. L., & Lee, J. (2012). Does ethics statement of a public relations firm make a difference? Yes it does!! Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 267–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(3), 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N. (1986). Article popularity. Economic Inquiry, 24(1), 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272(2), 147–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. (2011). Cultural and organizational antecedents of guanxi: The Chinese cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(3), 441–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T., McDonald, B., & Yun, H. (2009). A wolf in sheep’s clothing: The use of ethics related terms in 10-K reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. C. (2013). After virtue. Edinburgh: A&C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, L. S., & Thorne, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and long-term compensation: Evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(3), 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majluf, N. S., & Navarrete, C. M. (2011). A two-component compliance and ethics program model: An empirical application to Chilean corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(4), 567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Sommer, A. P., & Roshwalb, A. (1996). An examination of the relationship between ethical behavior, espoused ethical values and financial performance in the U.S. defense industry: 1988-1992. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1249–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1996). The influence of collegiate and corporate codes of conduct on ethics-related behavior in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(4), 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. M. (2000). Cross-cultural methodological issues in ethical research. Business challenging business ethics: New instruments for coping with diversity in international business. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • McKendall, M. A., & Wagner, J. A. (1997). Motive, opportunity, choice, and corporate illegality. Organization Science, 8(6), 624–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenny, A. F., Payne, G. T., Zachary, M. A., & Short, J. C. (2013). Multilevel analysis in family business studies. Sage Handbook of Family Business. London: Sage Publications.

  • McKenny, A. M., Short, J. C., & Payne, G. T. (2013b). Using computer-aided text analysis to elevate constructs: An illustration using psychological capital. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 152–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2008). Researcher interaction biases and business ethics research: Respondent reactions to researcher characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 779–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (1999). Corporate moral agency: Review and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 21(4), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2002). On the implications of the practice-institution distinction: MacIntyre and the application of modern virtue ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 19–32.

  • Moore, G. (2012). Virtue in business: Alliance boots and an empirical exploration of MacIntyre’s conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 33(3), 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Schindehutte, M., Walton, J., & Allen, J. (2002). The ethical context of entrepreneurship: Proposing and testing a developmental framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(4), 331–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, C. Y., & DeMoss, M. (2009). Teaching ethics and social responsibility: An evaluation of undergraduate business education at the discipline level. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 213–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. P., & Massa, F. G. (2013). Reintegrating ethics and institutional theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pae, J., & Choi, T. H. (2011). Corporate governance, commitment to business ethics, and firm valuation: Evidence from the Korean stock market. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(2), 323–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T. (2006). Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context. Organization Science, 17(6), 756–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Broberg, J., Moss, T. W., & Short, J. C. (2011a). Organizational virtue orientation and family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2), 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Bell, R. G., & Zachary, M. A. (2013). Signaling organizational virtue: An examination of virtue rhetoric, country-level corruption and performance of foreign IPOs from emerging and developed economies. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(3), 230–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Moore, C. B., Griffis, S., & Autry, C. (2011b). Multilevel challenges and opportunities in social capital research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(11), 805–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., Ribeiro, N., & Cunha, M. P. (2010). Perceptions of organizational virtuousness and happiness as predictors of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C. J. (2008). An analysis of 10 years of business ethics research in Strategic Management Journal: 1996–2005. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 745–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C., Gilley, K. M., & Crittenden, W. F. (2008). Trade liberalization, corruption, and software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 623–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D., Manning, J., & Denyer, D. (2008). Chapter 11: Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 475–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette and L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, (Vol. 1, pp. 419–489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1248–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schriescheim, C. A., Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. G., & Lankau, M. J. (1993). Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil survey-type instruments. Journal of Management, 19(2), 385–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekerka, L., Comer, D., & Godwin, L. (2014). Positive organizational ethics: Cultivating and sustaining moral performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, R., Rupp, D. E., Skarlicki, D. P., & Jones, K. S. (2013). Employee justice across cultures: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 39(1), 263–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., & Ketchen, D. J. (2008). Research on organizational configurations: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1053–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1992). Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 317–339.

  • Somers, M. (2001). Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: A study of the relationship between codes of conduct, employee behavior and organizational values. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(2), 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Toward the construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 828–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., Bowker, G. C., & Neumann, L. J. (1997). Transparency at different levels of scale: convergence between information artifacts and social worlds. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Library and Information Science, University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. M., Kevin Steensma, H., Harrison, D. A., & Cochran, P. L. (2005). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives’ decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, L. (1990). Some methodological problems associated with researching women entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4–5), 439–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94–110). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un) Ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Brown, M. E. (2008). It’s lovely at the top. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. (1999). Managing Ethics and Legal Compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41(2), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, F. C., & Fan, Y. J. (2011). Exploring the influence of organizational ethical climate on knowledge management. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., Dienhart, J., & Thomas, T. (2008). The ethical commitment to compliance: Building value-based cultures. California Management Review, 50(2), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J., Sorensen, J. B., & Mitchell, T. R. (2007). The interplay between theory and method. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1145–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, J. F., & Dechant, K. (1993). Fax Poll: Altruism in Corporate America. Academy of Management Executive, 7(3), 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1–2), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as controls systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W. G., Unterrainer, C., & Schmid, B. E. (2009). The influence of organizational democracy on employees’ socio-moral climate and prosocial behavioral orientations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(8), 1127–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A., Felin, T., & King, B. G. (2009). The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 35(3), 537–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wines, W., & Napier, N. (1992). Toward an understanding of cross-cultural ethics: A tentative model. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 831–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. A., & Goodstein, J. (2007). Character is not “dead” in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33(6), 928–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yauch, C. A., & Steudel, H. J. (2003). Complementary use of qualitative and quantitative cultural assessment methods. Organizational Research Methods, 6(4), 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Shu, P. G. (2008). The agency problems embedded in firm’s equity investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1/2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Tyge Payne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLeod, M.S., Payne, G.T. & Evert, R.E. Organizational Ethics Research: A Systematic Review of Methods and Analytical Techniques. J Bus Ethics 134, 429–443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2436-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2436-9

Keywords

Navigation