Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Cognitive–Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study of moral decision-making presents to us two approaches for understanding such choices. The cognitive and the neurocognitive approaches postulate that reason and reasoning determines moral judgments. On the other hand, the intuitionist approaches postulate that automated intuitions mostly dominate moral judgments. There is a growing concern that neither of these approaches by itself captures all the key aspects of moral judgments. This paper draws on models from neurocognitive research and social-intuitionist research areas to propose an integrative cognitive–intuitive model of moral decision-making. The model suggests that moral decision-making includes five interdependent, yet functionally distinct steps, issue framing, pre-processing, moral judgment, moral reflection, and moral intent. The model proposes a cognitive–intuitive view of moral judgment and it describes how emotion regulation, perceived moral intensity, and perceived ethical climate constructs impact the formation of moral intent. The paper discusses the theories that link emotions to moral judgment and implications of the model for future research and its implication for managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaah, I. (1992). Social inclusion as a marketing ethics correlate. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, A., & Wong, D. (2000). The Impact of Guanxi on the ethical decision-making process of auditors: An exploratory study on Chinese CPA’s in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J., & Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J., Gollwitzer, P., Lee-Chaiand, A., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Unconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and moral decision making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(5), 1038–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, M., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior: Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C., O’Quin, K., Fultz, J., Vanderpla, M., & Isen, A. (1983). Influence of self-reported distress and empathy on egoistic versus altruistic motivation to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 706–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, J., Hynes, C., Horn, J., Grafton, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2006). Consequences action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 803–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A., & Mee, L. (2000). The effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 255–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, W., & Sutton, J. (2012). Reflections on emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning: Toward an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to moral cognition. In R. Langdon & C. Mackenzie (Eds.), Emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning (pp. 257–278). London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C., Shafer, W., & Strawser, R. (2000). A multidimensional analysis of tax practitioners ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(3), 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., Johnson, N., & Ohmer, D. (1998). Issue-contingent effects on ethical decision making: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa, R. (1987). The rationality of emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa, R. (2012). Emotion. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2012 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/emotion/.

  • DeSteno, D., Petty, R., Wegener, D., & Rucker, D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 33 (pp. 1–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, P., Davidson, R., & Schwartz, B. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., Guthrie, I., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: Their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, R. (2002). Determinants of earnings management ethics among accountants. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(1), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O., & Fraedrich, J. (1997). Business ethics (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding moral decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, D., Pillsworth, E., & Flamson, T. (2004). Angry men and disgusted women: An evolutionary approach to the influence of emotions on risk taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. (2006). Is the emotional dog wagging its rational tail, or chasing it? Philosophical Explorations, 9, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman, G., & Valentine, S. (2003). Professionals’ tax liability and moral evaluations in an equitable relief innocent spouse case. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, A. (2005). Locus of control and the moral reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1/3), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (2000). The impact of moral intensity on decision-making in the business context. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fultz, J., Batson, C., Fortenbach, V., McCarthy, P., & Varney, L. (1986). Social evaluation and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of misused opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granitz, N., & Ward, J. (2001). Actual and perceived sharing of ethical reasoning and moral intent among in-group and out-group. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(4), 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends Cognitive Science, 11, 322–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2009). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences IV, (4th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Greene, J., Nystrom, L., Engell, A., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., Sommerville, R., Nystrom, L., Darley, J., & Cohen, J. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, P. (2003). Emotions rationality, and mind/body, VII. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 52, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., & Farnham, S. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., McGhee, D., & Schwartz, J. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A., Oakes, M., & Hoffman, H. (2003). Targets of discrimination: Effects of race on responses to weapons holders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 399–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III: Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., & Levenson, R. (1993). Emotional suppression: Physiology self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 970–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J., & Thompson, R. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2004). The emotional dog gets mistaken for a possum. Review of General Psychology, 8, 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Kesebir S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske & D. G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Hobeken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Haines, R., Street, M., & Haines, D. (2008). The influence of perceived importance of an ethical issue on moral judgment, moral obligation, and moral intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2009). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Science, 13(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 48, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, H. (2000). Reinforcing ethical decision-making through organizational structure. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Moral decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2003). XI. Emotion, weakness of will, and the normative conception of agency. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 52, 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2011a). Toward effective codes: Testing the relationship with unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, M. (2011b). From inaction to external whistleblowing: The influence of the ethical culture of organizations on employee responses to observed wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A., Wheeler, S., Bargh, J., & Ross, L. (2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P., & Elm, D. (2003). The effect of context on moral intensity of moral issues: Revising Jones’s issue-contingent model. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, J. (2012). Living with one’s choices: Moral reasoning in vitro and in vivo. In R. Langdon & C. Mackenzie (Eds.), Emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning (pp. 257–278). New York: Psychology Press.

  • Kennett, J., & Fine, C. (2009). Will the real moral judgment please stand up? Moral Theory and Moral Practice, 12(1), 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketelaar, T., & Au, W. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on the behavior of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 429–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2003). Ethical standards and ideology among Korean public relations practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Moral Development and Behavior (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 362–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. (2012). Emotions, reflections and moral agency. In R. Langdon & C. Mackenzie (Eds.), Emotions, imagination, and moral reasoning (pp. 237–255). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. (2004). Responsibility, inconsistency, and the paradoxes of morality in human nature: de Waal’s window into business ethics, Ruffin series no. 4. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, D., & Pauli, K. (2002). The role of moral intensity in moral decision-making. Business and Society, 41, 84–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D. M. (1999). Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39(1), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monin, B., Pizarro, D., & Beer, J. (2007). Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paolillo, J., & Vitell, S. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(1), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. (2006). The emotional basis of moral judgment. Philosophical Experience, 9, 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan, R., & Pham, M. (1999). All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 56–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razzaque, M., & Hwee, T. (2002). Ethics and purchasing dilemma: A Singaporean view. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R., & Robin, D. (1990). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluation of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R., & Robin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of corporate moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Prarger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., & Narváez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J., Thoma, S., & Edwards, L. (1997). Designing and validating a measure of moral development: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S. (2006). A neurocognitive model of the moral decision making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 737–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D., Reidenbach, R., & Forrest, P. (1996). The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers. Journal of Business Research, 35, 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roozen, L., Pelsmacker, P., & Bostyn, F. (2001). The ethical dimensions of decision processes of employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(2), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, A. (1980). Explaining emotions (pp. 103–126). Los Angeles: University of California Press.

  • Russo, J., Medvec, V., & Melot, M. (1996). The distortion of information during decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climate: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 447–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W., Morris, R., & Ketchand, A. (2001). Effects of personal values on auditors’ ethical decisions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 254–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. (2003). The moral intensity of privacy: An empirical study of webmasters attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(4), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, A. (1997). Observer judgments about moral agents ethical decisions: The role of scope of justice and moral intensity. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(5), 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M., Mitchell, S., & Turner, J. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgments: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(5), 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. (1993). Ethical perceptions of marketers: The interaction effects of machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(5), 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Karande, K., Rao, C., & Vitell, S. (2001). How important are ethics and social responsibility? A multinational study of marketing professionals. European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Rao, C., & Vitell, S. (1996a). Moral decision making: An investigation of services marketing professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 635–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S., & Kraft, K. (1996b). Moral intensity and ethical decision-making of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. (2002). The Affect Heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction intuition, and justification in responding to moral issues at work: The sense making-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A., & Messick, D. (1999). Sanctioning systems decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Chapter 13: Ethical decision making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 545–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A., Smith-Crowe, K., & Umphress, E. (2003). Building houses on rocks: The role of the ethical infrastructure in organizations. Social Justice Research, 16, 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. (1986). The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, B. (1986). Tough choices: Managers talk ethics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. (1986). Moral decision making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udas, K., Fuerst, W., & Paradice, D. (1996). An investigation of ethical perceptions of public sector MIS professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann, E., Poehlman, T., & Bargh, J. (2007). Inherited ideology: Implicit puritanism in American moral cognition. Paper presented at the meeting of the academy of management, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Vaicys, C., & Barnett, T. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals perceptions of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17, 476–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2003). Moral reasoning in an equitable relief innocent spouse context. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bos, K. (2003). On the subjective quality of social justice: The role of affect as information in the psychology of justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 482–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., Uwerkerk, C., & Peelen, E. (1996). Exploring the contextual and individual factors on ethical decision making of salespeople. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1175–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., & Cullen, J. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S., & Sanders, G. (2001). Considerations in moral decision making and software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1–2), 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D., & Smith-Crowe, K. (2008). Deciding what’s right: The role of external sanctions and embarrassment in shaping moral judgments in the workplace. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T., Gallo, I., Miles, E., Gollwitzer, P., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Effective regulation of affect: An action control perspective on emotion regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 143–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J., & Seger, J. (2002). Influences upon organizational ethical subclimates: A replication study of a single firm at two points in time. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1/2), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, W., Moore, C., McKinney, J., & Longenecker, G. (1999). The effects of gender and career stage on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(4), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M., & Pieters, R. (2006). Feeling is for doing: A pragmatic approach to the study of emotions in economic behavior. In D. De Cremer, M. Zeelenberg, & K. Murnighan (Eds.), Social psychology and economics (pp. 117–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, 214 Hayden Hall, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115-5000, USA

    Adenekan Dedeke

Authors
  1. Adenekan Dedeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adenekan Dedeke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dedeke, A. A Cognitive–Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment. J Bus Ethics 126, 437–457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1965-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1965-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation