Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical perceptions of marketers: The interaction effects of machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the interaction effects of Machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture on two components of a marketer's ethical decision — perceptions of an ethical problem and perceptions of remedial alternatives. The results suggest that certain aspects of ethical perceptions are related to the interaction between Machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berlin, I.: 1980, ‘The Originality of Machiavelli’, in H. Hardy (ed.),Against the Current (Viking Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R.et al.: 1968, Unpublished manuscript, Department of Social Psychology, Columbia University.

  • Christie, R., and Geis, F. L.: 1970,Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J.: 1985, ‘Studying Field Salespeople's Ethical Problems: An Approach for Designing Company Policies’, in G. R. Laczniak and P. E. Murphy (eds.),Marketing Ethics: Guidelines for Managers (D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington, Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky, A. J., Berkowitz, E. N. and Rudelius, W.: 1980 (Summer), ‘Ethical Problems of Field Sales Personnel’,MSU Business Topics 28, pp. 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C. and Gresham, L. G.: 1985 (Summer), ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 49, pp. 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., Gresham, L. G. and Fraedrich, J.: 1989 (Fall), ‘A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Model for Marketing’,Journal of Macromarketing 11, pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, F. L. and Christie, R.: 1970, ‘Overview of Experimental Research’, in R. Christie and F. L. Geis (eds.),Studies in Machiavellianism (Academic Press, New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M. and Donnelly, J. H., Jr.: 1982,Organizations, 4th ed. (Business Publications, Inc., Plano, Texas).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and Sims, H. P., Jr.: 1978, ‘Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment’,Journal of Applied Psychology 63(4), pp. 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H. and Sims, H. P., Jr.: 1979, ‘Organization Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’,Journal of Applied Psychology 64(3), pp. 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and Chonko, L. B.: 1984 (Summer), ‘Marketing and Machiavellianism’,Journal of Marketing 48, pp. 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., Chonko, L. B. and Wilcox, J. B.: 1984 (August), ‘Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers’,Journal of Marketing Research 21, pp. 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. and Vitell, S.: 1986 (Spring), ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of Macromarketing 8, pp. 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., Wood, V. R. and Chonko, L. B.: 1989 (July), ‘Corporate Ethical Values and Organizational Commitment in Marketing’,Journal of Marketing 53, pp. 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1991 (April), ‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’,Academy of Management Review 16, pp. 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1981,The Meaning and Measurement of Moral Development (Clark University Press, Worcester, Massachusetts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N.: [1513] 1965a,The Prince (translated by A. Gilbert), inChief Works and Others (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N.: [1531] 1965b,Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius (translated by A. Gilbert), inChief Works and Others (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M. A. and Marks, L. J.: 1990 (Spring), ‘An Empirical Investigation of a General Theory of Marketing Ethics’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 18, pp. 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. E. and Laczniak, G. R.: 1981, ‘Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications For Managers, Educators and Researchers’, in B. M. Enis and K. J. Roering (eds.),Review of Marketing 1981 (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL), pp. 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. G., Massy, W. F. and Greyser, S. A.: 1980,Marketing Research and Knowledge Development: An Assessment for Marketing Management (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newstorm, J. W. and Ruch, W. A.: 1975 (Winter), ‘The Ethics of Management and the Management of Ethics’,MSU Business Topics 23, pp. 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. P.: 1979 (February), ‘Reliability: A Review of Psychometric Basics and Recent Marketing Practices’,Journal of Marketing Research 16, pp. 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E. and Robin, D. P.: 1990, ‘A Partial Testing of the Contingency Framework for Ethical Decision Making: A Path Analytical Approach’, in L. M. Capellaet al. (eds.),Progress in Marketing Thought (Southern Marketing Association, Mississippi State, MS), pp. 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, D. P. and Reidenbach, R. E.: 1987 (November), ‘Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gaps Between Concept and Application’,Journal of Marketing 51, pp. 44–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. P. and Shaver, P. R.: 1973,Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes (Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, R. D.: 1987 (January), ‘Managerial Morality and Behavior: The Questionable Payments Issue’,Journal of Business Ethics 6, pp. 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudelius, W. and Bucholz, R. A.: 1979 (March–April), ‘Ethical Problems of Purchasing Manager’,Harvard Business Review 57, pp. 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz II, C. J.: 1990, ‘Machiavellianism, Organizational Structure, and Performance among Sales-related Boundary Role Persons’, Dissertation. (Department of Social Psychology, Columbia University).

  • Singhapakdi, A. and Vitell, S. J.: 1990 (Spring), ‘Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives’,Journal of Macromarketing 12, pp. 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. and Vitell, S. J.: 1991 (Winter), ‘Research Note: Selected Background Factors Influencing Marketers' Deontological Norms’,Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19, pp. 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’,Academy of Management Review 11(3), pp. 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. and Hunt, S. D.: 1990, ‘The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Partial Test of the Model’, in Jagdish, N. Sheth (ed.),Research in Marketing, Vol. 10 (JAI Press Grennwich, CT), pp. 237–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K. M. and Ferrell, O. C.: 1977, ‘The Impact of Corporate Policy on Reported Ethical Beliefs and Behavior of Marketing Practitioners’, in B. A. Greenberg and D. N. Bellenger (eds.),Contemporary Marketing Thought (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL), pp. 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1947,The Theory of Social and Economic Organization (Trans. A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons. (New York:) Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Anusorn Singhapakdi is Assistant Professor of Marketing at Old Dominion University. His papers on various topics in marketing ethics and corporate/consumer social responsibility have been published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Macromarketing, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, and others. He has presented papers at various professional conferences, including the American Marketing Association and the Academy of Marketing Science.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singhapakdi, A. Ethical perceptions of marketers: The interaction effects of machiavellianism and organizational ethical culture. J Bus Ethics 12, 407–418 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00882031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00882031

Keywords

Navigation