Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Meaning Making by Managers: Corporate Discourse on Environment and Sustainability in India

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The globally generated concepts of environment and sustainability are fast gaining currency in international business discourse. Sustainability concerns are concurrently becoming significant to business planning around corporate social responsibility and integral to organizational strategies toward enhancing shareholder value. The mindset of corporate managers is a key factor in determining company approaches to sustainability. But what do corporate managers understand by sustainability? Our study explores discursive meaning negotiation surrounding the concepts of environment and sustainability within business discourse. The study is based on qualitative interpretive research drawing from symbolic interactionism (Blumer, Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1969) which postulates that meaning in discourse is an essentially contested domain dependent upon negotiation in the Habermasian tradition of mutually respectful dialogue (Habermas, The theory of communicative action: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press, Boston 1987). Data from semi-structured intensive interviews of a small sample of senior corporate managers was analyzed to examine how corporate elites in India frame their approach to sustainability issues and respond to external pressures for deeper corporate responsibility. The findings point to the existence of a distinctively local narrative with strong potential for the discursive negotiation of personal and collective understanding of ethical and socio-cultural values that may help internalize broader sustainability considerations into corporate decision-making processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, I., & Morris, C. T. (1997). Development history and its implications for development theory: An editorial. World Development, 25(6), 831–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, R. J. (2009). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, N. A., & Hall, R. P. (2011). Technology, globalization and sustainable development: Transforming the industrial state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslund, A., & Dabrowski, M. (Eds.). (2008). Challenges of globalization: Imbalances and growth. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkisson, A. (2011). The sustainability transformation. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, S. B. (2004). Teaching sustainability: A critical perspective. In C. Galea (Ed.), Teaching business sustainability (Vol. 1). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (Ed.). (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. (1994). ‘Sustainable development’: Is it a useful concept? Environmental Values, 3(3), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beekun, R. I., & Westerman, J. W. (2012). Spirituality and national culture as antecedents to ethical decision-making: A comparison between the US and Norway. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreaux, D. J. (2008). Globalization. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, O., & Kalland, A. (Eds.). (1995). Asian perceptions of nature. Studies in Asian tropics. London: Curzon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, D. (2003). How corporations hurt us all: Saving our rights, democracy and institutions and our future. Victoria, BC: Trafford Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J. B., & Ames, R. T. (Eds.). (2001). Nature in Asian traditions and thought: Essays in environmental philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelló, I., & Lozano, J. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2007). Kicking away the ladder: The ‘real” history of free trade. In A. Sheikh (Ed.), Globalization and the myths of free trade: History, theory and empirical evidence (pp. 23–50). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2005). Advancing social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage book of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, G. (2012). Responding to the Global Financial Crisis: The evolution of Asian regionalism and economic globalization. ADBI Working Paper 343. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo.

  • Chitty, N. (2011). Public diplomacy: Courting publics for short-term advantage or partnering publics for lasting peace and sustainable prosperity. In A. Fisher & S. Lucas (Eds.), Trials of engagement: The future of US public diplomacy. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., et al. (Eds.). (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, J., Richardson, K., et al. (1990). Nuclear reactions: Form and response in public issue television. London: John Libbey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, P. (2008). Gandhian values and post development: Models for social transformation. In R. Ghosh, K. R. Gupta, & P. Maiti (Eds.), Development studies (Vol. 2, pp. 150–189). New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, D., & Capaldi, N. (Eds.). (2008). The Ashgate research companion to CSR. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2010). Sustainability in business today: A cross-industry view. New York: Deloitte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., & Chitty, N. (2012). A comparative study of Chinese and American media treatment of Vice President Xi Jinping’s official tour of the US. Communications, Politics and Culture, 45(2), 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco-Business. (2012). Corporate attitudes towards CSR. Research. Eco-Business.Com., Singapore.

  • Ferguson, T., & Thomas-Hope, E. (2006). Environmental education and constructions of sustainable development in Jamaica. In L. Hill, A. Terry, & W. A. Woodland (Eds.), Sustainable development: National aspirations, local implementation J (pp. 91–115). Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, A. C. (2010). Business ethics: An Indian perspective. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fien, J., Yencken, D., et al. (Eds.). (2000). Environment, education and society in the Asia-Pacific: Local traditions and global discourses. Routledge advances in Asia Pacific studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forey, G., & Lockwood, J. (Eds.). (2010). Globalization, communication and the workplace: Talking across the world. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadsby, H., & Bullivant, A. (Eds.). (2010). Global learning and sustainable development. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, C. (2004). Teaching business sustainability: From theory to practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. Research in Political Sociology, 3, 77–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam, F. D. (2007). A new dominant frame, Issue 22. Washington, DC: Frameworks Institute.

  • Gilliam, F. D., & Bales, S. N. (2001). Strategic frame analysis: Referencing America’s youth. Retrieved 25 Feb, 2013, from www.escholarship.org.

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, S., & Kaur, R. (2009). Cultural mythology and global leadership in India. In E. H. Kessler & D. J. Wong-MingJi (Eds.), Cultural mythology and global leadership (pp. 306–325). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herremans, I. M., & Reid, R. E. (2002). Developing awareness of the sustainability concept. The Journal of Environment Education, 34(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, C., Schmidheiny, S., et al. (2002). Walking the talk: The Business case for sustainable development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckle, J. (1993). Environmental education and sustainability: A view from critical theory. In J. Fien (Ed.), Environmental education: A pathway to sustainability (pp. 43–68). Geelong: Deakin University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallow, K. (2008). Sustainability and its place in CSR research. In D. Crowther & N. Capaldi (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to corporate social responsibility. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., Selby, D., et al. (Eds.). (2010). Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R., Parris, T., et al. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment Magazine, 47(3), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledwith, M. (2001). Community development—A critical approach. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lele, S. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal, S. K. (2010). Ethics in business and corporate governance. New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei, L., & Dinu, T. (2010). Regulation and best practices in public and non profit marketing. In 9th International Congress of the International Association of Public and Non profit Marketing. Bucharest: Editura Economica.

  • McAfee, K. E. (1999). Biodiversity and the contradictions of green developmentalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. R., Just, M., et al. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, T. J., & Harte, G. (1997). Green business: Technicist kitsch? Journal of Management Studies, 34(1), 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, M., & Grainger, A. (2004). Exploring sustainable development: Geographical perspectives. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, L. I., & Rudolph, S. H. (2006). Post modern Gandhi and other essays: Gandhi in the world and at home. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, S. (2010). Political mobilisation, the poor and democratisation in neo-liberal India. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 40(3), 487–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, J. (2007). The Indian economy: Policies, practices and heresies. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1999). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered 25 years later. Vancouver, BC: Hartley and Marks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and TV news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, V., Burman, T., et al. (2010). Incorporating Ethics into Strategy: Developing sustainable business models. Retrieved 19 Feb, 2013, from www.cima.org.

  • Smith, N. C., Bhattacharya, C., et al. (2010). Global challenges in responsible business. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Springett, D. (2003). Business conceptions of sustainable development: A perspective from critical theory. Business Strategy and the Environment, 12(2), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tench, R., Sun, W., et al. (Eds.). (2012). Corporate social irresponsibility. Critical studies on corporate responsibility, governance and sustainability. Emerald Group: Bingley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todaro, M. P. (1981). Economic development in the third world. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P. (2008). Integrative economic ethics: Foundations of a civilized market economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vienneau, R. (2012, 26 July). Thoughts on economics: Amartya Sen and the second phase of the classical revival. Retrieved Feb 15, 2013, from http://robertvienneau.blogspot.com.au/2012/07/amartya-sen-and-second-phase-of.html.

  • Walsh, V. C., & Gram, H. (1980). Classical and neoclassical theories of general equilibrium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnke, G. (1987). Gadamer: Hermeneutics, tradition, and reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. United Nations.

  • Werhane, P. H., & Singer, A. E. (Eds.). (1999). Business ethics in theory and practice: Contributions from Asia and New Zealand. Amsterdam: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media, Music, Communication and Cultural Studies, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Prithi Nambiar & Naren Chitty

Authors
  1. Prithi Nambiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naren Chitty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prithi Nambiar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nambiar, P., Chitty, N. Meaning Making by Managers: Corporate Discourse on Environment and Sustainability in India. J Bus Ethics 123, 493–511 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1848-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1848-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation