Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility as Subsidiary Co-Responsibility: A Macroeconomic Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent discussion on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) mainly focuses on two aspects of CSR: from a technical perspective, CSR aims to improve ethical standards in the organizational decision-making process, and should guarantee that management practices are in accordance with commonly accepted standards of behavior. From a political perspective, CSR describes corporate engagement with ecological and social issues that extend beyond the firm’s economic activities. The latter perspective in particular leaves unclear whether such corporate contributions to solve environmental and societal problems should be seen as voluntary additional services or whether corporations bear specific duties in this field. Based on the tenet of subsidiarity derived from Catholic thought, this article emphasizes that the common interpretation of CSR should be extended by a third perspective that addresses corporations as intermediate actors bearing specific subsidiary co-responsibilities in society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arretz, M.: 2009, ‘Pioniere und Phasenmodelle – Wege zum erfolgreichen Management von CSR’, in M. S. Aßländer and K. Senge (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility im Einzelhandel (Metropolis, Marburg), pp. 283-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aßländer, M. S. and A. Brink: 2008, ‘Begründung korporativer Verantwortung: Normenkonkretion als Prozess’, in A. G. Scherer and M. Patzer (eds.), Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Unternehmensethik (Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden), pp. 103-124.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Aßländer, M. S. and A. Löhr: 2010, ‘Zum Klärungsbedarf der Modevokabel Corporate Social Responsibility’, in M. S. Aßländer and A. Löhr (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise (Rainer Hampp, München), pp. 11-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aßländer, M. S. and M. Schenkel: 2009, ‘Vom Guten, vom Schönen und vom Baren: Wie praktikabel ist Ethik als Fondskriterium?’, in G. Ulshöfer and G. Bonnet (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility auf dem Finanzmarkt (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden), pp. 45-63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B.: 2007, Corporate Social Responsibility – The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, N. P.: 1989, ‘Political and Economic Thought of German Neo-Liberals’, in A. Peacock and H. Willgerodt (eds.), German Neo-Liberals and the Social Market Economy (Macmillan, London), pp. 105-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U.: 1998, ‘Wie wird Demokratie im Zeitalter der Globalisierung möglich?’, in U. Beck (ed.), Politik der Globalisierung (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main), pp. 7-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict XVI: 2009, Encyclical-Letter Caritas in Veritate, on Integral Human Development in Charity and Truth, 29th of June 2009 (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Rome). Also available at: www.vatican.va.

  • Blowfield, M. and A. Murray: 2008, Corporate Responsibility – A Critical Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E.: 1999, Business Ethics – A Kantian Perspective (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E. and P. H. Werhane: 2005, Management Ethics (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz, A. K. and A. B. Carroll: 2009, Business and Society (South-Western, Mason, OH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1979, ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 4(4), 497-505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 1998, ‘Social Responsibility’, in P. H. Werhane and R. E. Freeman (eds.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA), pp. 593-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B.: 2004, ‘Managing Ethically with Global Stakeholders: A Present and Future Challenge’, The Academy of Management Executive 18(2), 114-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. and D. Matten: 2007, Business Ethics (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A., D. Matten and L. Spence (eds.): 2008, Corporate Social Responsibility – Readings and Cases in a Global Context (Routledge, New York, NY).

  • Crane, A., A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. S. Siegel (eds.): 2009a, The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. S. Siegel: 2009b, ‘The Corporate Social Responsibility Agenda’ in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. S. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W. and D. Hess: 2000, ‘The legitimacy of direct corporate humanitarian investment’, Business Ethics Quarterly 10(1), 95-109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T. and K. Hockerts: 2002, ‘Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability’, Business Strategy and Environment 11(2), 130-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, D. and R. J. Baumgartner: 2006, The Relationship Between Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility, Paper Presented on the Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, Dublin, September 4th–5th.

  • Elkington, J.: 1999, Cannibals with Forks – The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Capstone, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J.: 2004, ‘Enter the Triple Bottom Line’, in A. Henriques and J. Richardson (eds.), The Triple Bottom Line, Does it all Add up? (Earthscan, London), pp. 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enquete-Kommission: 2002, Zukunft des Bürgerschaftlichen Engagements. Deutscher Bundestag – Bericht: Bürgerschaftliches Engagement: auf dem Weg in eine zukunftsfähige Bürgergesellschaft (Verlag Leske und Budrich, Opladen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eucken, W.: 1949, ‘Die Wettbewerbsordnung und ihre Verwirklichung’ in W. Eucken and F. Böhm (eds.), Ordo – Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (Arnulf Liebing, Würzburg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eucken, W.: 1990, Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik (J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: 2001, Green Paper Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility COM(2001) 366 (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, P. and H. Hadasch: 2010, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in Deutschland – Stand einer gesellschaftspolitischen Diskussion’, in M. S. Aßländer and A. Löhr (eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise (Rainer Hampp, München), pp. 127-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E. and D. Melé: 2004, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory’, Journal of Business Ethics 53(1-2), 51-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: 1998, The Third Way. The Renewal of Social Democracy (Policy Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Compact Office: 2010, ‘The Ten Principles’, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/aboutthegc/thetenprinciples/index.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2010.

  • Habisch, A., R. Schmidpeter and M. Neureiter (eds.): 2008, Handbuch Corporate Citizenship – Corporate Social Responsibility für Manager (Springer Verlag, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D., N. Rogovsky and T. W. Dunfee: 2002, ‘The Next Wave of Corporate Involvment: Corporate Social Initiatives’, California Management Review 44(2), 110-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 26000: 2009, Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 26000 – Guidance on Social Responsibility ICS 03.100.01 (ISO Copyright Office, Geneva).

  • John Paul II: 1991, Centesimus Annus, Encyclical on the hundredth Anniversary of Rerum Novarum, 1st of May 1991 (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Rome). Also available at: www.vatican.va.

  • Kelly, J. E.: 2004, ‘Solidarity and Subsidiarity: ‘Organizing Principles’ for Corporate Moral Leadership in the New Global Economy’, Journal of Business Ethics 52(3), 283-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and N. Lee: 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility – Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Best Practices from Hewlett-Packard, Ben & Jerry’s, and other Leading Companies (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. M.: 2006, ‘One Business’s Commitment to Society: An Interview with the President of the Novartis Foundation for Sustainable Development’, The McKinsey Quarterly No. 3, 99–107.

  • Leisinger, K. M.: 2007, ‘Corporate Philanthropy: The Top of the Pyramid’, Business and Society Review 112(3), 315-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. M.: 2009, ‘On Corporate Responsibility on Human Rights’, in H. Spitzeck, M. Pirson, W. Amann, S. Khan and E. v. Kimakowitz (eds.), Humanism in Business (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 175-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and A. Crane: 2005, ‘Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization’, Academy of Management Review 30(1), 166-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D. and J. Moon: 2008, ‘“Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Academy of Management Review, Jg. 33(2), 404-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A. and D. S. Siegel: 2001, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, D.: 2005, ‘Exploring the Principle of Subsidiarity in Organizational Forms’, Journal of Business Ethics 60(3), 293-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I.: 2006, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability – Separate Pasts, Common Futures’, Organization & Environment 21(3), 245-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Armack, A.: 1981, ‘Soziale Irenik’, in A. Müller-Armack, Religion und Wirtschaft (Haupt, Bern), pp. 559-578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nell-Breuning, O. v.: 1964, Christliche Soziallehre (Pesch-Haus, Mannheim).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nell-Breuning, O. v.: 1968, Baugesetze der Gesellschaft (Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau).

    Google Scholar 

  • Novartis: 2010, ‘Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases’, http://www.novartis.com/research/nitd/index.shtml. Accessed 22 Sept 2010.

  • OECD: 2000, The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (00 2000 54 1 P) – No. 80761 2000 (OECD Publications, Paris).

  • Palazzo, G. and A. G. Scherer: 2006, ‘Corporate Legitimacy as Deliberation. A Communicative Framework’, Journal of Business Ethics 66(1), 71-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PCJP (Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace): 2004, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Rome). Also available at: www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html.

  • Pius XI: 1931, Quadragesimo Anno, Encyclical on Reconstruction of the Social Order, 15th of May 1931 (Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Rome). Also available at: www.vatican.va.

  • Röpke, W.: 1979a, Cicitas humana (Haupt, Bern).

    Google Scholar 

  • Röpke, W.: 1979b, Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage (Haupt: Bern).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2007, ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1096-1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo (eds.): 2008a, Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (Eward Elgar, Cheltenham).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2008b, ‘The Future of Global Corporate Citizenship: Toward a New Theory of the Firm as a Political Actor’, in A. G. Scherer and G. Palazzo (eds.), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (Eward Elgar, Cheltenham), pp. 577-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G. and G. Palazzo: 2009, ‘Globalization and CSR’, in A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon and D. S. Siegel (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 413-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werther, W. B. Jr. and D. Chandler: 2006, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Graduate School, Zittau, Germany

    Michael S. Aßländer

Authors
  1. Michael S. Aßländer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Aßländer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aßländer, M.S. Corporate Social Responsibility as Subsidiary Co-Responsibility: A Macroeconomic Perspective. J Bus Ethics 99, 115–128 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0744-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0744-x

Key words

Search

Navigation